Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #9706, comment 52
- Timestamp:
- 12/04/13 08:05:25 (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #9706, comment 52
v1 v2 10 10 @SymbolicPolynomial: I don't think this is a good idea because ortho polys are quite special even among the polynomials. But If you really would like to have a SymbolicPolynomial class I would propose to introduce the SymbolicPolynomial class, and derive the OrthogonalPolynomials from that class. 11 11 I make the following suggestion: I will finish the OrthogonalPolynomials with the current design. And then open an new ticket where we discuss the design of a general polynomial parent class. Fortunately, such design changes are very easy to implement in Python, and I don't see any big problem in introducing an intermediate class. 12 But if you want to introduce such a class there are s ammajor decisions to make:12 But if you want to introduce such a class there are some major decisions to make: 13 13 -Where do we put this class? (such a general class should not belong to orthogonoal_polys.py ) 14 14 -What should all SymbolicPolynomials have in common?