Opened 3 months ago

Last modified 4 weeks ago

#31245 needs_review enhancement

Implement parallel f-vector for polytopes

Reported by: gh-kliem Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: sage-9.4
Component: geometry Keywords: parallel f-vector
Cc: jipilab, gh-LaisRast, stumpc5, tscrim Merged in:
Authors: Jonathan Kliem Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator_reb (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) Commit: ae482a4d07ebc5f68fe78b37a32919c85b94aef5
Dependencies: #31474, #31499 Stopgaps:

Status badges

Description (last modified by gh-kliem)

This ticket parallelizes the f-vector for polytopes.

Each thread has its private structure with which it does partial jobs. Depending on the parallelization depth, there is one job per face of fixed codimension (usually 1,2 or 3). After everything has finished, the partial f-vectors will be added.

Actually, every face is visited and thus the code could be modified in the future, to explore other properties of faces then just the dimension. The parallelization seems to work well with at least 40 threads (for computations taking long enough such that this pays off, see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.01945.pdf).

Also the algorithm does work in other situations (simplicial complex, lattice of flats of a matroid) and this parallel structure could be used for this as well.

On the downside, sig_on()/sig_off() doesn't work with with multiple threads and has to be replaced by a simple sig_check(). Also raising errors in parallel code results in terrible slow down. Hence the errors are replaced by returning the exception value. In case of a bug there won't be any traceback anymore, but at least also no segmenation fault.

Before:

sage: P = P.base_extend(QQ)                                                                                                                                   
sage: P = P.base_extend(QQ)                                                                                                                                   
sage: Q = P.join(P.polar(in_affine_span=True))                                                                                                                
sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(Q)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector()                                                                                                                                      
CPU times: user 111 ms, sys: 186 µs, total: 111 ms
Wall time: 111 ms
(1, 150, 3990, 25590, 69450, 95402, 69450, 25590, 3990, 150, 1)

sage: P = polytopes.Birkhoff_polytope(5)                                                                                                                      
sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector()                                                                                                                                      
CPU times: user 584 ms, sys: 25 µs, total: 584 ms
Wall time: 583 ms
(1, 120, 5040, 50250, 233400, 631700, 1113700, 1367040, 1220550, 817150, 419225, 167200, 52120, 12600, 2300, 300, 25, 1)

# Using the <simple> version of the algorithm.
sage: P = polytopes.associahedron(['A', 11], backend='normaliz')                                                                                              
sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector()                                                                                                                                      
CPU times: user 37.9 s, sys: 17.2 ms, total: 37.9 s
Wall time: 37.9 s
(1, 208012, 1144066, 2735810, 3730650, 3197700, 1790712, 659736, 157080, 23100, 1925, 77, 1)

After (machine has 4 cores):

sage: P = polytopes.permutahedron(5)                                                                                                                          
sage: P = P.base_extend(QQ)                                                                                                                                   
sage: Q = P.join(P.polar(in_affine_span=True))                                                                                                                
sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(Q)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=1)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 107 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 107 ms
Wall time: 107 ms
(1, 150, 3990, 25590, 69450, 95402, 69450, 25590, 3990, 150, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(Q)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=2)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 108 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 108 ms
Wall time: 55.6 ms
(1, 150, 3990, 25590, 69450, 95402, 69450, 25590, 3990, 150, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(Q)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=4)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 147 ms, sys: 52 µs, total: 147 ms
Wall time: 38.6 ms
(1, 150, 3990, 25590, 69450, 95402, 69450, 25590, 3990, 150, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(Q)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=8)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 236 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 236 ms
Wall time: 31.2 ms
(1, 150, 3990, 25590, 69450, 95402, 69450, 25590, 3990, 150, 1)

sage: P = polytopes.Birkhoff_polytope(5)                                                                                                                      
sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=1)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 354 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 354 ms
Wall time: 354 ms
(1, 120, 5040, 50250, 233400, 631700, 1113700, 1367040, 1220550, 817150, 419225, 167200, 52120, 12600, 2300, 300, 25, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=2)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 363 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 363 ms
Wall time: 181 ms
(1, 120, 5040, 50250, 233400, 631700, 1113700, 1367040, 1220550, 817150, 419225, 167200, 52120, 12600, 2300, 300, 25, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=4)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 459 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 459 ms
Wall time: 117 ms
(1, 120, 5040, 50250, 233400, 631700, 1113700, 1367040, 1220550, 817150, 419225, 167200, 52120, 12600, 2300, 300, 25, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=8)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 776 ms, sys: 154 µs, total: 776 ms
Wall time: 103 ms
(1, 120, 5040, 50250, 233400, 631700, 1113700, 1367040, 1220550, 817150, 419225, 167200, 52120, 12600, 2300, 300, 25, 1)


