Opened 12 months ago
Closed 11 months ago
#31068 closed enhancement (fixed)
some typos in rings/ and schemes/
Reported by:  chapoton  Owned by:  

Priority:  minor  Milestone:  sage9.3 
Component:  documentation  Keywords:  
Cc:  slelievre  Merged in:  
Authors:  Frédéric Chapoton  Reviewers:  Samuel Lelièvre 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  4562ac7 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  4562ac7601a0ff27ad44fc6ae342dbbf01b1f922 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
found using
sage tox e=codespell src/sage/rings/
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 12 months ago by
 Branch set to u/chapoton/31068
 Commit set to 5a940a0b924fef06353aae962427c27cb72413cd
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 12 months ago by
 Commit changed from 5a940a0b924fef06353aae962427c27cb72413cd to 78212340f3c0a4be1ed205f35a9ee39271f8ebb6
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7821234  some details

comment:3 Changed 12 months ago by
Some optional suggestions while we are at it, but they can wait too.
While fixing "ambiguous" spelling, also change capitalisation.
 ValueError: Input is ambiguous: x as well as raw_element=42 are specified. + ValueError: input is ambiguous: x as well as raw_element=42 are specified. ...  raise ValueError('Input is ambiguous: ' + raise ValueError('input is ambiguous: '
While fixing "guarentee" > "guarantee", also fix "there is not" > "there is no" and single or no backticks to double backticks.
  A tuple (a, b, c) which satisfies `a = b*f + c*g`. There  is not guarantee that a, b, and c are minimal. +  A tuple ``(a, b, c)`` which satisfies ``a = b*f + c*g``. There + is no guarantee that ``a``, ``b``, and ``c`` are minimal.
Misspelled "seperate" incorrectly fixed to "saperate", should be "separate".
 We can represent the Berkovich projective line in two saperate ways: + We can represent the Berkovich projective line in two separate ways:
Fix "exceeds" as well as "allotted" (twice).
 However, if the Newton iteration exceedes the allotted attempts, + However, if the Newton iteration exceeds the allotted attempts,
Finally, whenever touching %
or .format(...)
string formatting,
I would go fstrings, but up to you since you're doing the work!
comment:4 Changed 12 months ago by
 Commit changed from 78212340f3c0a4be1ed205f35a9ee39271f8ebb6 to e6fa6e6fde6f0d4c83f4541e45b2a363e8558202
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e6fa6e6  more fixes in rings and schemes

comment:5 Changed 12 months ago by
 Commit changed from e6fa6e6fde6f0d4c83f4541e45b2a363e8558202 to 4562ac7601a0ff27ad44fc6ae342dbbf01b1f922
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
4562ac7  one more pyflakes fix

comment:6 Changed 12 months ago by
 Reviewers set to Samuel Lelièvre
Positive review from me if bots are happy.
comment:7 Changed 11 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
ok, let's say that the bots are green enough
Merci Samuel
comment:8 Changed 11 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/chapoton/31068 to 4562ac7601a0ff27ad44fc6ae342dbbf01b1f922
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
New commits:
bunch of typos in rings/ and schemes/