Opened 14 months ago

Closed 3 months ago

#31529 closed enhancement (fixed)

texlive: Add spkg-configure.m4 and system package information; remove install script

Reported by: mkoeppe Owned by:
Priority: critical Milestone: sage-9.6
Component: packages: optional Keywords: texlive, spkg-configure.m4
Cc: slelievre, jhpalmieri, vbraun, vdelecroix, slabbe, fbissey, arojas, tornaria Merged in:
Authors: Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik, Antonio Rojas, François Bissey Reviewers: Sébastien Labbé, Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik, Andrey Belgorodski
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: 7a1a1fe (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) Commit: 7a1a1fe20f22e08e4b7ea76db0a5d516ebb5e793
Dependencies: Stopgaps:

Status badges

Description (last modified by mkoeppe)

Right now presence of tex is not tested, and texlive is included in system packages of _recommended.

In this ticket, we associate the tex system package with texlive instead.

We also test presence of latex packages that are needed for building the sage pdf documentation and make texlive a dependency of sagemath_doc_pdf.

We remove the install script due to lack of use and maintenance (#21922). Installing tex should not be the concern of SageMath.

Change History (72)

comment:1 Changed 14 months ago by slelievre

To build the documentation in all languages I think we need

texlive-lang-cyrillic
texlive-lang-english
texlive-lang-european
texlive-lang-french
texlive-lang-german
texlive-lang-italian
texlive-lang-japanese
texlive-lang-polish
texlive-lang-portuguese
texlive-lang-spanish

comment:2 Changed 14 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Cc jhpalmieri added
  • Description modified (diff)
  • Summary changed from texlive: Add spkg-configure.m4 and system package information to texlive: Add spkg-configure.m4 and system package information; remove install script

comment:3 Changed 14 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:4 Changed 14 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.3 to sage-9.4

comment:5 Changed 10 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.4 to sage-9.5

comment:6 Changed 8 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Dependencies set to #31163

comment:7 Changed 8 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Branch set to u/mkoeppe/texlive__add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script

comment:8 Changed 8 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Commit set to c34cfe426573e25eb26f02d40594978ac6a81113
  • Work issues set to merge updated #31163

New commits:

2576f86build/make/Makefile.in: If a script package has no spkg-install, run "sage -info" and exit with error
feb8de7build/pkgs/: Remove spkg-install scripts for dummy script packages
8f782c0.github/workflows/tox-{optional,experimental}.yml: Do not try to test dummy script packages
ede6121Merge #31163
c34cfe4WIP

comment:9 Changed 6 months ago by dimpase

as far as I am concerned it's almost ready - I'd only ask for spkg-install printing something meaningul.

comment:10 Changed 6 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Status changed from new to needs_info

This would need info whether the package is involved in building the binary distribution.

comment:11 Changed 6 months ago by dimpase

  • Cc vbraun added

I don't think our binary builds ship TeX.

comment:12 Changed 5 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.5 to sage-9.6

Stalled in needs_review or needs_info; likely won't make it into Sage 9.5.

comment:13 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Cc vdelecroix added

comment:14 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Cc slabbe added

comment:15 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from c34cfe426573e25eb26f02d40594978ac6a81113 to 985dcf1cdbdb5276e9592ea786949dcb099c7221

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:

985dcf1WIP

comment:16 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Dependencies #31163 deleted
  • Work issues merge updated #31163 deleted

comment:17 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

The file build/pkgs/texlive/package-list.txt contains a list of packages.