# Using the <simple> version of the algorithm.
sage: P = polytopes.associahedron(['A', 11], backend='normaliz')                                                                                              
sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=1)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 33.5 s, sys: 0 ns, total: 33.5 s
Wall time: 33.5 s
(1, 208012, 1144066, 2735810, 3730650, 3197700, 1790712, 659736, 157080, 23100, 1925, 77, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=2)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 34.4 s, sys: 3.49 ms, total: 34.4 s
Wall time: 17.2 s
(1, 208012, 1144066, 2735810, 3730650, 3197700, 1790712, 659736, 157080, 23100, 1925, 77, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=4)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 35.9 s, sys: 15.5 ms, total: 35.9 s
Wall time: 9 s
(1, 208012, 1144066, 2735810, 3730650, 3197700, 1790712, 659736, 157080, 23100, 1925, 77, 1)

sage: C = CombinatorialPolyhedron(P)                                                                                                                          
sage: %time C.f_vector(num_threads=8)                                                                                                                         
CPU times: user 1min 6s, sys: 31.3 ms, total: 1min 6s
Wall time: 8.44 s
(1, 208012, 1144066, 2735810, 3730650, 3197700, 1790712, 659736, 157080, 23100, 1925, 77, 1)

Change History (31)

comment:1 Changed 3 months ago by gh-kliem

  • Status changed from new to needs_review

comment:2 Changed 3 months ago by gh-kliem

  • Description modified (diff)

comment:3 follow-up: Changed 3 months ago by tscrim

  • Reviewers set to Travis Scrimshaw

The sig_check() outside the loop is unnecessary:

     cdef size_t j
+    sig_check()
     for j in range(n_faces):
+        sig_check()
         if (is_not_maximal_fused(new_faces, j, algorithm) or  # Step 2
                 is_contained_in_one_fused(new_faces.faces[j], visited_all, algorithm)):  # Step 3
             is_not_new_face[j] = True

Likewise here:

         face_list_t visited_all) nogil except -1:
 
     cdef size_t output
-    sig_on()
+    sig_check()
     if faces.polyhedron_is_simple:
         output = get_next_level_fused(faces, new_faces, visited_all, <simple> 0)
     else:
         output = get_next_level_fused(faces, new_faces, visited_all, <standard> 0)
-    sig_off()
     return output
 
 cdef inline size_t bit_rep_to_coatom_rep(face_t face, face_list_t coatoms, size_t *output):

Here you either need the sig_on/sig_off or some more targeted checking. I don't see the point in performing a single check here.

Otherwise LGTM.

comment:4 Changed 3 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from d051f283c08d117bd51d2167fb3d0ccf641dd620 to 0dae7a061df9a2f05f9ef2d43602cc04fb351fb0

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

0dae7a0remove redundant sig_checks

comment:5 Changed 3 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 0dae7a061df9a2f05f9ef2d43602cc04fb351fb0 to e3bdc617538af4ab8cdcf147fd74f4e62da5ff2a

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

609bd92do not delete all duplicates
5c6cceefix index
e3bdc61pull in 31226 and fix merge conflict

comment:6 Changed 3 months ago by gh-kliem

  • Dependencies set to #31226

comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed 3 months ago by gh-kliem

Replying to tscrim:

The sig_check() outside the loop is unnecessary:

     cdef size_t j
+    sig_check()
     for j in range(n_faces):
+        sig_check()
         if (is_not_maximal_fused(new_faces, j, algorithm) or  # Step 2
                 is_contained_in_one_fused(new_faces.faces[j], visited_all, algorithm)):  # Step 3
             is_not_new_face[j] = True

Likewise here:

         face_list_t visited_all) nogil except -1:
 
     cdef size_t output
-    sig_on()
+    sig_check()
     if faces.polyhedron_is_simple:
         output = get_next_level_fused(faces, new_faces, visited_all, <simple> 0)
     else:
         output = get_next_level_fused(faces, new_faces, visited_all, <standard> 0)
-    sig_off()
     return output
 
 cdef inline size_t bit_rep_to_coatom_rep(face_t face, face_list_t coatoms, size_t *output):

Here you either need the sig_on/sig_off or some more targeted checking. I don't see the point in performing a single check here.

