Opened 8 months ago
Closed 8 months ago
#27585 closed enhancement (fixed)
py3: fixes in matrices
Reported by: | jhpalmieri | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-8.8 |
Component: | python3 | Keywords: | |
Cc: | jdemeyer, chapoton, tscrim | Merged in: | |
Authors: | John Palmieri | Reviewers: | Vincent Klein |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | 888612c (Commits) | Commit: | 888612cf517cdb99c075ba3bdde0dfbfbff75942 |
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
This fixes a few doctests for sage.matrices:
- there is some randomness in the ordering in one small part of one verbose test in
compute_J_ideal.py
, so replace it with...
- up to now,
mat[range(3), range(4)]
did not work, so I've tried to modify__getitem__
and__setitem__
to allowrange
types as inputs - some doctests use random matrices to test other features. The randomness differs on Python 2 vs. Python 3, so get rid of the randomness. The tests still test the relevant methods (which are determinants, for example, not the randomness).
- there is minor numerical noise in one doctest.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 8 months ago by
- Branch set to u/jhpalmieri/matrix-py3
comment:2 Changed 8 months ago by
- Cc jdemeyer chapoton tscrim added
- Commit set to 888612cf517cdb99c075ba3bdde0dfbfbff75942
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:3 Changed 8 months ago by
After this ticket, there is one remaining doctest failure in sage.matrix
:
TypeError: type sage.rings.real_double.RealDoubleElement doesn't define __round__ method
in matrix_double_dense.pyx
.
comment:4 Changed 8 months ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
patchbot errors are unrelated with this ticket.
Looks good to me.
comment:5 Changed 8 months ago by
- Reviewers set to Vincent Klein
comment:6 Changed 8 months ago by
- Branch changed from u/jhpalmieri/matrix-py3 to 888612cf517cdb99c075ba3bdde0dfbfbff75942
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Regarding the random matrix issue: I think what's going on is that the different versions of Python are using different orderings on monomials in
QQ.<x,y>
, for instance, so after coming up with a list of random coefficients, the resulting polynomials are different. (With Python 2, you would seea*y^2 + b*x*y
while in Python 3 you would seea*x*y + b*y^2
, same coefficientsa
andb
in the two cases.)Regarding the changes to allow
range(...)
as valid input to__getitem__
and__setitem__
for matrices: are these changes okay? Is there a better way to do it?New commits:
trac 27585: work on Python 3 compatibility for sage.matrix