Changes between Version 2 and Version 20 of Ticket #30015


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/17/20 08:09:36 (15 months ago)
Author:
jipilab
Comment:

Replying to gh-kliem:

  • The biggest trouble with schlegel is that the default position now seems to be much too close !(?)

Take a look at at

polytopes.six_hundred_cell().plot() etc.

The default position that works good for stacking, seems to be too close for schlegel projection.

Defaulting behavior will never be perfect.

  • Even worse: polytopes.permutahedron(4).show() isn't orthonormally projected anymore.

It was a mere coincidence that it was orthonormally projected by the method show (!). This indicates that if one has a lower dimensional object (<=3) in an ambient dimension which is strictly larger than 3, one would prefer to visualize (by default) the object in its affine hull, and that, orthonormally projected. This is what you mean?

In this case, this is a different ticket fixing the .show()/.plot() methods. This ticket fixes the schlegel projection which it does...

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #30015

    • Property Milestone changed from sage-9.2 to sage-9.3
    • Property Commit changed from bed13a6539a1750c63250faee16342bf33bed8a1 to c3df1d5855585ee893a86fbcd85d341fe4d2d58d
  • Ticket #30015 – Description

    v2 v20  
    3030
    3131This ticket fixes the projection while de-duplicating some code.
     32
     33FOLLOW-UP: Fix .plot() and .show() to have a better behaviour of smaller dimensional objects.