Otherwise LGTM.

I removed the redundant sig_checks.

As mentioned, sig_on, sig_off doesn't work well with parallelization. It crashes hard because sig_on, sig_off doesn't appear in correct order anymore.

Wrapping prange in sig_on/sig_off has a large performance penalty (8.45 s -> 9 s).

Currently there is one sig_check before checking that a face is inclusion maximal. One can add more sig checks, which wouldn't affect performance much for large examples, but for the small examples there is a penalty of about 50 percent.

I think the current solution should be fine: The largest thing I ever computed with this algorithm, which took about a month on 40 cores, had 11,665,781 vertices and 162 facets. In this case between the sig_checks A &~ B == 0 is performed for about 2 billion bits. Currently, without intrinsics, I get:

sage: B = Bitset((randint(0,2**20) for _ in range(2**19)))                                                                                                    
sage: %timeit B.issubset(B)                                                                                                                                   
6.18 µs ± 9.8 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
sage: %timeit B.intersection_update(B)                                                                                                                        
6.02 µs ± 2.72 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)

On this rate performing this for 2 billion bits should take about 12 ms. And even if the example has many more coatoms, in the worst case (completely unrealistic, because the dimension is not 1 and more memory is needed for other dimensions and probably for other threads), there are bitwise operations performed twice for the entire RAM. Say, we have 1 TB RAM, this would then take 96 seconds. Okay, that is long, but in any realistic sceanrio it would only take about a second, even with 1 TB RAM.

To sum up, I think the current amount of sig_checks suffices for the next years until more than 1 TB RAM is common (and even then, it doubt that there is an application for such a large example, as it would take forever to compute).

comment:8 Changed 3 months ago by gh-kliem

  • Branch changed from u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator to u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator_reb
  • Commit changed from e3bdc617538af4ab8cdcf147fd74f4e62da5ff2a to 928ea608dc56698cd8df3d71b8266e75c28670eb

Rebased.

I didn't have this ticket here ready when writing #30445.

Eventually, one could also store edges/ridges or any sort of face in parallel. This would also help with applications for simplicial complexes and lattice of flats of manifolds.

But that should be left for another time.


New commits:

6a2a9b4fix merge conflict with develop in particual #30445
928ea60remove redundant allocation

comment:9 Changed 3 months ago by tscrim

  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

Thank you. This is quite a nice improvement.

comment:10 Changed 3 months ago by gh-kliem

Thank you.

comment:11 Changed 2 months ago by vbraun

On the kucalc buildbot:

[sagelib-9.3.beta6] [1/1] gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wno-unused -O2 -g -march=native -fPIC -I/var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cysignals -I./sage/data_structures -I./sage/cpython -Isage/cpython -Isage/data_structures -I/var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/build/pkgs/sagelib/src -I/var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9 -I/var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/core/include -Ibuild/cythonized -I/var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9 -c build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.o -fno-strict-aliasing -DCYTHON_CLINE_IN_TRACEBACK=1 -fopenmp -std=c99
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] In file included from build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:660:0:
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] /var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cysignals/struct_signals.h:45:1: sorry, unimplemented: ‘_Atomic’ with OpenMP
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]  typedef volatile _Atomic int cy_atomic_int;
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]  ^
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c: In function ‘__pyx_f_4sage_8geometry_10polyhedron_24combinatorial_polyhedron_13face_iterator_prepare_face_iterator_for_partial_job’:
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9035:54: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]    __pyx_t_2 = ((__pyx_v_structure->current_dimension == (__pyx_v_structure->dimension - __pyx_v_parallelization_depth)) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]                                                       ^
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9322:84: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]      __pyx_t_1 = (((__pyx_v_parallel_struct->current_job_id[__pyx_v_current_depth]) == -1L) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]                                                                                     ^
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9673:54: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]    __pyx_t_1 = ((__pyx_v_structure->current_dimension != ((__pyx_v_structure->dimension - __pyx_v_parallelization_depth) - 1)) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]                                                       ^
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c: In function ‘__Pyx_InitGlobals’:
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:23283:1: warning: ‘PyEval_InitThreads’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]  PyEval_InitThreads();
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]  ^
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] In file included from /var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9/Python.h:145:0,
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]                  from build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:52:
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] /var/lib/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9/ceval.h:130:37: note: declared here
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]  Py_DEPRECATED(3.9) PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyEval_InitThreads(void);
[sagelib-9.3.beta6]                                      ^
[sagelib-9.3.beta6] error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1

comment:12 Changed 2 months ago by vbraun

  • Status changed from positive_review to needs_work

comment:13 Changed 2 months ago by gh-kliem

This appears to be an issue with python 3.5 to 3.7 according to https://bugs.python.org/issue25150

