Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #9706, comment 52


Ignore:
Timestamp:
12/04/13 08:05:25 (7 years ago)
Author:
maldun
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #9706, comment 52

    v1 v2  
    1010@SymbolicPolynomial: I don't think this is a good idea because ortho polys are quite special even among the polynomials. But If you really would like to have a SymbolicPolynomial class I would propose to introduce the SymbolicPolynomial class, and derive the OrthogonalPolynomials from that class.
    1111I make the following suggestion: I will finish the OrthogonalPolynomials with the current design. And then open an new ticket where we discuss the design of a general polynomial parent class. Fortunately, such design changes are very easy to implement in Python, and I don't see any big problem in introducing an intermediate class.
    12 But if you want to introduce such a class there are sam major decisions to make:
     12But if you want to introduce such a class there are some major decisions to make:
    1313-Where do we put this class? (such a general class should not belong to orthogonoal_polys.py )
    1414-What should all SymbolicPolynomials have in common?