$ git log --follow build/pkgs/texlive/package-list.txt 
commit 152d1348b35e23f0b675aa2eaddc09db1f8063e0
Author: Volker Braun <vbraun.name@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat Jan 9 14:15:49 2016 +0100

    Move the texlive install script to a script-type package

commit 37ca6434c6af9c72cf0e524377131aab34fa077b
Author: Volker Braun <vbraun.name@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 31 11:49:56 2015 +0200

    add two more texlive packages

commit 9f69d3af5bf8c4aeb9a53ca681786d4c1a15a1e5
Author: Volker Braun <vbraun.name@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 20 20:10:09 2015 +0100

    add tkz to texlive packages

commit ef0319feee59186bf4139673e72c1234434aeba6
Author: Volker Braun <vbraun.name@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Mar 15 20:07:06 2015 +0100

    add packages required by IPython nbconvert

commit e8ac6085104bed4bcc0b3f56e830fa806f034def
Author: Volker Braun <vbraun.name@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat Feb 28 15:12:47 2015 +0100

    Initial version of the TeXlive install script

It does not appear to be used anywhere.

comment:18 Changed 4 months ago by jhpalmieri

In the develop branch, that file is used in build/pkgs/texlive/spkg-install.py:

def install_packages():
    package_list_txt = os.path.join(
        os.path.dirname(__file__),
        'package-list.txt'
    )
    with open(package_list_txt) as f:
        package_list = f.read()
    ...

comment:19 Changed 4 months ago by jhpalmieri

But I agree, once spkg-install.py is deleted, it doesn't appear to be used.

comment:20 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Sorry, yes, that's what I meant. It's not used _otherwise_; it can give us information on what system tex packages will be needed. But I'm not sure if the file is up to date, as the last edit is from 2015.

comment:21 Changed 4 months ago by vbraun

Its not up to date but the necessary changes are going to be relatively small, I don't remember needing any extra packages except for the japanese tour.

comment:22 Changed 4 months ago by slabbe

Just to say that with 9.5.rc4, the current sage -i texlive is broken for me and finishes with:

[texlive-none] Traceback (most recent call last):
[texlive-none]   File "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/build/pkgs/texlive/spkg-install.py", line 133, in <module>
[texlive-none]     install_packages()
[texlive-none]   File "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/build/pkgs/texlive/spkg-install.py", line 122, in install_packages
[texlive-none]     check_call(['tlmgr', 'install'] + packages)
[texlive-none]   File "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/lib/python3.9/subprocess.py", line 373, in check_call
[texlive-none]     raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
[texlive-none] subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['tlmgr', 'install', 'latex', 'titlesec', 'framed', 'threeparttable', 'wrapfig', 'multirow', 'makecmds', 'collection-fontsrecommended', 'tkz-berge', 'tkz-graph', 'cmap', 'fancybox', 'fancyvrb', 'mdwtools', 'parskip', 'jknapltx', 'etoolbox', 'adjustbox', 'xkeyval', 'booktabs', 'collectbox', 'ucs', 'collection-langcyrillic', 'babel-basque', 'babel-catalan', 'babel-czech', 'babel-english', 'babel-french', 'babel-galician', 'babel-german', 'babel-hungarian', 'babel-italian', 'babel-polish', 'babel-portuges', 'babel-russian', 'babel-slovak', 'babel-spanish', 'jsclasses', 'ptex']' returned non-zero exit status 2.
Makefile:2885: recipe for target 'texlive-SAGE_LOCAL-no-deps' failed
make[2]: *** [texlive-SAGE_LOCAL-no-deps] Error 1

I am fine with removing a broken install script. Is the status still "needs info"?

comment:23 Changed 4 months ago by slabbe

With the branch, sage -i texlive says:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG texlive...
checking for latex package required_latex_packages... no
configure: will use system package and not install SPKG texlive
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is it normal that it says "no" instead of "yes"?

comment:24 Changed 4 months ago by dimpase

no, this looks like a bug in m4 code.

comment:25 Changed 4 months ago by dimpase

I'll push a fix soon.

comment:26 Changed 4 months ago by dimpase

  • Branch changed from u/mkoeppe/texlive__add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script to u/dimpase/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script
  • Commit changed from 985dcf1cdbdb5276e9592ea786949dcb099c7221 to 9dceb3445d3c353ba42fe660dec89b98cd1d0732
  • Status changed from needs_info to needs_review

New commits:

5d35b97WIP
9dceb34fix M4 bugs

comment:27 Changed 4 months ago by slabbe

ok, I now see:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG texlive...
checking for latex package fontspec... yes
checking for latex package xunicode... yes
checking for latex package xltxtra... yes
checking for latex package amssymb... yes
checking for latex package amsfonts... yes
checking for latex package graphicx... yes
checking for latex package mathrsfs... yes
checking for latex package textcomp... yes
checking for latex package tikz... yes
checking for latex package tikz-qtree... yes
checking for latex package iftex... yes
checking for latex package tkz-berge... yes
checking for latex package tkz-graph... yes
checking for latex package xy... yes
checking for latex package babel... yes
checking for latex package subfigure... yes
checking for latex package hyperref... yes
checking for latex package hypcap... yes
checking for latex package xr... yes
configure: will use system package and not install SPKG texlive
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

comment:28 Changed 4 months ago by slabbe

  • Authors set to Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik
  • Reviewers set to Sébastien Labbé

comment:29 Changed 4 months ago by slabbe

  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

on github patchbot, code style check with relint fails with 2000 lines of the form

1294>        from sage.graphs.all import Graph
sage/groups/perm_gps/partn_ref/refinement_graphs.pyx:1564 namespace_pkg_all_import: import from .all of a namespace package
Hint: Sage library code should not import from sage.PAC.KAGE.all when sage.PAC.KAGE is an implicit
Hint: namespace package. Type import_statements("SOME_IDENTIFIER") to find a more specific import.

This is unrelated to the current ticket.

comment:30 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Status changed from positive_review to needs_work

Our PDF docbuild also needs latexmk (as seen in the failure in https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/4960465123?check_suite_focus=true), so spkg-configure.m4 should check for this executable

And system package information (for debian, fedora, ...) needs to be added as the ticket promised

Last edited 4 months ago by mkoeppe (previous) (diff)

comment:31 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Branch changed from u/dimpase/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script to u/mkoeppe/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script

comment:32 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Commit changed from 9dceb3445d3c353ba42fe660dec89b98cd1d0732 to 65d67d190815985249e00f4b760cc176e0e11cbe

Here's a rough draft of the system package information. Unknown whether necessary or sufficient


New commits:

65d67d1build/pkgs/texlive/distros: Add *.txt

comment:33 Changed 4 months ago by slabbe

  • Work issues set to spkg-configure.m4 should check for latexmk executable

ok

comment:34 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

What I added for Debian/Ubuntu? is not sufficient:

  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none] error installing, exit status 2. End of log file:
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   Enter file name: 
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   ! Emergency stop.
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   <read *> 
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]            
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   l.37 \usepackage
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]                   {tgheros}^^M
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   !  ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   Transcript written on a_tour_of_sage.log.
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   Latexmk: Missing input file: 'tgtermes.sty' from line
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]     '! LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found.'
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   Collected error summary (may duplicate other messages):
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]     pdflatex: Command for 'pdflatex' gave return code 1
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]         Refer to 'a_tour_of_sage.log' for details

https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/4962385749?check_suite_focus=true

comment:35 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

I forgot that build/pkgs/_recommended/distros/*.txt has some lines with the needed system packages - which should be moved into into build/pkgs/texlive/distros

comment:36 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 65d67d190815985249e00f4b760cc176e0e11cbe to 79852ce189cf641477685dacda97da5384653497

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

5733f4ebuild/pkgs/texlive/distros/debian.txt: Move texlive system packages here from build/pkgs/_recommended/distros/debian.txt
79852cesrc/doc/bootstrap: Add texlive to RECOMMENDED_SYSTEM_PACKAGES

comment:37 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Still the same error in the PDF build after adding texlive-latex-extra.

