Opened 13 years ago

Closed 15 months ago

#5127 closed defect (invalid)

relative number fields have bad names for internal coercion routines

Reported by: ncalexan Owned by: davidloeffler
Priority: major Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: number fields Keywords: relative number fields names coercion
Cc: roed, tscrim, mkoeppe Merged in:
Authors: Reviewers: Matthias Koeppe
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: Commit:
Dependencies: Stopgaps:

Status badges

Description

A naming one issue: in relative number fields, the family of functions coerce_non_number_field_element_in should probably be a convert function rather than a coerce one.

Change History (9)

comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by mabshoff

  • Milestone set to sage-3.3

comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by davidloeffler

  • Component changed from number theory to number fields
  • Owner changed from was to davidloeffler

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by jdemeyer

  • Milestone changed from sage-5.11 to sage-5.12

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by vbraun_spam

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.1 to sage-6.2

comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by vbraun_spam

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.2 to sage-6.3

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by vbraun_spam

  • Milestone changed from sage-6.3 to sage-6.4

comment:7 Changed 15 months ago by chapoton

  • Cc tscrim mkoeppe added
  • Milestone changed from sage-6.4 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
  • Report Upstream set to N/A
  • Status changed from new to needs_review

This has been done elsewhere, so this is now invalid.

comment:8 Changed 15 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Reviewers set to Matthias Koeppe
  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

comment:9 Changed 15 months ago by chapoton

  • Resolution set to invalid
  • Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.