Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#991 closed defect (fixed)
[with patch] problem in interaction with Singular subprocesses
Reported by: | cwitty | Owned by: | malb |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-2.8.13 |
Component: | commutative algebra | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | Work issues: | ||
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
The following happens in 2.8.9.rc1, on 32-bit and 64-bit x86 Linux. Note that the problem does not occur if the "T = ..." line is omitted.
cwitty@comet:~/sage-2.8.9.rc1$ ./sage sage: K.<w> = GF(27) sage: P.<x, y> = PolynomialRing(K, 2, order='lex') sage: I = Ideal([ x^8 + y + 2, y^6 + x*y^5 + x^2 ]) sage: T = I.triangular_decomposition('singular:triangLfak') sage: I.variety() --------------------------------------------------------------------------- <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'> Traceback (most recent call last) /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/<ipython console> in <module>() /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py in variety(self) 1113 1114 P = self.ring() -> 1115 T = self.triangular_decomposition('singular:triangLfak') 1116 1117 V = [] /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py in triangular_decomposition(self, algorithm) 426 P = self.ring() 427 --> 428 is_groebner = self.basis_is_groebner() 429 430 # make sure to work w.r.t. 'lex' /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py in basis_is_groebner(self) 913 LTF = singular( [f.lt() for f in self.gens()] , "module" ) 914 --> 915 M = (F * LTF.syz()).reduce(self._singular_()) 916 917 for i in range(M.nrows()): /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py in _singular_(self, singular) 214 if singular is None: singular = singular_default 215 try: --> 216 self.ring()._singular_(singular).set_ring() 217 I = self.__singular 218 if not (I.parent() is singular): /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx in multi_polynomial_libsingular.MPolynomialRing_libsingular._singular_() /home/cwitty/sage-2.8.9.rc1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/interfaces/singular.py in eval(self, x, allow_semicolon, strip) 372 373 if s.find("error") != -1 or s.find("Segment fault") != -1: --> 374 raise RuntimeError, 'Singular error:\n%s'%s 375 finally: 376 gc.enable() <type 'exceptions.RuntimeError'>: Singular error: ? type 444 too complex...set minpoly before ? error occurred in STDIN line 166: `minpoly=(w^3+2*w+1);` sage:
Attachments (2)
Change History (5)
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Component changed from algebraic geometry to commutative algebra
- Milestone changed from sage-2.9 to sage-2.8.13
- Owner changed from was to malb
- Status changed from new to assigned
- Summary changed from problem in interaction with Singular subprocesses to [with patch] problem in interaction with Singular subprocesses
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
Looks good to me, probably. It's just a format issue anyways.
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from assigned to closed
Merged in 2.8.13.rc1.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
The attached patch fixes this issue for me.