Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #9107, comment 15


Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/19/13 20:57:48 (7 years ago)
Author:
SimonKing
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #9107, comment 15

    initial v1  
    22> The same issue arose in #13851 (see [http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13851#comment:10 comment 10]). I'm not sure why those dots are there, and I personally think they should be removed, but someone intentionally put them there.
    33
    4 I think the dot is simply wrong - or is it ignored by Sphynx?
     4I think the dot is simply wrong - or is it ignored by Sphinx?
    55
    66Actually here it is even worse. The text is documentation of a functorial construction, but refers to a parent method - that can't possibly work without an explicit reference to the method which must include the class which the method belongs to.