#25602 closed defect (fixed)
implement translation of fricas.rootOf
Reported by:  mantepse  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage8.4 
Component:  interfaces: optional  Keywords:  FriCAS 
Cc:  ghnasser1, rws, arojas  Merged in:  
Authors:  Martin Rubey  Reviewers:  Dima Pasechnik, Eric Gourgoulhon 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  4539a94 (Commits)  Commit:  
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
sage: var('x') sage: fricas.setSimplifyDenomsFlag(fricas.true) sage: integrate(sqrt(x + sqrt(x + 1))/((x^2 + 1)*sqrt(x + 1)),x,algorithm="fricas") sage: integrate(sqrt(x + sqrt(x + 1))/(x^2 + 1),x, algorithm="fricas")
yield NotImplementedError
s, because FriCAS returns results containing rootOf
expressions.
See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fricasdevel/aV7uLH8plZM
Change History (43)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by
 Type changed from PLEASE CHANGE to defect
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
 Keywords FriCAS added
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc ghnasser1 added
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by
I searched my tests files, and do not see a "simple" result. Each of these integrals below generate rootOf when running them in Fricas. But they all produce large results I am afraid. But these should be useful to test your conversion with.
integrate(1/(1/x^(1/3)+x^(1/2)),x) integrate(x^(1/2)/(1/x^(1/3)+x^(1/2)),x) integrate((x+(1+x)^(1/2))^(1/2)/(x^2+1)/(1+x)^(1/2),x) integrate((x+(1+x)^(1/2))^(1/2)/(x^2+1),x) integrate(1/(a^5+x^5),x) integrate(x^2/(a^5+x^5),x) integrate(x^3/(a^5+x^5),x) integrate(1/x^2/(a^5+x^5),x) integrate(1/x^3/(a^5+x^5),x) integrate(1/x^4/(a^5+x^5),x) integrate(x^6/(2*x^5+3)^3,x) integrate(tan(x)/(1+tan(x)^(1/2))^2,x)
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by
This was very helpful! I've now got something if no variables are involved, however, I am not sure how helpful it is. For example:
sage: f = 1/(1+x^5) sage: F = fricas.integrate(f, x).sage(); F (0.06180339887498948? + 0.1902113032590308?*I)*log(2*x + 0.618033988749895? + 1.902113032590308?*I) + (0.06180339887498948?  0.1902113032590308?*I)*log(2*x + 0.618033988749895?  1.902113032590308?*I) + 1/5*log(x + 1)  (0.1618033988749895?  0.11755705045849462?*I)*log(x  0.8090169943749474? + 0.5877852522924731?*I)  (0.1618033988749895? + 0.11755705045849462?*I)*log(x  0.8090169943749474?  0.5877852522924731?*I)
(I checked the solution, it is correct.)
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by
Just found out that QQbar
can try to find an expression in terms of radicals. The output will be terrible, in general:
sage: F = fricas.integrate(f, x).sage(); F 1/20*(sqrt(5) + 2*sqrt(3/16*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2  1/8*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  3)*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)  3/16*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2 + 1/2*sqrt(5) + 5*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  5/2)  1)*log(2*x + 1/2*sqrt(5) + sqrt(3/16*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2  1/8*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  3)*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)  3/16*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2 + 1/2*sqrt(5) + 5*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  5/2)  1/2) + 1/20*(sqrt(5)  2*sqrt(3/16*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2  1/8*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  3)*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)  3/16*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2 + 1/2*sqrt(5) + 5*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  5/2)  1)*log(2*x + 1/2*sqrt(5)  sqrt(3/16*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2  1/8*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  3)*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)  3/16*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)^2 + 1/2*sqrt(5) + 5*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  5/2)  1/2)  1/20*(sqrt(5)  10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)*log(x  1/4*sqrt(5) + 5/2*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  1/4)  1/20*(sqrt(5) + 10*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10) + 1)*log(x  1/4*sqrt(5)  5/2*sqrt(1/50*sqrt(5)  1/10)  1/4) + 1/5*log(x + 1) sage: F.simplify_full() 1/20*(sqrt(2)*sqrt(sqrt(5)  5)  sqrt(5)  1)*log(1/8*sqrt(2)*(4*sqrt(2)*x  sqrt(5)*sqrt(2)  sqrt(2) + 2*sqrt(sqrt(5)  5)))  1/20*(sqrt(2)*sqrt(sqrt(5)  5) + sqrt(5) + 1)*log(1/8*sqrt(2)*(4*sqrt(2)*x  sqrt(5)*sqrt(2)  sqrt(2)  2*sqrt(sqrt(5)  5))) + 1/20*(sqrt(5) + 2*sqrt(1/2*sqrt(5)  5/2)  1)*log(2*x + 1/2*sqrt(5) + sqrt(1/2*sqrt(5)  5/2)  1/2) + 1/20*(sqrt(5)  2*sqrt(1/2*sqrt(5)  5/2)  1)*log(2*x + 1/2*sqrt(5)  sqrt(1/2*sqrt(5)  5/2)  1/2) + 1/5*log(x + 1)
comment:7 followup: ↓ 9 Changed 2 years ago by
I do not think you'd want to actually evaluate numerically the roots as in your first example above.
