Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #6637, comment 52


Ignore:
Timestamp:
05/12/14 20:51:26 (6 years ago)
Author:
slabbe
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #6637, comment 52

    v1 v2  
    1414
    1515So, we go with commit ​dd72bfc instead of ​3191690 ?
    16 
    17 The more I think about it, the less I like it. I think ​dd72bfc can be confusing for someone looking at the file for the first time. Until that person looks at the file `sage/sets/all.py` he will not understand how the `__init__` handles the `structure` argument. I suggest we go with commit ​3191690. Do you agree?
    18 
    19 If so, I do not know what should we do then (git question). Should we update the commit field? Should we reset the HEAD of the branch? Should we create a new branch pointing to the commit?