Opened 11 years ago

Closed 6 years ago

#8757 closed enhancement (fixed)

Use SQLAlchemy for storage in SageNB

Reported by: timdumol Owned by: jason, was
Priority: major Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: notebook Keywords:
Cc: Merged in:
Authors: Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: Commit:
Dependencies: Stopgaps:

Status badges

Description

Using a database engine will be much faster, hopefully lessening the speed issues we have.

Attachments (1)

trac_8757-sqlalchemy-storage-incomplete.patch (59.7 KB) - added by timdumol 11 years ago.
Preliminary work. Schema in sagenb.notebook.models.models.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (11)

Changed 11 years ago by timdumol

Preliminary work. Schema in sagenb.notebook.models.models.

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by jdemeyer

  • Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by vbraun_spam

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by vbraun_spam

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by vbraun_spam

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4

comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by kcrisman

See also #15593.

comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by kcrisman

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.4 to sage-wishlist
  • Type changed from defect to enhancement

This is a noble goal, but currently very unlikely.

comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by kcrisman

See also #4268.

comment:8 Changed 6 years ago by kcrisman

  • Milestone changed from sage-wishlist to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
  • Reviewers set to Karl-Dieter Crisman
  • Status changed from new to needs_review

In fact, this is (essentially) #3456 which I closed before.

comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by kcrisman

  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

comment:10 Changed 6 years ago by vbraun

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.