I think fricas uses rootOf when it can't solve for the root analytically (as in polynomials for higher order than 4, where there is no formula in general).
I've seen Mathematica also return RootOf? for some results. The user can then obtain numerical values for the result if they want to afterwords. But for a symbolic integration, the result should always be returned as symbolic, with no floating point numbers. So your second example above would be much better to use.
btw, For this example, Mathematica gives
Integrate[1/(1+x^5),x] (1/20)*(2*Sqrt[10  2*Sqrt[5]]*ArcTan[(1 + Sqrt[5]  4*x)/Sqrt[10  2*Sqrt[5]]] + 2*Sqrt[2*(5 + Sqrt[5])]*ArcTan[(1 + Sqrt[5] + 4*x)/Sqrt[2*(5 + Sqrt[5])]] + 4*Log[1 + x] + (1 + Sqrt[5])*Log[1 + (1/2)*(1 + Sqrt[5])*x + x^2]  (1 + Sqrt[5])*Log[1  (1/2)*(1 + Sqrt[5])*x + x^2])
Thank you Nasser
comment:8 Changed 2 years ago by
 Branch set to u/mantepse/implement_translation_of_fricas_rootof
comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit set to 84c392e413ef4515ab4e4d3e5e17d6e54c930ef2
Replying to ghnasser1:
I do not think you'd want to actually evaluate numerically the roots as in your first example above.
Note that the result is not numeric, the coefficients are in QQbar
. They are exact, only an approximation is printed.
Anyway, I don't know whether sage has a "symbolic" rootOf
equivalent. On the positive side, it is then possible to evaluate integration results numerically.
To deal with integration results containing additional variables, a little more work is needed.
New commits:
84c392e  first version of translation of rootOf

comment:10 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 84c392e413ef4515ab4e4d3e5e17d6e54c930ef2 to a983d7a55150a8fd566dbb7f4097e001721500d5
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a983d7a  translate rootOf also when extra variables are present

comment:11 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:12 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc rws added
comment:13 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from a983d7a55150a8fd566dbb7f4097e001721500d5 to becb3681d2f24a47e68902a69c712b172bb96294
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
becb368  fix doctests

comment:14 Changed 2 years ago by
@ghnasser1: dear Nasser, could you please check whether this works for you now? (it was actually a fair bit of work, so I'd rather get back to it now than later)
Please test especially integrals with parameters (that is, extra variables) showing up in the rootOf
expressions.
comment:15 followup: ↓ 16 Changed 2 years ago by
ping?
comment:16 in reply to: ↑ 15 ; followup: ↓ 17 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to mantepse:
ping?
Hi, sorry, I am not familar with github and did not know I need to do anything. I did not see this.
What exactly you want me to do when you say to see if it works?
How do I test your changes? Do I need to reinstall sagemath from Manjaro AUR again? It is still at 8.3 beta 6 last I checked Which is the one I am using now. Or is there a newer version to use?
I am complete newbie in github and of this. Only way I know, is to use Manjaro GUI package manager to install sagemath.
comment:17 in reply to: ↑ 16 Changed 2 years ago by
Hi Nasser!
To get these changes into sage (eg., 8.3. beta 8), someone has to "review" them, that is, make sure that they are correct. You can contribute to a review by stating here that you tried the modified code and that it works for you, for example, trying it on further integrals.
To be able to try the code, you have to install sage using git, because, of course, the changes are not yet in sage.
If you only want to review (as opposed to submitting code yourself), you have to do the things from http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/walk_through.html in sections
 Configuring Git
 Obtaining the Sage Source Code
and then (from http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/git_trac.html)
 Installing the GitTrac Command
 Git and Trac Configuration
 Reviewing
If that works for you, that would be great!
comment:18 Changed 2 years ago by
Hello;
I am sorry, this is all over my head. I do not know what sage trac and how to install git and do not know how to build sage myself from sources and any of this. Never used these before.
I installed sage by clicking on a button using Linux package manager. It did everything.
I am not really in a position or have knowledge now to go through such steps you described above.
When I find a new bug using sage, I'll report it here and leave Experts like yourself to handle the rest.
I'll be happy to install a new version of sagemath when new one is released and run the tests. I check the Linux package manager to find out.
Thank you
comment:19 Changed 2 years ago by
No problem, Nasser!
comment:20 Changed 2 years ago by
Hello; fyi, I tried these in new installed sagemath 8.3 beta 7, Release Date: 20180623, using AUR package manager of Linux Manjaro.
They still generate " not yet implemented" for rootOf.
I will check again when a new version of sagemath is released.
Thank you
comment:21 followup: ↓ 22 Changed 2 years ago by
Hello; fyi, I tried these in new build and installed sagemath 8.3 beta 8,
>sage ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ SageMath version 8.3.beta8, Release Date: 20180630 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browserbased notebook interface. │ │ Type "help()" for help. │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Using AUR package manager of Linux Manjaro.
They still generate "not yet implemented" for rootOf.
I will check again when a new version of sagemath is released.
Thank you
comment:22 in reply to: ↑ 21 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghnasser1:
They still generate "not yet implemented" for rootOf.
Nasser, this ticket is "needs review", maybe you can review? See http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html#sagetracandtickets
You can always try out the code here by building Sage from source, see http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html
Working with binary only will never get you the newest code, be it Sage or other programs. Moreover, open source means there are opportunites to help, to give back. Try it.
comment:23 Changed 23 months ago by
ping?
comment:24 Changed 23 months ago by
Hello,
If the ping is meant for me, please note, as I mentioned above, I can only try with current version of sagemath, which I update each time a new one comes out using Arch Linux package manager on Linux Manjaro.
I do not know how to build sagemath from GIT sources or use git.
For SageMath version 8.3.rc2, Release Date: 20180722 the NotImplementedError
error is still there for rootOf
Thanks Nasser
comment:25 Changed 22 months ago by
LGTM.
It would be nice however if you could correct the pyflake errors reported in this patchbot log.
comment:26 Changed 22 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage8.3 to sage8.4
comment:27 Changed 22 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/mantepse/implement_translation_of_fricas_rootof to public/fricas/rootof
 Commit changed from becb3681d2f24a47e68902a69c712b172bb96294 to 4539a940848397eb8113f0e889db231e0dac91dc
 Reviewers set to Dima Pasechnik
comment:28 Changed 22 months ago by
if this works for you, please set it to positive review
comment:29 Changed 22 months ago by
Great! Yes, I rebuilt and all test still pass. (My intention was to fix the pyflakes stuff in a separate ticket, but I am very happy if they are already fixed now.)
Not sure whether "you" is me or Eric, so I am not taking action...
comment:30 Changed 22 months ago by
 Reviewers changed from Dima Pasechnik to Dima Pasechnik, Eric Gourgoulhon
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Thanks to both of you!
comment:31 Changed 22 months ago by
 Branch changed from public/fricas/rootof to 4539a940848397eb8113f0e889db231e0dac91dc
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:32 Changed 22 months ago by
 Commit 4539a940848397eb8113f0e889db231e0dac91dc deleted
fyi, I just tried this again in version 8.4.beta1, Release Date: 20180814 to see if the RootOf? translation is fixed in this version or not to rerun my tests.
But now I get a new error for the same command posted in the original ticket above. Instead of getting NotImplementedError? Sagemath now gives
RuntimeError: ECL says: Filesystem error with pathname #P"/usr/lib/ecl/maxima.fas". Either 1) the file does not exist, or 2) we are not allowed to access the file, or 3) the pathname points to a broken symbolic link.
