Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #29152, comment 47


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 3, 2020, 7:36:35 PM (2 years ago)
Author:
Matthias Köppe
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #29152, comment 47

    initial v1  
    1010> Actually it is not clear to me what is stated there. Do I understand correctly that tests on different versions of Cygwin pass, except "cygwin-stage-ii-a (standard)"? And the failed package in this Cygwin version is scipy?
    1111
    12 The build on Cygwin takes very long because various overheads compared to a build on Linux. On GH Actions there is a time limit of 6 hours per job. Therefore I have split the build into several jobs ("stages"), some of which run in parallel. The linked build https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/actions/runs/285244461 is the `cygwin-standard` build, which means that I install binary packages from the Cygwin distribution first and then start the build of Sage.
     12The build on Cygwin takes very long because of various overheads compared to a build on Linux. On GH Actions there is a time limit of 6 hours per job. Therefore I have split the build into several jobs ("stages"), some of which run in parallel. The linked build https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/actions/runs/285244461 is the `cygwin-standard` build, which means that I install binary packages from the Cygwin distribution first and then start the build of Sage.
    1313
    1414`stage-i-a` and `stage-i-b` ran in parallel and succeeded. What they install in `SAGE_LOCAL` is carried forward to `stage-ii`. The 5 jobs `stage-ii-a` to `stage-ii-e` all ran in parallel, building various packages.