#6564 closed defect (fixed)
[with spkg, positive review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris.
| Reported by: | drkirkby | Owned by: | drkirkby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-4.1.2 |
| Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | solaris ecl config.h |
| Cc: | Merged in: | Sage 4.1.2.alpha0 | |
| Authors: | David Kirkby | Reviewers: | Adam Webb, Alex Ghitza, Minh Van Nguyen |
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Status badges
Description
I've not looked into debugging this yet, but ecl fails on Solaris. This is on a Sun Blade 2000 - not 't2' though I expect it would fail on that too.
It looks like a failure to remove the non-existant file config.h is causing this. Perhaps rm -f would be acceptable?? It's possible that rm on Solaris exits with a non-zero exit code if it can't delete a file, but on other systems this does not happen. I don't know, and have not investigated yet.
See below.
sed '/-CUT-/,$d' ./ecl/config.h > ./ecl/config-install.h /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/src/install.sh -c -m 644 ./ecl/*.h /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/local/include//ecl if (echo c | grep gc); then \ /bin/bash /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/src/mkinstalldirs /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/local/include//ecl/gc/private; \ /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/src/install.sh -c -m 644 ./ecl/gc/*.h /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/local/include//ecl/gc; \ /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/src/install.sh -c -m 644 ./ecl/gc/private/*.h /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/local/include//ecl/gc/private; \ fi rm /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/local/include//ecl/config.h /export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/local/include//ecl/config.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [install-base] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/build' make[2]: *** [install] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/drkirkby/sage/sage-4.1/spkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src' Failed to install ECL ... exiting real 8m24.691s user 7m7.665s sys 1m2.739s sage: An error occurred while installing ecl-9.4.1
Attachments (3)
Change History (26)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from tbd to drkirkby |
|---|
Changed 14 years ago by
| Attachment: | install.log added |
|---|
install.log showing ecl failure due to missing config.h
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
The attached install.log was created on 't2', a Sun T5240, with Sage-4.1.1.alpha0, whereas the first output I showed was created on my own Sun Blade 2000 with Sage-4.1. (Both used the same version of Solaris)
(Note the Blade 2000 took about half the time of the T5240 to do this task), which shows the T5240 is not ideally suited to the sort of things currently being used for, but with more users, its performance will shine.)
I see a few warnings - see below. What is clear is that the build often complains about things redefined in {{{ $SAGE_HOMEspkg/build/ecl-9.4.1/src/build/ecl/config.h }}} but I see no record of that file ever being copied to
$SAGE_HOME/local/include//ecl/config.
Anyways, here are some warnings noted.
1) Unknown symbol: mp::*current-process* Unknown symbol: mp::+load-compile-lock+ Unknown symbol: mp::+load-compile-lock+ Unknown symbol: si::pretty-print-format 2) warning: "ecl_int16_t" redefined 3) warning: "ecl_int32_t" redefined 4) ;;; Removing unused variable PPN 5) ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;setf.lsp, position 4, and form ;;; (FSET 'GET-SETF-EXPANSION #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK GET-SETF-EXPANSION # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP 6) Quite a few reports of ";;; Note: Eliminating unreachable code" 7) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP 8) ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;assert.lsp, position 9, and form ;;; (FSET 'ACCUMULATE-CASES #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK ACCUMULATE-CASES # ...)) ;;; The variable MACRO-NAME is not used. 9) ;;; Note: in file src:lsp;seqlib.lsp, position 3, and form ;;; (FSET 'UNSAFE-FUNCALL1 #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK UNSAFE-FUNCALL1 # ...)) ;;; In function UNSAFE-FUNCALL1, checking types of arguments X F. ;;; Note: in file src:lsp;seqlib.lsp, position 3, and form ;;; (FSET 'UNSAFE-FUNCALL1 #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK UNSAFE-FUNCALL1 # ...)) ;;; Unable to emit check for variable (OPTIONAL-CHECK-TYPE F FUNCTION) 10) ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;describe.lsp, position 31, and form ;;; (FSET 'PRINT-DOC #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK PRINT-DOC # ...)) ;;; Too few arguments for proclaimed function GET-SYSPROP 11) ;;; Warning: in file src:lsp;top.lsp, position 43, and form ;;; (FSET 'TPL-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION-COMMAND #'(LAMBDA-BLOCK TPL-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION-COMMAND # ...)) ;;; The variable NO-VALUES is not used.
Changed 14 years ago by
| Attachment: | install.2.log added |
|---|
A second attampt after touching the missing file. The build stops earlier, which is odd
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
I attached a copy of the complete ecl part of install.log, but this time after I touched the file $SAGE_HOME/local/include/ecl/config.h first
What is odd, is that the build process aborted earlier (the log file is 379 kB, rather than the 0.7 MB ealier).
I've tried downloading version 9.4.1 of ECL (as used in Sage) from the site at http://ecls.sourceforge.net/ The build of that failed. (I can't recall exactly where). I also downloaded the latest ECL (9.7.1) and that failed too. Finally I tried the latest snaphot via CVS and that would not build.
I've reported this on the ECL tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2824044&group_id=30035&atid=398054
and the ECL mailing list https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2824200&group_id=30035&atid=398054
Neither has received any response in the 4 to 5 days since I reported this.
Has anyone got any idea what we might do to resolve this issue?
Dave
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
A new version of ECL (9.8.1) has been released. I've created a package at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1/ecl-9.8.1.spkg
It is NOT ready for review yet, as I know Maxima will break with this, due to a bug in Maxima.
Dave
comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by
Here is an updated .spkg for ECL, which fixes the bugs which prevent ECL building on Solaris SPARC.
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1/ecl-9.8.1.spkg
I've created a new Maxima.spkg based on the latest 5.19.0 (trac #6999)
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/maxima-5.19.0/maxima-5.19.0.spkg
If this updated ECL is applied, then the update to Maxima must be made, as this new ECL will not build Maxima due to a 35-year old bug in Maxima (confirmed by the Maxima developers).
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by
| Summary: | ecl will not build on Solaris - looks like make exiting when it tries to delete non-existant file. → [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.1, needed for Solaris. |
|---|
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by
| Summary: | [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.1, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg; needs work] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.1, needed for Solaris. |
|---|
There is a bug in ECL which is causing test failures. The bug has been identified by Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll and I intend implementing his change and making a new .spkg within the next 18 hours (at the very most - probably less than 3 hours).
Dave
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by
| Milestone: | sage-4.1.1 → sage-4.1.2 |
|---|---|
| Summary: | [with spkg; needs work] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.1, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.1, needed for Solaris. |
The bug has been corrected. Some other changes were made to spkg-install too. See relevant files at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1
The ecl spkg file is:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1/ecl-9.8.1.spkg
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by
| Summary: | [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.1, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.3, needed for Solaris. |
|---|
There has been another update to ECL - it is now version 9.8.3 The files may be found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.3
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by
| Component: | solaris → packages |
|---|
comment:12 Changed 13 years ago by
I don't have access to solaris but I tried on 32-bit scientific linux. I had problems with ecl-9.8.1 but ecl-9.8.3.spkg installed without problems. I used it to compile maxima-5.19.0 (#6699) and fricas-1.0.7. Both packages compiled and installed. The tests in various interface files: lisp.py, fricas.py, axiom.py all passed. There were issues with maxima.py but I think that is a maxima problem and not an ecl one.
Adam
comment:14 Changed 13 years ago by
Two small things.
- There is already an ecl 9.8.4 which has some bug fixes and can be dropped into the spkg.
- There are uncommitted changes to the mercurial repository in the spkg.
Adam
comment:15 follow-up: 17 Changed 13 years ago by
I've updated the .spkg file to the latest http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.4/ release. I've not committed this since I don't know exactly how to - I've had a few problems. It is something I need to look at again. If someone could do that bit for me.
comment:16 Changed 13 years ago by
| Summary: | [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.3, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. |
|---|
comment:17 Changed 13 years ago by
Replying to drkirkby:
I've updated the .spkg file to the latest http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.4/ release. I've not committed this since I don't know exactly how to - I've had a few problems. It is something I need to look at again. If someone could do that bit for me.
Done, and placed the new spkg at
comment:18 Changed 13 years ago by
| Reviewers: | → Adam Webb |
|---|---|
| Summary: | [with spkg; needs review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg; positive review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. |
I ran the same tests with the new package and everything worked. The package built and ran both maxima and fricas on 32 and 64 bit linux. Someone might want to check on Solaris and Mac but it looks good to me.