Here is the full command
sage: var('x') x sage: fricas.setSimplifyDenomsFlag(fricas.true) false sage: integrate(sqrt(x + sqrt(x + 1))/(x^2 + 1),x, algorithm="fricas")  RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput50a653d27d8c0> in <module>() > 1 integrate(sqrt(x + sqrt(x + Integer(1)))/(x**Integer(2) + Integer(1)),x, algorithm="fricas") /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/misc/functional.py in integral(x, *args, **kwds) 751 """ 752 if hasattr(x, 'integral'): > 753 return x.integral(*args, **kwds) 754 else: 755 from sage.symbolic.ring import SR /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.integral (build/cythonized/sage/symbolic/expression.cpp:69786)() 12371 R = ring.SR 12372 return R(integral(f, v, a, b, **kwds)) > 12373 return integral(self, *args, **kwds) 12374 12375 integrate = integral /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/integration/integral.py in integrate(expression, v, a, b, algorithm, hold) 814 if not integrator: 815 raise ValueError("Unknown algorithm: %s" % algorithm) > 816 return integrator(expression, v, a, b) 817 if a is None: 818 return indefinite_integral(expression, v, hold=hold) /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/integration/external.py in fricas_integrator(expression, v, a, b, noPole) 189 " in the integration interval") 190 > 191 return result.sage() 192 193 /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/interface.py in sage(self, *args, **kwds) 1049 [0 0] 1050 """ > 1051 return self._sage_(*args, **kwds) 1052 1053 def __repr__(self): /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/fricas.py in _sage_(self) 1496 # we treat Expression Integer and Expression Complex 1497 # Integer just the same > 1498 return self._sage_expression(unparsed_InputForm) 1499 1500 if head == 'DistributedMultivariatePolynomial': /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/fricas.py in _sage_expression(self, unparsed_InputForm) 1241 poly = R(poly.subs({var:R.gen()})) 1242 # we just need any root per FriCAS specification > 1243 rootOf_ev[var] = poly.roots(multiplicities=False)[0].radical_expression() 1244 del rootOf[var] 1245 i = 0 /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/rings/qqbar.py in radical_expression(self) 3939 else: 3940 interval_field = ComplexIntervalField(self._value.prec()) > 3941 roots = poly.roots(SR, multiplicities=False) 3942 if len(roots) != poly.degree(): 3943 return self /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx in sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial.roots (build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:69120)() 7731 var = SR(vname) 7732 expr = self(var) > 7733 rts = expr.solve(var, 7734 explicit_solutions=True, 7735 multiplicities=multiplicities) /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression.solve (build/cythonized/sage/symbolic/expression.cpp:64716)() 11548 """ 11549 from sage.symbolic.relation import solve > 11550 return solve(self, x, multiplicities=multiplicities, 11551 solution_dict=solution_dict, 11552 explicit_solutions=explicit_solutions, /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/relation.py in solve(f, *args, **kwds) 1043 1044 if is_Expression(f): # f is a single expression > 1045 return _solve_expression(f, x, explicit_solutions, multiplicities, to_poly_solve, solution_dict, algorithm, domain) 1046 1047 if not isinstance(f, (list, tuple)): /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/relation.py in _solve_expression(f, x, explicit_solutions, multiplicities, to_poly_solve, solution_dict, algorithm, domain) 1281 1282 # from here on, maxima is used for solution > 1283 m = ex._maxima_() 1284 P = m.parent() 1285 if explicit_solutions: /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression._maxima_ (build/cythonized/sage/symbolic/expression.cpp:8054)() 815 # Maybe not such a great idea because the "default" interface is another one 816 from sage.calculus.calculus import maxima > 817 return super(Expression, self)._interface_(maxima) 818 else: 819 return super(Expression, self)._interface_(session) /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx in sage.structure.sage_object.SageObject._interface_ (build/cythonized/sage/structure/sage_object.c:5636)() 732 except (KeyError, ValueError): 733 pass > 734 nm = I.name() 735 init_func = getattr(self, '_%s_init_' % nm, None) 736 if init_func is not None: /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/misc/lazy_import.pyx in sage.misc.lazy_import.LazyImport.