Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #715, comment 241


Ignore:
Timestamp:
09/05/12 23:02:46 (7 years ago)
Author:
nbruin
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #715, comment 241

    v1 v2  
    3131                e = proc.poll()
    3232}}}
    33 The worrying bit is that the way I read the code, `cmd` is not affected by
    34 `--verbose`. So then the SEGV would depend on whether `stdout` and `stderr` are
    35 redirected. However, you could add a `print out`. Perhaps do a `outf.sync()` too
    36 (would that even help?), although I guess by then the child process has died already and would have
    37 flushed its buffers to the file.
     33The verbose parameter does get written into the file that `cmd` executes, so it
     34has effect there as well. You could also just extract that temporary file and
     35hack on that.
    3836
    3937Of course, this all only might help you to figure out where the SEGV occurs,