Adam
Changed 13 years ago by
| Attachment: | doctest-mvngu.log added |
|---|
full log of doctest failures due to new ecl + maxima
comment:19 Changed 13 years ago by
| Summary: | [with spkg; positive review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg, needs work] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. |
|---|
I've copied AlexGhitza?'s ECL and Maxima packages to my home directory:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/ecl-9.8.4.spkg
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/maxima-5.19.1.p0.spkg
These updated spkg's build fine on sage.math. But I get the following doctest failures:
sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sagedoc.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py # 17 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/en/constructions/plotting.rst # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/fr/tutorial/tour_algebra.rst # 4 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/en/tutorial/tour_algebra.rst # 4 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/symbolic/assumptions.py # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/en/constructions/interface_issues.rst # 3 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/functional.py # 2 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/en/constructions/linear_algebra.rst # 3 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/en/constructions/calculus.rst # 1 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/fr/tutorial/interfaces.rst # 11 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage-main/doc/en/tutorial/interfaces.rst # 11 doctests failed
A full doctest log is attached to this ticket; see doctest-mvngu.log. I'm marking this ticket and #6699 as "needs work". Once the doctest failures are resolved, both of these tickets can be restored to "positive review".
comment:20 Changed 13 years ago by
| Summary: | [with spkg, needs work] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. → [with spkg, positive review] Update ECL to the latest 9.8.4, needed for Solaris. |
|---|
Oh... I didn't apply the patch at #6699. No wonder I got the doctest failures.
comment:21 Changed 13 years ago by
| Authors: | → David Kirkby |
|---|---|
| Merged in: | → Sage 4.1.2.alpha0 |
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Reviewers: | Adam Webb → Adam Webb, Alex Ghitza, Minh Van Nguyen |
| Status: | new → closed |
Here are the results of my test on various platforms. For each of the reported platforms, I first installed ecl-9.8.4.spkg, then maxima-5.19.1.spkg, followed by applying the patch maxima_doctests.patch at #6699.
- sage.math --- compile: yes; doctests pass: yes.
- t2.math --- compile: yes; doctests pass: I don't know. I compiled Sage 4.1.1 on t2.math using GCC 4.4.1 with the Sun linker. As I reported before on sage-devel, the compilation fails when building the package sage-4.1.1.spkg. It's good enough that both ecl-9.8.4.spkg and maxima-5.19.1.spkg built successfully.
- bsd.math 32-bit Mac OS X 10.5.8 --- compile: yes; doctests pass: yes.
- bsd.math Mac OS X 10.5.8 in 64-bit mode --- compile: yes. The following doctests failed:
sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/lib.macosx-10.3-i386-2.6/sage/graphs/graph.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/lib.macosx-10.3-i386-2.6/sage/graphs/graph_coloring.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/sage/graphs/cliquer.pyx" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/sage/graphs/graph.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/sage/graphs/graph_coloring.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/sage/groups/perm_gps/partn_ref/refinement_graphs.pyx" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/build/sage/interfaces/sage0.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/birds_other.rst" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/cliquer.pyx" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph_coloring.py" sage -t -long "64/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/groups/perm_gps/partn_ref/refinement_graphs.pyx"
The failures relating to graph theory modules are expected failures, as cliquer is known to fail to build under OS X 10.5.8 in 64-bit mode and under various 64-bit platforms. At least I'm glad that ecl-9.8.4.spkg and maxima-5.19.1.spkg successfully compile in 64-bit mode.
