#5187 closed defect (duplicate)
fix optional magma doctests that changed in magma-2.15
Reported by: | was | Owned by: | was |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | interfaces | Keywords: | sd32 |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Mariah Lenox | Reviewers: | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
The latest version of Magma is Magma-2.15, and there are doctests all over that now slightly fail because the output format of certain things in Magma has changed.
The file at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/patches/magma-2.15.txt lists all the doctest failures. It was got by running this script:
sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ring_generic.pyx" sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/term_order.py" sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py" sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/mpolynomialsystem.py" sage -t -only_optional=magma "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/magma.py"
on eno, which has Magma-2.15.
I think all the changes are purely cosmetic, so this should be very straightforward (but tedious).
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-4.7 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Report Upstream set to N/A
- Status changed from new to needs_review
I believe this ticket can be closed as it is superceded by #7870.
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from needs_review to closed
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
- Keywords sd32 added
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
It all seems to be
vs
and
vs
The question is: Do we make 2.15 the only officially blessed release or do we add a sufficient amount of dots to make the tests also pass with 2.13 to 2.14?
Cheers,
Michael