#29188 closed enhancement (fixed)
Move vertex facet graph to combinatorial polyhedron
Reported by:  ghkliem  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage9.1 
Component:  geometry  Keywords:  polyhedra, vertex facet graph, combinatorial polyhedron 
Cc:  jipilab, ghLaisRast  Merged in:  
Authors:  Jonathan Kliem  Reviewers:  JeanPhilippe Labbé 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  a36a211 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  a36a21179ccb0e23792f312d75283db5697f2aed 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
We move the method vertex_facet_graph
from Polyhedron_base
to CombinatorialPolyhedron
.
Along the way we fix an bug, namely that vertex_facet_graph(labels=False)
has the edges the wrong way::
sage: P = polytopes.cube() sage: P.vertex_facet_graph().is_isomorphic(P.vertex_facet_graph(False)) False sage: P.vertex_facet_graph().is_isomorphic(P.vertex_facet_graph(False).reverse()) True
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 14 months ago by
 Branch set to public/29188
 Commit set to 6dbf267cb51e5cc05354ce330427aedcdb43eb30
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 followup: ↓ 5 Changed 14 months ago by
 Reviewers set to JeanPhilippe Labbé
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
There is a space missing in the inputs.
Then, I would just swap the two examples to show the default behavior first.
Could you make this sentence more clear:
If ``names`` is ``True`` but no names are provided,
I would suggest to put If names is True (the default) but no names...
.
comment:3 Changed 14 months ago by
 Branch changed from public/29188 to public/29188reb
 Commit changed from 6dbf267cb51e5cc05354ce330427aedcdb43eb30 to 7bae9dc943a7bd12f7e6a03993ea5d319345db2a
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:4 Changed 14 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7bae9dc943a7bd12f7e6a03993ea5d319345db2a to d4679c7c6ae42d3aa7e133f029622434bec511fb
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
d4679c7  removed unused import

comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 14 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
I'll just put it back to needs work until this is done.
Replying to jipilab:
There is a space missing in the inputs.
Then, I would just swap the two examples to show the default behavior first.
Could you make this sentence more clear:
If ``names`` is ``True`` but no names are provided,I would suggest to put
If names is True (the default) but no names...
.
comment:6 Changed 14 months ago by
 Commit changed from d4679c7c6ae42d3aa7e133f029622434bec511fb to a36a21179ccb0e23792f312d75283db5697f2aed
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a36a211  swapped examples

comment:7 Changed 14 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:8 Changed 12 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage9.1 to sage9.2
Batch modifying tickets that will likely not be ready for 9.1, based on a review of the ticket title, branch/review status, and last modification date.
comment:10 Changed 12 months ago by
 Branch changed from public/29188reb to a36a21179ccb0e23792f312d75283db5697f2aed
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:11 Changed 11 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage9.2 to sage9.1
New commits:
add vertex_facet_graph to combinatorial polyhedron
use combinatorial polyhedron to obtain the vertex facet graph