From this I get that this can be "fixed" by doing this specific module as a C++ extension (or by requiring system python >= 3.8, but that isn't an option for the moment).

I'll check if I can reproduce this with system python 3.7 (need to rebuild first).

comment:14 Changed 2 months ago by gh-kliem

Actually, that is a problem with cysignals that should be fixed there.

comment:15 Changed 2 months ago by git

  • Commit changed from 928ea608dc56698cd8df3d71b8266e75c28670eb to baf80deaca74b037c11e5eee914009e216f3beed

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

baf80detry disabling CYSIGNALS_C_ATOMIC

comment:17 Changed 2 months ago by gh-kliem

  • Status changed from needs_work to needs_review

comment:18 Changed 2 months ago by tscrim

  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

Back off to the builbots.

comment:19 follow-up: Changed 5 weeks ago by vbraun

Build fails on various buildbots:

[sagelib-9.3.beta7] [1/1] gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wno-unused -O2 -g -march=native -O2 -g -march=native -fPIC -UCYSIGNALS_C_ATOMIC -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cysignals -I./sage/data_structures -I./sage/cpython -Isage/cpython -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/build/pkgs/sagelib/src -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9 -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/core/include -Ibuild/cythonized -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9 -c build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.o -fno-strict-aliasing -DCYTHON_CLINE_IN_TRACEBACK=1 -fopenmp -std=c99
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] In file included from build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:662:0:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] /home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cysignals/struct_signals.h:45:1: sorry, unimplemented: ‘_Atomic’ with OpenMP
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  typedef volatile _Atomic int cy_atomic_int;
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  ^~~~~~~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c: In function ‘__pyx_f_4sage_8geometry_10polyhedron_24combinatorial_polyhedron_13face_iterator_prepare_face_iterator_for_partial_job’:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9037:54: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]    __pyx_t_2 = ((__pyx_v_structure->current_dimension == (__pyx_v_structure->dimension - __pyx_v_parallelization_depth)) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                                       ^~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9324:84: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]      __pyx_t_1 = (((__pyx_v_parallel_struct->current_job_id[__pyx_v_current_depth]) == -1L) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                                                                     ^~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9675:54: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]    __pyx_t_1 = ((__pyx_v_structure->current_dimension != ((__pyx_v_structure->dimension - __pyx_v_parallelization_depth) - 1)) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                                       ^~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c: In function ‘__Pyx_InitGlobals’:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:23285:1: warning: ‘PyEval_InitThreads’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  PyEval_InitThreads();
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] In file included from /home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9/Python.h:145:0,
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                  from build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:54:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] /home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9/ceval.h:130:37: note: declared here
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  Py_DEPRECATED(3.9) PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyEval_InitThreads(void);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] 
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] real	0m3.325s
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] user	0m2.798s
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] sys	0m0.563s
Makefile:2233: recipe for target 'sagelib-no-deps' failed

comment:20 Changed 5 weeks ago by git

  • Commit changed from baf80deaca74b037c11e5eee914009e216f3beed to da65d28f81ddb7a865d0af830d14bb4132c3c1cb
  • Status changed from positive_review to needs_review

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:

da65d28Revert "try disabling CYSIGNALS_C_ATOMIC"

comment:21 Changed 5 weeks ago by gh-kliem

  • Dependencies changed from #31226 to #31226, #31455

comment:22 Changed 5 weeks ago by gh-kliem

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.3 to sage-9.4

I don't think this is going to happen with 9.3 anymore, if this is waiting on a cysignals patch/update.

comment:23 Changed 5 weeks ago by git

  • Commit changed from da65d28f81ddb7a865d0af830d14bb4132c3c1cb to 405ef3e3bb65ac1c610727c590daf75c19048c45

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

405ef3eMerge branch 'u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator_reb' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator_reb2

comment:24 in reply to: ↑ 19 Changed 5 weeks ago by gh-kliem

This bug isn't too hard to reproduce actually:

https://github.com/kliem/sage/runs/2064520070?check_suite_focus=true

Seems to be connected to older GCC.

