#3657 closed enhancement (fixed)
[with patch, positive review] Documentation for latin squares, DLXCPP; minor fixes
| Reported by: | carlohamalainen | Owned by: | mhansen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-3.0.6 |
| Component: | combinatorics | Keywords: | editor_mhansen |
| Cc: | sage-combinat | Merged in: | |
| Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
| Report Upstream: | Work issues: | ||
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Status badges
Description
Fixed some LaTeX problems so that the docs from latin.py would compile properly, also fixed some minor things.
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
Changed 14 years ago by
Changed 14 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
- Summary changed from [with patch against 3.0.5, needs review] Documentation for latin squares, DLXCPP; minor fixes to [with patch, needs review] Documentation for latin squares, DLXCPP; minor fixes
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
- Keywords editor_mhansen added
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
- Summary changed from [with patch, needs review] Documentation for latin squares, DLXCPP; minor fixes to [with patch, positive review] Documentation for latin squares, DLXCPP; minor fixes
With the exception of patchlevel.tex as Michael noted, everything else looks good to me. The sage-main tests applies and passes tests, and the documentation builds with both patches applied.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Merged in Sage 3.0.6.alpha0
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by
- Cc sage-combinat added
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Carlo,
I have nuked the bundles. Not knowing the subject at hand I will not comment on chlatin.patch, but chlatindocs.patch looks good. The first hunk in the last patch will be removed when applying it, so don't worry about that for now.
Mike: Can you be the editor for this?
Cheers,
Michael