Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#26765 closed enhancement (fixed)
py3: fix last 2 doctests in coding
Reported by: | chapoton | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-8.5 |
Component: | python3 | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Frédéric Chapoton | Reviewers: | Vincent Klein |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | f34ad1c (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) | Commit: | f34ad1caf5ad9c84e395212328ccd03134a02a6c |
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
Change History (11)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
- Branch set to u/chapoton/26765
- Commit set to f34ad1caf5ad9c84e395212328ccd03134a02a6c
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by
I think we should try to fix the root problem. Which seems to come from class Function_log2
from file sage.functions.log
.
Note that there is other doctests falling because of this bug :
sage -t --long src/sage/functions/log.py ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/functions/log.py", line 404, in sage.functions.log.log Failed example: log(int(8),2) Expected: 3 Got: 1 ...
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by
this is fixed in the next pynac, not yet released. Look for tickets about pynac..
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
Ok, but what should we do for the other cases then? (If we don't wait for pynac next release).
For File "src/sage/functions/log.py", line 404
case for example i see 3 possibilities :
- Removing the doctest
- Tag the doctest with # py2
- Modify
log
function and convert the faulting parameter if we are inPY3
and if it's anint
. If we do it this way it will also solve the error fixed by this ticket.
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
Or we can do a sage patch for pynac with https://github.com/pynac/pynac/pull/336
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by
My proposal for the patch #26770.
comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by
I agree that we need to fix the problem in general.
But could we please still validate the branch here ? This would finish the "coding" module.
comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by
I want to wait for Ralph Stephan answer about pynac release. At least today.
I think it would be better to avoid to convert into a Sage integer to get around the log
bug if possible.
If we validate the branch right now and if #26770 is accepted or if a new pynac version is released in the next few days that means we should revert + return int(ZZ(codesize_upper_bound(n, d, q, algorithm=algorithm)).log(q))
to avoid unnecessary convertion.
comment:10 Changed 4 years ago by
- Reviewers set to Vincent Klein
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Ok, let's finish the coding module.
comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by
- Branch changed from u/chapoton/26765 to f34ad1caf5ad9c84e395212328ccd03134a02a6c
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
New commits:
py3: fix last doctests in coding