Opened 4 years ago
Last modified 3 months ago
#25644 new enhancement
Symbolic quo //, rem %, and quo_rem()
Reported by: | Ralf Stephan | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-9.8 |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Dave Morris, Matthias Köppe, Travis Scrimshaw, Eric Gourgoulhon, Michael Jung | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | #24838 | Stopgaps: |
Description
Pynac-0.7.22 provides them, the ticket will add the interface.
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
Dependencies: | → #24838 |
---|
comment:2 Changed 17 months ago by
Cc: | Dave Morris added |
---|---|
Milestone: | sage-8.3 → sage-9.4 |
comment:3 Changed 17 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.4 → sage-9.5 |
---|
comment:4 Changed 17 months ago by
Cc: | Matthias Köppe Travis Scrimshaw Eric Gourgoulhon Michael Jung added |
---|
comment:5 Changed 17 months ago by
comment:6 Changed 12 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.5 → sage-9.6 |
---|
comment:7 Changed 8 months ago by
I have no clue about pynac. It would be nice to have this future in Sage, especially in view of #31894. Can anyone help?
comment:8 Changed 8 months ago by
I believe the pynac quo_rem
method requires both arguments to be univariate polynomials, not general expressions. (A search of the pynac source code shows that its only use is in the method that calculates the partial fraction decomposition of a rational function of a single variable.) A quo_rem
method is already available for polynomial rings (even multivariate ones), so would this pynac function actually be useful for anything? Or were you looking for something else?
comment:9 Changed 8 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.6 → sage-9.7 |
---|
comment:10 Changed 3 months ago by
Milestone: | sage-9.7 → sage-9.8 |
---|
Can I help? Unfortunately, I don't know much about Pynac and it's interface in Sage.