According to https://bugs.debian.org/997448, package tex-gyre provides what is needed

comment:38 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 79852ce189cf641477685dacda97da5384653497 to b1c705b73278b93aa09bae79c890df3f8f2403fc

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

b1c705bbuild/pkgs/texlive/distros/debian.txt: Add more

comment:39 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Any takers for the other distributions?

comment:40 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Cc fbissey arojas added

comment:41 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Next failure on ubuntu-focal:

/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map source abbreviation  for rsfs10.
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c/mktexnam: Need to update ?
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input rsfs10
This is METAFONT, Version 2.7182818 (TeX Live 2019/Debian) (preloaded base=mf)

kpathsea: Running mktexmf rsfs10

! I can't find file `rsfs10'.

comment:43 Changed 4 months ago by fbissey

Just reading the git branch so far. How do we deal with language support? Do binary distro just ship all languages in one drop? In Gentoo languages are split and associated with the languages you may decide to setup your system for. If you want to build all the languages in sage you need to have L10N="ca de en es fr hu it ja pt ru tr" when you install texlive, it brings all those

[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langcjk (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Chinese/Japanese/Korean (base)
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langcyrillic (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Cyrillic
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langenglish (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive US and UK English
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langeuropean (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Other European languages
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langfrench (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive French
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langgerman (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive German
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langitalian (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Italian
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langjapanese (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Japanese
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langportuguese (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Portuguese
[I] dev-texlive/texlive-langspanish (2021@08/23/21): TeXLive Spanish

comment:44 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from b1c705b73278b93aa09bae79c890df3f8f2403fc to 7e317b2a596acd44a68a2a8ca3f84f0b45ee11cb

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

7e317b2build/pkgs/texlive/distros/debian.txt: Add texlive-fonts-recommended

comment:45 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 7e317b2a596acd44a68a2a8ca3f84f0b45ee11cb to 37d569de786f1c252f09f9aacca48540aa278680

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

37d569dbuild/pkgs/texlive/distros/debian.txt: Add texlive-lang-*

comment:46 Changed 4 months ago by arojas

  • Branch changed from u/mkoeppe/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script to u/arojas/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script

comment:47 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Commit changed from 37d569de786f1c252f09f9aacca48540aa278680 to 1dc511c20412fd8cb914ea6d798b4c3c34096ec7

On fedora-26:

  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   l.43 \usepackage
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]                   {sphinx}^^M
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   !  ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   Transcript written on faq.log.
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   ===========Latexmk: Missing input file: 'fncychap.sty' from line
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]     '! LaTeX Error: File `fncychap.sty' not found.'
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]   Latexmk: Missing input file: 'fncychap.sty' from line
  [sagemath_doc_pdf-none]     '! LaTeX Error: File `fncychap.sty' not found.'

New commits:

1dc511cAdd Arch package info

comment:48 Changed 4 months ago by fbissey

That's from texlive-latexextra.

comment:49 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Branch changed from u/arojas/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script to u/mkoeppe/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script

comment:50 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Authors changed from Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik to Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik, Antonio Rojas
  • Commit changed from 1dc511c20412fd8cb914ea6d798b4c3c34096ec7 to a50548772c74a04901c44e563c3d7cc5a47e6608

New commits:

a505487build/pkgs/texlive/distros/fedora.txt: Add texlive-collection-latexextra

comment:51 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from a50548772c74a04901c44e563c3d7cc5a47e6608 to 7daedd97d05d1820b828ae5baf3dae0c20df3f1c

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

7daedd9build/pkgs/texlive/distros/fedora.txt: Add texlive-collection-lang*

comment:52 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Fedora now works, as tested with TARGETS_PRE=build-local tox -e docker-fedora-34-recommended -- doc-pdf

comment:53 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 7daedd97d05d1820b828ae5baf3dae0c20df3f1c to 62fbc45faba4a9e95d851f92bcb1c19d3bc50021

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

6952de4build/pkgs/texlive/spkg-configure.m4: Check for pdflatex, latexmk, dvipng
b85356fbuild/pkgs/texlive/spkg-configure.m4: Check for tgtermes.sty
62fbc45build/pkgs/sagemath_doc_pdf/dependencies: Add texlive

comment:54 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
  • Work issues spkg-configure.m4 should check for latexmk executable deleted

comment:55 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 62fbc45faba4a9e95d851f92bcb1c19d3bc50021 to e63b9f293d779c630f802cf8ff7622d8bfd45d84

