Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #28422, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
09/01/19 15:51:04 (2 years ago)
Author:
egourgoulhon
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #28422, comment 6

    initial v1  
    55Taking into account the above, a possible use of a `verbose` option would the following: if `check=True`, then
    66- for `verbose=True`, print the check details (as they are now)
    7 - for `verbose=False`, print nothing if the check is fully passed (i.e. if the variable `any_failure` defined in the code remains to `True`) and print the check details (as they are now) when some failure has occurred
     7- for `verbose=False`, print nothing if the check is fully passed (i.e. if the variable `any_failure` defined in the code remains to `False`) and print the check details (as they are now) when some failure has occurred
    88
    99Would you agree with such a behavior?