Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #30278, comment 12


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 3, 2020, 12:33:04 PM (2 years ago)
Author:
Michael Jung
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #30278, comment 12

    initial v1  
    66However, due to my [https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30095#comment:7 comment:7] in #30095, the aforementioned map is not necessarily an isomorphism if the field characteristic is not zero. Usually it is given, but we also allow other fields/rings as base. Hence, I tend to agree with you, Matthias.
    77
    8 Anyway, it would be good to keep the from Eric metioned behavior `a+T` in case of characteristic zero. Is there a compromise, we can go?
     8Anyway, it would be good to keep the from Eric mentioned behavior `a+T` in case of characteristic zero. Is there a compromise, we can go?
    99
    1010By the way: not having a doctest doesn't mean that it is not used in practice, I'd say. Imho, the documention is in general very sparse, even though the manifolds extension has a comparatively comprehensive documentation.