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

e63b9f2Merge tag '9.5' into t/31529/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script

comment:56 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from e63b9f293d779c630f802cf8ff7622d8bfd45d84 to 8b2490e6f6aa700462a97bfc827855c80218c1b0

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

8b2490ebuild/pkgs/texlive/spkg-configure.m4: ALso check for fncychap.sty

comment:57 follow-up: Changed 4 months ago by fbissey

  • Branch changed from u/mkoeppe/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script to u/fbissey/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script
  • Commit changed from 8b2490e6f6aa700462a97bfc827855c80218c1b0 to 7b97dd40a69ce62d908849a7ab9b3f5418dc0600

Should add the Gentoo stuff before it gets reviewed.


New commits:

7b97dd4update list of gentoo packages

comment:58 Changed 4 months ago by fbissey

  • Authors changed from Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik, Antonio Rojas to Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik, Antonio Rojas, François Bissey

comment:59 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Cc tornaria added

comment:60 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:61 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Reviewers changed from Sébastien Labbé to Sébastien Labbé, Matthias Koeppe

comment:62 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Let's get this in

comment:63 Changed 4 months ago by dimpase

  • Reviewers changed from Sébastien Labbé, Matthias Koeppe to Sébastien Labbé, Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik
  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

good to go

comment:64 Changed 4 months ago by mkoeppe

Thanks!

comment:65 in reply to: ↑ 57 Changed 4 months ago by gh-sheerluck

Replying to fbissey:

Should add the Gentoo stuff before it gets reviewed.

I think gentoo.txt needs app-text/dvipng:

Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG texlive...
checking for pdflatex... /usr/bin/pdflatex
checking for latexmk... /usr/bin/latexmk
checking for dvipng... no                <--------- HERE!
checking for latex package fontspec... yes
checking for latex package xunicode... yes
checking for latex package xltxtra... yes
checking for latex package amssymb... yes
checking for latex package amsfonts... yes
checking for latex package graphicx... yes
checking for latex package mathrsfs... yes
checking for latex package textcomp... yes
checking for latex package tikz... yes
checking for latex package tikz-qtree... yes
checking for latex package iftex... yes
checking for latex package tkz-berge... yes
checking for latex package tkz-graph... yes
checking for latex package xy... yes
checking for latex package babel... yes
checking for latex package subfigure... yes
checking for latex package hyperref... yes
checking for latex package hypcap... yes
checking for latex package xr... yes
checking for latex package tgtermes... yes
checking for latex package fncychap... yes
configure: no suitable system package found for SPKG texlive

comment:66 Changed 4 months ago by fbissey

darn missed that. It is a dependency of texlive if you have the png useflag which is of course not guaranteed by the distro file.

comment:67 Changed 4 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 7b97dd40a69ce62d908849a7ab9b3f5418dc0600 to 7a1a1fe20f22e08e4b7ea76db0a5d516ebb5e793
  • Status changed from positive_review to needs_review

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:

7a1a1feadd dvipng to gentoo list of texlive related packages

comment:68 Changed 4 months ago by fbissey

@gh-sheerluck can you double check my last commit and if everything is in right order put the ticket back to positive review. You can also add your name to the reviewer field if you wish.

comment:69 Changed 4 months ago by gh-sheerluck

  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG texlive...
checking for pdflatex... /usr/bin/pdflatex
checking for latexmk... /usr/bin/latexmk
checking for dvipng... /usr/bin/dvipng
checking for latex package fontspec... yes
...
configure: will use system package and not install SPKG texlive

comment:70 Changed 4 months ago by slelievre

  • Keywords texlive spkg-configure.m4 added
  • Reviewers changed from Sébastien Labbé, Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik to Sébastien Labbé, Matthias Koeppe, Dima Pasechnik, Andrey Belgorodski

comment:71 Changed 3 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Priority changed from major to critical

comment:72 Changed 3 months ago by vbraun

  • Branch changed from u/fbissey/packages/texlive/add_spkg_configure_m4_and_system_package_information__remove_install_script to 7a1a1fe20f22e08e4b7ea76db0a5d516ebb5e793
  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.