| 33 | | The worrying bit is that the way I read the code, `cmd` is not affected by |
| 34 | | `--verbose`. So then the SEGV would depend on whether `stdout` and `stderr` are |
| 35 | | redirected. However, you could add a `print out`. Perhaps do a `outf.sync()` too |
| 36 | | (would that even help?), although I guess by then the child process has died already and would have |
| 37 | | flushed its buffers to the file. |
| | 33 | The verbose parameter does get written into the file that `cmd` executes, so it |
| | 34 | has effect there as well. You could also just extract that temporary file and |
| | 35 | hack on that. |
