Opened 3 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#28045 closed enhancement (fixed)
spkg-configure.m4 for libatomic
Reported by: | dimpase | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-9.1 |
Component: | build: configure | Keywords: | spkg-configure |
Cc: | embray, mjo | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Michael Orlitzky | Reviewers: | Isuru Fernando |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | e86ec71 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) | Commit: | e86ec713a996be9f58eb81d32c21293ac37e1b7b |
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
this might need a tricky (?) check that the configuration is as needed for ecl.
otherwise, libatomic has no deps, and gc only depends on libatomic
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-8.9 to sage-9.1
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
- Branch set to u/mjo/ticket/28045
- Cc mjo added
- Commit set to e86ec713a996be9f58eb81d32c21293ac37e1b7b
Should we do these separately? If gc winds up being tricky, we can do the dead-simple libatomic in the meantime.
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
- Status changed from new to needs_review
- Summary changed from spkg-configure.m4 for gc and libatomic to spkg-configure.m4 for libatomic
Let's do libatomic here, and gc in #28991. I'd like to get the easy ones out of the way and then we can spent as much time as it takes to do the tricky ones.
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Isuru Fernando
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Works for me. gc
finds it. checking which libatomic_ops to use... external
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by
add missing Author full name, please
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by
comment:7 Changed 2 years ago by
- Branch changed from u/mjo/ticket/28045 to e86ec713a996be9f58eb81d32c21293ac37e1b7b
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed