Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#9394 closed defect (fixed)
latex representation of negative coefficients broken
Reported by: | burcin | Owned by: | burcin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-4.6 |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | pynac |
Cc: | Merged in: | sage-4.6.alpha3 | |
Authors: | Burcin Erocal | Reviewers: | Karl-Dieter Crisman |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Reported by Mike Witt on sage-support:
sage: latex(t) \left(2 I\right) \, \pi n x + \left(-2 I\right) \, \pi n
+ (-2 I )
looks really ugly.
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
Changed 10 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
With the new pynac package at #9901, we have:
sage: var('n') n sage: t = 2*I*n*pi*x - 2*I*n*pi sage: latex(t) 2 i \, \pi n x - 2 i \, \pi n
attachment:trac_9394-leading_minus.patch contains the doctest changes. The fixes in the printing of rational functions (for #9834) are also included in this patch.
The pynac package includes patches for #9834, #9878, #9879, #9881, #9900 as well as this ticket. See the ticket description of #9901 for the list (and order) of patches associated to the new version.
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Karl-Dieter Crisman
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-4.6.alpha3
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
See recent comments in #8938, where similar phenomena have been noted.