Opened 2 years ago

Last modified 3 months ago

#29849 needs_work defect

MR44: Reduce space required to build docker images

Reported by: galois Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: sage-9.7
Component: docker Keywords:
Cc: saraedum, mkoeppe Merged in:
Authors: Julian Rüth Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: u/galois/mrs/44/docker-shrink (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) Commit: 08375f8576ed9cda53f4ee1177016204a543fcec
Dependencies: Stopgaps:

Status badges

Change History (14)

comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by saraedum

  • Component changed from PLEASE CHANGE to docker
  • Description modified (diff)
  • Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
  • Type changed from PLEASE CHANGE to defect

comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by saraedum

comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by galois

  • Commit changed from 866a161fec6f6c39a1e49a78863bce777c430d10 to c9a36d74cf08db019087c165b6890bbd100f2235

New commits added to merge request. I updated the commit SHA-1. New commits:

c9a36d7Explain what the space constraints on the host system are

comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by galois

  • Commit changed from c9a36d74cf08db019087c165b6890bbd100f2235 to 08375f8576ed9cda53f4ee1177016204a543fcec

New commits added to merge request. I updated the commit SHA-1. New commits:

08375f8add debug df output

comment:5 Changed 22 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.2 to sage-9.3

comment:6 Changed 18 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.3 to sage-9.4

Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date.

comment:7 Changed 17 months ago by slelievre

Is this solved by #31502?

comment:8 Changed 17 months ago by mkoeppe

No, the user-facing docker image building scripts have nothing to do with GH Actions.

comment:9 Changed 13 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.4 to sage-9.5

Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review.

comment:10 Changed 12 months ago by chapoton

  • Cc saraedum added

@saraedum : can we close that one ?

By the way, our docker process needs care..

comment:11 Changed 11 months ago by dimpase

  • Cc mkoeppe added

Can we move building Sage's docker image(s) to GitHub Actions?

comment:12 Changed 11 months ago by mkoeppe

Yes, I think there's no technical obstacle to that. The 6 hour time limit should be plenty - it is enough for most of our CI tests that also build from scratch. You could consider to follow #29536

comment:13 Changed 7 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.5 to sage-9.6

comment:14 Changed 3 months ago by mkoeppe

  • Milestone changed from sage-9.6 to sage-9.7
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.