Replying to vbraun:

Build fails on various buildbots:

[sagelib-9.3.beta7] [1/1] gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wno-unused -O2 -g -march=native -O2 -g -march=native -fPIC -UCYSIGNALS_C_ATOMIC -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cysignals -I./sage/data_structures -I./sage/cpython -Isage/cpython -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/build/pkgs/sagelib/src -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9 -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/core/include -Ibuild/cythonized -I/home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9 -c build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.o -fno-strict-aliasing -DCYTHON_CLINE_IN_TRACEBACK=1 -fopenmp -std=c99
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] In file included from build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:662:0:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] /home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cysignals/struct_signals.h:45:1: sorry, unimplemented: ‘_Atomic’ with OpenMP
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  typedef volatile _Atomic int cy_atomic_int;
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  ^~~~~~~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c: In function ‘__pyx_f_4sage_8geometry_10polyhedron_24combinatorial_polyhedron_13face_iterator_prepare_face_iterator_for_partial_job’:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9037:54: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]    __pyx_t_2 = ((__pyx_v_structure->current_dimension == (__pyx_v_structure->dimension - __pyx_v_parallelization_depth)) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                                       ^~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9324:84: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]      __pyx_t_1 = (((__pyx_v_parallel_struct->current_job_id[__pyx_v_current_depth]) == -1L) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                                                                     ^~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:9675:54: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]    __pyx_t_1 = ((__pyx_v_structure->current_dimension != ((__pyx_v_structure->dimension - __pyx_v_parallelization_depth) - 1)) != 0);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                                       ^~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c: In function ‘__Pyx_InitGlobals’:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:23285:1: warning: ‘PyEval_InitThreads’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  PyEval_InitThreads();
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] In file included from /home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9/Python.h:145:0,
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                  from build/cythonized/sage/geometry/polyhedron/combinatorial_polyhedron/face_iterator.c:54:
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] /home/buildbot/slave/sage_git/build/local/include/python3.9/ceval.h:130:37: note: declared here
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]  Py_DEPRECATED(3.9) PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyEval_InitThreads(void);
[sagelib-9.3.beta7]                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] 
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] real	0m3.325s
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] user	0m2.798s
[sagelib-9.3.beta7] sys	0m0.563s
Makefile:2233: recipe for target 'sagelib-no-deps' failed

comment:25 Changed 5 weeks ago by gh-kliem

  • Dependencies changed from #31226, #31455 to #31474

comment:26 Changed 4 weeks ago by gh-kliem

  • Status changed from needs_review to needs_work

This might need more work, as the flag -fopenmp isn't understood everywhere: https://github.com/kliem/sage/pull/40/checks?check_run_id=2076988665

So we should probably check out at configure time, whether our compiler supports this, similar to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27122.

comment:27 Changed 4 weeks ago by gh-kliem

  • Dependencies changed from #31474 to #31474, #31499

comment:28 Changed 4 weeks ago by git

  • Commit changed from 405ef3e3bb65ac1c610727c590daf75c19048c45 to 27baa071a64d5f93ca49d5ca4c18ae8ca7fa892a

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

55a4634merge with current develop
6edd48bdefine cython aliases OPENMP_CFLAGS and OPENMP_CXXFLAGS
71f8950fixes to get the aliases to work
b76dc3cadd doctest that shows how use cython.parallel.prange
07cb470Merge branch 'u/gh-kliem/check_openmp_at_configuration' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator_reb
27baa07use OPENMP_CFLAGS

comment:29 Changed 4 weeks ago by gh-kliem

  • Status changed from needs_work to needs_review

comment:30 Changed 4 weeks ago by gh-kliem

comment:31 Changed 4 weeks ago by git

  • Commit changed from 27baa071a64d5f93ca49d5ca4c18ae8ca7fa892a to ae482a4d07ebc5f68fe78b37a32919c85b94aef5

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

a9d3dfesplit to account for multiple arguments
ae482a4Merge branch 'u/gh-kliem/check_openmp_at_configuration' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into u/gh-kliem/first_parallel_version_of_face_iterator_reb
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.