- Fedora 9 x86 GCC 4.4.1 (cicero on SkyNet?) --- compile: yes; doctests pass: no, I got some doctest failures:
sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/misc/randstate.pyx" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/randstate.pyx", line 124: : s = ZZ(subsage('initial_seed()')) Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_0[32]>", line 1, in <module> s = ZZ(subsage('initial_seed()'))###line 124: : s = ZZ(subsage('initial_seed()')) File "parent.pyx", line 323, in sage.structure.parent.Parent.__call__ (sage/structure/parent.c:4171) File "coerce_maps.pyx", line 156, in sage.structure.coerce_maps.NamedConvertMap._call_ (sage/structure/coerce_maps.c:4064) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 1726, in _integer_ return sage.rings.all.Integer(repr(self)) File "integer.pyx", line 569, in sage.rings.integer.Integer.__init__ (sage/rings/integer.c:6444) TypeError: unable to convert x (=--------------------------------------------------------------------------- AttributeError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/mvngu/.sage/temp/cicero/15775/_home_mvngu__sage_init_sage_0.py in <module>() /home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/misc/functional.pyc in gen(x) 353 Return the generator of x. 354 """ --> 355 return x.gen() 356 357 def gens(x): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'gen') to an integer ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/randstate.pyx", line 131: : r == ZZ.random_element(2^200) Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** 1 items had failures: 2 of 62 in __main__.example_0 ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_randstate.py [19.7 s] sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/expect.py" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 805: sage: print sage0.eval("alarm(1); singular._expect_expr('1')") Expected: Control-C pressed. Interrupting Singular. Please wait a few seconds... ... KeyboardInterrupt: computation timed out because alarm was set for 1 seconds Got: ^[[0m ********************************************************************** 1 items had failures: 1 of 10 in __main__.example_15 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_expect.py [14.7 s] sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 55: sage: a^3 Expected: 8 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 62: sage: V.gens() Expected: ((1, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 0, 1)) Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 75: sage: g = V.0; g Expected: (1, 0, 0, 0) Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 85: sage: s('%s.parent()'%g.name()) Expected: Vector space of dimension 4 over Rational Field Got: (1, 0, 0, 0) ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 93: sage: s('x = 5') Expected: 5 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 97: sage: s('x') Expected: 5 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 105: sage: a Expected: 10 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 114: sage: s3('"x"') Expected: 8 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 116: sage: s('x') Expected: 5 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 320: sage: sage0.eval('2+2') Expected: '4' Got: '\x1b[0m' ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 334: sage: sage0.get('x') Expected: '2' Got: '4' ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 364: sage: sage0.get('x') Expected: "...NameError: name 'x' is not defined" Got: '2' ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 373: sage: sage0._contains('2', 'QQ') Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 397: sage: sage0.version() Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_16[2]>", line 1, in <module> sage0.version()###line 397: sage: sage0.version() File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 402, in version return sage0_version() File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 547, in sage0_version return str(sage0('version()')) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 263, in __call__ return SageElement(self, x) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 1433, in __init__ raise TypeError, x TypeError: Error executing code in Sage CODE: sage0=version() Sage ERROR: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NameError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/mvngu/.sage/temp/cicero/10033/_home_mvngu__sage_init_sage_0.py in <module>() NameError: name 'x' is not defined ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 399: sage: sage0.version() == version() Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_16[3]>", line 1, in <module> sage0.version() == version()###line 399: sage: sage0.version() == version() File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 402, in version return sage0_version() File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 547, in sage0_version return str(sage0('version()')) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 1592, in __repr__ s = s.replace(self._name, self.__dict__['__custom_name']) KeyError: '__custom_name' ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 417: sage: sage0.new(2) Expected: 2 Got: Sage Version 4.1.1, Release Date: 2009-08-14 ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 445: sage: F == sage0(F)._sage_() Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_20[4]>", line 1, in <module> F == sage0(F)._sage_()###line 445: sage: F == sage0(F)._sage_() File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 455, in _sage_ return load(P._local_tmpfile()) File "sage_object.pyx", line 529, in sage.structure.sage_object.load (sage/structure/sage_object.c:6504) IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mvngu/.sage//temp/cicero/9862//interface//tmp9862.sobj' ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 463: sage: four_gcd(6) Expected: 2 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 486: sage: sage0(4).gcd Expected: <built-in method gcd of sage.rings.integer.Integer object at 0x...> Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 512: sage: half = reduce_load_element(s); half Expected: 1/2 Got: <BLANKLINE> ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 544: sage: sage0_version() == version() Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 174: sage: print "ignore this"; sage0.cputime() # random output Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_3[2]>", line 1, in <module> print "ignore this"; sage0.cputime() # random output###line 174: sage: print "ignore this"; sage0.cputime() # random output File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 185, in cputime return float(s) ValueError: invalid literal for float(): e(None ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 176: sage: sage0('factor(2^157-1)') Expected: 852133201 * 60726444167 * 1654058017289 * 2134387368610417 Got: 4.3093440000000003 ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 178: sage: print "ignore this"; sage0.cputime() # random output Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_3[4]>", line 1, in <module> print "ignore this"; sage0.cputime() # random output###line 178: sage: print "ignore this"; sage0.cputime() # random output File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python/site-packages/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 185, in cputime return float(s) ValueError: empty string for float() ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 192: sage: len(t) > 100 Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_4[3]>", line 1, in <module> len(t) > Integer(100)###line 192: sage: len(t) > 100 TypeError: object of type 'long' has no len() ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 194: sage: 'gcd' in t Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags) File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "<doctest __main__.example_4[4]>", line 1, in <module> 'gcd' in t###line 194: sage: 'gcd' in t TypeError: argument of type 'long' is not iterable ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/sage0.py", line 204: sage: s.eval('2+2') Expected: '4' Got: '\x1b[0m' ********************************************************************** 15 items had failures: 9 of 23 in __main__.example_1 1 of 3 in __main__.example_10 1 of 4 in __main__.example_11 1 of 6 in __main__.example_13 1 of 3 in __main__.example_14 2 of 4 in __main__.example_16 1 of 4 in __main__.example_18 1 of 5 in __main__.example_20 1 of 4 in __main__.example_21 1 of 3 in __main__.example_22 1 of 6 in __main__.example_24 1 of 4 in __main__.example_26 3 of 5 in __main__.example_3 2 of 5 in __main__.example_4 1 of 5 in __main__.example_5 ***Test Failed*** 27 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_sage0.py [20.5 s] sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py", line 934: sage: 'gcd' in t Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py", line 2182: sage: 'gcd' in m.trait_names() Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** 2 items had failures: 1 of 5 in __main__.example_18 1 of 4 in __main__.example_68 ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/mvngu/usr/cicero/bin/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_maxima.py [32.9 s]
- Fedora 9 x86_64 GCC 4.4.1 (eno on SkyNet?) --- compile: yes; doctests pass: no, I got some doctest failures:
sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix_space.py" A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have crashed doctest. [0.9 s] sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/eno/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py", line 934: sage: 'gcd' in t Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/eno/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py", line 2182: sage: 'gcd' in m.trait_names() Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** 2 items had failures: 1 of 5 in __main__.example_18 1 of 4 in __main__.example_68 ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/mvngu/usr/eno/bin/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_maxima.py [14.5 s]
- RHEL Server 5.3 x86_64-k10 GeForce? GPUs GCC 4.4.1 (lena on SkyNet?) --- compile: yes; doctests pass: no, I got some doctest failures:
sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/lena/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py", line 934: sage: 'gcd' in t Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** File "/home/mvngu/usr/lena/bin/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py", line 2182: sage: 'gcd' in m.trait_names() Expected: True Got: False ********************************************************************** 2 items had failures: 1 of 5 in __main__.example_18 1 of 4 in __main__.example_68 ***Test Failed*** 2 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /home/mvngu/usr/lena/bin/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_maxima.py [15.8 s]
For each of the above Fedora/Red? Hat platforms, the common failure is in this file:
sage -t -long "devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/maxima.py"
The relevant doctests that result in the failures are:
def trait_names(self, verbose=True, use_disk_cache=True):
"""
Return all Maxima commands, which is useful for tab completion.
EXAMPLES::
sage: t = maxima.trait_names(verbose=False)
sage: 'gcd' in t
True
sage: len(t) # random output
1840
"""
and
def trait_names(self, verbose=False):
"""
Return all Maxima commands, which is useful for tab completion.
EXAMPLES::
sage: m = maxima(2)
sage: 'gcd' in m.trait_names()
True
"""
A work around is to change the first doctest to:
def trait_names(self, verbose=True, use_disk_cache=True):
"""
Return all Maxima commands, which is useful for tab completion.
EXAMPLES::
sage: t = maxima.trait_names(verbose=False, use_disk_cache=False)
sage: 'gcd' in t
True
sage: len(t) # random output
1840
"""
But overall, I'm happy that the updated ECL and Maxima packages at least build on sage.math, OS X in both 32- and 64-bit modes, Solaris on t2.math, and various Fedora/Red? Hat platforms. Merged the package ecl-9.8.4.spkg in the standard packages repository.
comment:22 Changed 13 years ago by
The failures of the type "gcd in t" are due to the fact that the new Maxima spkg has more commands than the old, but the old list is cached in the user's .sage directory. So one solution is to remove that file, then test again (if the file is not found, it is generated automatically, this time with the correct contents).
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Creating an empty file $SAGE_HOME/local/include/ecl/config.h does allow the build of ECL to progress further, but it does not result in a working ecl installation. The build of ecl still fails. Whether that is a result of this problem I do not know, but I suspect not. Hence that error will be reported as another trac ticket.