Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#5544 new defect
multipolynomial __call__ not consistent
Reported by: | robertwb | Owned by: | tbd |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-6.4 |
Component: | algebra | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: | todo |
Description
sage: parent(RR['x,y'].gen(1)(0,CC.0)) Complex Field with 53 bits of precision sage: parent(RR['x,y'](0)(0,0)) Integer Ring sage: parent(RR['x,y'](0)(0,CC.0)) Integer Ring sage: parent(RR['x,y'](1)(0,CC.0)) Real Field with 53 bits of precision sage: parent(QQ['x,y'](1)(0,CC.0)) Rational Field sage: parent(QQ['x,y'](0)(0,0)) Rational Field sage: parent(QQ['x,y'](0)(0,CC.0)) Rational Field sage: parent(QQ['x,y'].gen(1)(0,CC.0)) Complex Field with 53 bits of precision
The result should not depend on the specific polynomial, only on its parent and the parent of the inputs.
Univariate ones get it right:
sage: sage: parent(RR['x'](0)(0)) Real Field with 53 bits of precision sage: sage: parent(RR['x'](0)(CC.0)) Complex Field with 53 bits of precision
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
- Summary changed from multipolynomial __call__ not consistant to multipolynomial __call__ not consistent
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4
comment:7 Changed 3 years ago by
- Report Upstream set to N/A
- Stopgaps set to todo
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
According to this definition, there are bugs in univariate polynomials as well: