Opened 12 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#7357 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Add non-offset logarithmic integral, Li
Reported by: | myurko | Owned by: | burcin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | calculus | Keywords: | beginner |
Cc: | myurko, benjaminfjones | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Karl-Dieter Crisman | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Add the logarithmic integral, Li, with integration starting at 0 rather than 2.
Attachments (2)
Change History (13)
Changed 12 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Changed 12 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by
- Report Upstream set to N/A
- Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
This patch adds these tests. It still depends on the (newest) patch at #3401, and in fact gets rid of one final thing which was only needed by the previous implementation of Li.
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Karl-Dieter Crisman
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by
- Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
This needs more work. See my comments about the prec parameter at comment:10:ticket:3401.
Two different functions whose names differ only in capitalization (li
and Li
) is also very confusing. We need to come up with a better name for this.
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by
- Keywords beginner added
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by
- Cc benjaminfjones added
This seems to be addressed in the context of a much bigger overhaul by #11143. But there the name is... more complicated.
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by
Yes, this would duplicate work done in #11143. The function added there is a fully symbolic function with numerical evaluation handled by mpmath. I think that is superior to the one defined here which is just a wrapper for the mpmath call.
The function added in #11143 is really a class called Function_exp_integral_li
and it has an alias
exp_integral_li
to match the other exponential integrals. #11143 also moves all the exponential integrals to a new module under sage/functions so this would conflict with that design decision too.
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-4.7.2 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
So this can be closed as duplicate, correct? Except I really would love it to be called Li
instead of something horribly long... either way, feel free to review this as positive; I'm changing the milestone.
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
This is definitely and definitively duplicated by the much more comprehensive #11143.
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
This is nice, but like #3401, should have some doctests indicating it works for complex input (I assume it does). The patch also depends on #3401.