Opened 4 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#25944 new defect
Evaluating polynomial().list() on zero element is inconsistent among different precision types
Reported by: | varul | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | sage-8.4 |
Component: | padics | Keywords: | padicIMA, padicBordeaux |
Cc: | roed, caruso | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
I would expect the result of the following six commands to be the same.
sage: ZqFM(4,names='a')(0).polynomial().list() [] sage: ZqCA(4,names='a')(0).polynomial().list() [] sage: ZqFP(4,names='a')(0).polynomial().list() [] sage: QqFP(4,names='a')(0).polynomial().list() [] sage: ZqCR(4,names='a')(0).polynomial().list() [0] sage: QqCR(4,names='a')(0).polynomial().list() [0]
However, they are not. The ones where the precision model is capped-relative gives [0] instead of the expected [].
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
- Summary changed from Evaluating polynomial().list() on 0 element is inconsistent among different precision types to Evaluating polynomial().list() on zero element is inconsistent among different precision types
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by
- Keywords padicBordeaux added
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.