#9165 closed defect (worksforme)
cygwin: lcalc does not work for elliptic curves on cygwin — at Version 10
Reported by: | was | Owned by: | tbd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | porting: Cygwin | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jean-Pierre Flori | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
lcalc works fine for the zeta function on cygwin, evidently:
sage: time lcalc.zeros(4) CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 0.00 s Wall time: 0.19 s [14.1347251, 21.0220396, 25.0108576, 30.4248761]
However, it doesn't work for computing with elliptic curves:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py" *** not enough memory *** not enough memory *** not enough memory ********************************************************************** File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py", line 120: sage: lcalc.zeros(3, EllipticCurve('37a')) # long Expected: [0.000000000, 5.00317001, 6.87039122] Got: [] ********************************************************************** File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py", line 229: sage: E.lseries().values_along_line(0.5, 3, 5) Expected: [(0, 0.209951303), (0.500000000, -...e-16), (1.00000000, 0.133768433), (1.50000000, 0.360092864), (2.00000000, 0.552975867)] Got: lcalc: [] ********************************************************************** File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/devel/sage/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py", line 374: sage: lcalc.analytic_rank(E) Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_8[3]>", line 1, in <module> lcalc.analytic_rank(E)###line 374: sage: lcalc.analytic_rank(E) File "/home/wstein/sage-4.4.3/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/lfunctions/lcalc.py", line 381, in analytic_rank return Z(s[i+6:]) File "integer.pyx", line 614, in sage.rings.integer.Integer.__init__ (sage/rings/integer.c:6388) TypeError: unable to convert x (=) to an integer ********************************************************************** 3 items had failures: 1 of 5 in __main__.example_2 1 of 6 in __main__.example_5 1 of 4 in __main__.example_8 ***Test Failed*** 3 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/wstein/.sage//tmp/.doctest_lcalc.py [17.7 s]
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by
Note gcc gives many compiler warnings and SunStudio refuses to compile the source code. These matters are probably not entirely unrelated.
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
The lfunctions/ directory appears to pass doctests on a recent build of mine on XP.
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by
plot/line.py also passes tests (though many others do not in plot/, perhaps due to "I" currently not working).
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by
But there is a segfault on the very first example above. Strange that the tests pass.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.6 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Priority changed from major to minor
- Reviewers set to Karl-Dieter Crisman
- Status changed from new to needs_review
These both pass and work "by hand" on XP now. I do get warnings about the new stack size, which keeps going down from 1 MB to .981, .957, .955 with these commands, but they do work (as does the one in line.py) so I would suggest a different ticket for handling the stack on Cygwin.
JP, can you confirm these pass on Win 7? Then we should be set.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
For info, this file passes its tests on my Windows 7 install (without #13351).
So let's close this one.
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
- Reviewers changed from Karl-Dieter Crisman to Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jean-Pierre Flori
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
- Resolution set to worksforme
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
Another test failure resulting from lcalc not working: