#7478 closed enhancement (fixed)
TestSuite improvements
| Reported by: | hivert | Owned by: | hivert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-4.3 |
| Component: | doctest coverage | Keywords: | TestSuite |
| Cc: | sage-combinat | Merged in: | sage-4.3.alpha0 |
| Authors: | Florent Hivert, Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: | Nicolas M. Thiéry, Florent Hivert |
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
- Changes "... done" to ". . . pass" in the output of TestSuite?().run(verbose = True) to avoid unintentional matches
- Fix the doctests accordingly.
- Adds skip option; use it in sage/combinat/sf/jack.py and orthotriang.py
- In case of failure, execute the following tests after printing out a traceback, and write a summary at the end
- Only use verbose=True in the doctests when useful (category examples)
Rationale for the ...: when testing something in verbose mode the typical output of sage is:
sage: P = Sets().example("inherits")
sage: TestSuite(P).run(verbose=True)
running ._test_an_element() ... done
running ._test_element_pickling() ... done
running ._test_not_implemented_methods() ... done
running ._test_pickling() ... done
running ._test_some_elements() ... done
And there is some risks that the "..." match something they should'nt I change them to ". . ."
See discussion on sage-devel
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
- Owner changed from tbd to hivert
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
- Cc sage-combinat added; nthiery removed
- Description modified (diff)
- Reviewers set to Nicolas M. Thiéry, Florent Hivert
- Status changed from new to needs_review
- Summary changed from Remove "..." in the output of TestSuite. to TestSuite improvements
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
- Component changed from misc to doctest
- Type changed from defect to enhancement
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 9 years ago by
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to mhansen:
There is a spurious "only" to "o.." change in sets_cat.py.
Good spot :-)
I had already found a couple, and thought I had done a systematic search.
Fixed in the newly uploaded patch.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
Updated patch fix a doctest I had missed.
comment:7 follow-up: ↓ 8 Changed 9 years ago by
There are still some minor problems (missing ``...`` in the documentation of testsuite. Aside those everything is ok for me. Nicolas can you review
trac_7478_testsuite_dots-fh-review.patch
on the queue. Then either me or you fold, reupload and set positive review.
...trying to ping you on irc for synchro.
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Replying to hivert:
There are still some minor problems (missing
``...``in the documentation of testsuite. Aside those everything is ok for me. Nicolas can you reviewtrac_7478_testsuite_dots-fh-review.patchon the queue. Then either me or you fold, reupload and set positive review....trying to ping you on irc for synchro.
Review patch is good. Folded and uploaded. positive review.
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to sage-4.3.alpha0
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
- Report Upstream set to N/A
I just "discovered" sage.misc.sage_unittest. In case it's of wider use: At #7390 there's a unittest HTML report generator that may make it into SageNB.
There is a spurious "only" to "o.." change in sets_cat.py.