Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 5 months ago
#28803 new defect
normaliz, e-antic do not build shared libraries on Cygwin
Reported by: | embray | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-pending |
Component: | porting: Cygwin | Keywords: | e_antic normaliz cygwin |
Cc: | vdelecroix | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
This appears to be at least part of the problem with building pynormaliz as reported in #28703.
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by
Cc: | videlec added |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by
Cc: | vdelecroix added; videlec removed |
---|
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 3 years ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.0 → sage-9.1 |
---|
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed
comment:6 Changed 3 years ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.1 → sage-9.2 |
---|
comment:7 Changed 3 years ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.2 → sage-9.1 |
---|---|
Summary: | e-antic does not build shared libraries on Cygwin → normaliz, e-antic do not build shared libraries on Cygwin |
This can also be seen at https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/641394520
comment:8 Changed 3 years ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.1 → sage-9.2 |
---|
comment:9 Changed 2 years ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.2 → sage-9.3 |
---|
comment:10 Changed 23 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.3 → sage-9.4 |
---|
Sage development has entered the release candidate phase for 9.3. Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date.
comment:11 Changed 19 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.4 → sage-9.5 |
---|
comment:12 Changed 14 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.5 → sage-9.6 |
---|
comment:13 Changed 11 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.6 → sage-9.7 |
---|
comment:14 Changed 5 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.7 → sage-pending |
---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Unsurprisingly, this appears to be a likely case of #13354.