METATICKET Doc test failures on 32bit Solaris 10 and 32bit OpenSolaris on x86 CPUs.
Although the 32bit SPARC version of Sage passes all doc tests, there are still issues on 32bit versions of Solaris/OpenSolaris on x86 hardware. This ticket summaries lists only failures on 32bit builds, versions on x86 processors.
64bit versions have far more failures, and will need another ticket to address them.
Test  Solaris 10  OpenSolaris  Notes

doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rs  Passed  #9736  gfan

doc/rf/tutorial/tour_advanced.rs  Passed  #9736  gfan

sage/lfunctions/sympow.py  #9703  #9703  SYMPOW is also busted on Cygwin & ArchLinux (see #9166)

sage/modular/hecke/submodule.py  #9703  #9703  SYMPOW

sage/modular/abvar/abvar.p  #9703  #9703  SYMPOW

sage/rings/polynomial/groebner_fan.py  Passed  #9736  Gfan

sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py  #9703  #9703  SYMPOW

sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py  Passed  #9736  Gfan

sage/symbolic/expression.pyx  #9689+#9693  #9689+#9693  numerical noise and missing zero

sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx  #9735  #9735  numerical noise. Positive review

At this early stage of the 32bit ports to Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris on x86 processors, it would appear the problems fall into 3 areas
 Numerical noise.
 SYMPOW on both Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris.
 Gfan  only on OpenSolaris.
Change History (12)
Description: 
modified (diff)

Milestone: 
→ sage4.5.3

Description: 
modified (diff)

Description: 
modified (diff)

Milestone: 
sage5.11 →
sage5.12

Milestone: 
sage6.1 →
sage6.2

Milestone: 
sage6.2 →
sage6.3

Milestone: 
sage6.3 →
sage6.4

Description: 
modified (diff)

Milestone: 
sage6.4 →
sageduplicate/invalid/wontfix

Reviewers: 
→ Jeroen Demeyer

Status: 
new →
needs_review

Status: 
needs_review →
positive_review

Resolution: 
→ fixed

Status: 
positive_review →
closed

I discovered the GFAN issues were a mistake on my part, so #9736 was closed as invalid, and those doctest failures can be ignored.
Dave