Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#6602 closed enhancement (fixed)
[with spkg, positive review] GLPK for Sage
Reported by: | ncohen | Owned by: | tbd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-4.1.1 |
Component: | packages: optional | Keywords: | |
Cc: | wstein, mvngu | Merged in: | Sage 4.1.1.rc1 |
Authors: | Nathann Cohen | Reviewers: | David Joyner |
Report Upstream: | Work issues: | ||
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
GLPK ( http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/ ) is a Linear Program solver from GNU. It can also solve Mixed Integer Programs, and is needed for : http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6502
More informations on : http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/9da47e06bcdfc49f
SPKG available there : http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Nathann.Cohen/glpk-4.38.spkg
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
- Summary changed from [with SPKG, need review] GLPK for SAGE to [with SPKG, positive review] GLPK for SAGE
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
I think that most of the tests of this spkg will be done in http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6502
I hope it will be possible to quickly include all of this into SAGE !! ( Oh, and this spkg is meant to be standard, not just optional !! )
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by
- Summary changed from [with SPKG, positive review] GLPK for SAGE to [with spkg, positive review] GLPK for SAGE
It's rather difficult to include this SPKG when there are (as yet) no functions in the Sage library to test its functionalities. Once #6502 gets positive review, this SPKG could then be merged in the Sage standard packages repository.
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
- Summary changed from [with spkg, positive review] GLPK for SAGE to [with spkg, positive review] GLPK for Sage
We no longer use "SAGE". The days of that capitalization are over. Now use "Sage" instead.
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
- Cc wstein mvngu added
I object to including this as standard just because of consistency concerns - I think this needs a vote on sage-devel.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
Note: I said "Positive review from me as far as I can tell, as an optional package. "
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
The proposal here is to merge the SPKG in the optional packages repository.
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
I forgot all about the voting process I immediately send a message on Sage-devel about it.
This package has to be included in the --standard-- package repository if we want Sage to have any native LP feature ( see #6502 ). Coin-or and Cplex are both GPL-uncompatible ;-)
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
The vote is going on there : http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/fed15c54478e8d5
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by
I could be wrong but I think trac is for optional packages. IIRC, once it is optional (ie, posted to http://www.sagemath.org/packages/optional/) then a public vote is carried out on sage-devel.
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by
I did not know that !!!
I'm pretty new aboard, and the only thing I wrote for Sage was an interface for Cliquer, which has seemingly found a shortcut through all these steps ;-)
I may be in a hurry, but it is just because :
- I am impatient to see this patch accepted
- I have already written several graph functions waiting to be included in the Graph class that I will not post until MIP is included into Sage
Sorry again ! I'll try to be a bit more patient ;-)
comment:13 Changed 9 years ago by
- Component changed from numerical to optional packages
- Owner changed from jkantor to tbd
comment:14 Changed 9 years ago by
- Merged in set to Sage 4.1.1.rc1
- Milestone set to sage-4.1.1
- Resolution set to fixed
- Reviewers set to David Joyner
- Status changed from new to closed
Merged in optional packages repository. The new optional package can be found here:
I'm not sure what needs to be checked here. It installs fine on an amd64 ubuntu 9.04 machine and passes sage -testall.
Are there any tests I should run? I saw nothing on the url given in the ticket but I am not an OR person.
Positive review from me as far as I can tell, as an optional package.