__getattr__ (build/cythonized/sage/misc/lazy_import.c:3609)() 320 True 321 """ > 322 return getattr(self.get_object(), attr) 323 324 # We need to wrap all the slot methods, as they are not forwarded /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/misc/lazy_import.pyx in sage.misc.lazy_import.LazyImport.get_object (build/cythonized/sage/misc/lazy_import.c:2270)() 187 if likely(self._object is not None): 188 return self._object > 189 return self._get_object() 190 191 cpdef _get_object(self): /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/misc/lazy_import.pyx in sage.misc.lazy_import.LazyImport._get_object (build/cythonized/sage/misc/lazy_import.c:2535)() 219 elif self._at_startup and not startup_guard: 220 print('Option ``at_startup=True`` for lazy import {0} not needed anymore'.format(self._name)) > 221 self._object = getattr(__import__(self._module, {}, {}, [self._name]), self._name) 222 name = self._as_name 223 if self._deprecation is not None: /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/maxima_lib.py in <module>() 103 ## i.e. loading it into ECL 104 ecl_eval("(setf *loadverbose* NIL)") > 105 ecl_eval("(require 'maxima \"{}\")".format(MAXIMA_FAS)) 106 ecl_eval("(inpackage :maxima)") 107 ecl_eval("(setq $nolabels t))") /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/libs/ecl.pyx in sage.libs.ecl.ecl_eval (build/cythonized/sage/libs/ecl.c:11019)() 1324 1325 #convenience routine to more easily evaluate strings > 1326 cpdef EclObject ecl_eval(str s): 1327 """ 1328 Read and evaluate string in Lisp and return the result /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/libs/ecl.pyx in sage.libs.ecl.ecl_eval (build/cythonized/sage/libs/ecl.c:10958)() 1339 cdef cl_object o 1340 o=ecl_safe_read_string(str_to_bytes(s)) > 1341 o=ecl_safe_eval(o) 1342 return ecl_wrap(o) 1343 /usr/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/libs/ecl.pyx in sage.libs.ecl.ecl_safe_eval (build/cythonized/sage/libs/ecl.c:5930)() 348 if ecl_nvalues > 1: 349 s = si_coerce_to_base_string(ecl_values(1)) > 350 raise RuntimeError("ECL says: {}".format( 351 char_to_str(ecl_base_string_pointer_safe(s)))) 352 else: RuntimeError: ECL says: Filesystem error with pathname #P"/usr/lib/ecl/maxima.fas". Either 1) the file does not exist, or 2) we are not allowed to access the file, or 3) the pathname points to a broken symbolic link. sage: quit Exiting Sage (CPU time 0m2.69s, Wall time 7m5.92s). Exiting FriCAS with PID 23312 running /usr/bin/fricas nosman
I have fricas Version: FriCAS 1.3.4 installed and working fine.
I installed sagemath now using the system package manager on Linux Manjaro 18.0 Beta 5.
Is the RootOf? was supposed to be fixed in Sagemath 8.4 beta 1? If not, that is OK. But why different error now shows in the above call than before?
comment:33 Changed 22 months ago by
I cannot reproduce this, but it looks like being a problem with maxima...
comment:34 Changed 22 months ago by
I forgot to add maxima info on my Linux: (I am not sure why Maxima is used in the call, when the algorithm is fricas, but this might be because sagemath is using maxima for other things during the call to fricas)
>uname a Linux mepc 4.14.601MANJARO #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 3 12:49:45 UTC 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux >which maxima /bin/maxima >maxima version ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/sbbsdsockets.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/sockets.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/defsystem.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/cmp.fas" Maxima 5.41.0 >
Btw, this error
RuntimeError: ECL says: Filesystem error with pathname #P"/usr/lib/ecl/maxima.fas".
shows up only when calling fricas from sagemath with that specific integral which used to generate the RootOf? not implemented errror.
If I use another integral, this error do not show up with fricas:
sage: var('x') x sage: integrate(sin(x),x,algorithm="fricas") cos(x) sage:
No error. May be Maxima on my box has problem, I do not know.
comment:35 followup: ↓ 36 Changed 22 months ago by
Fricas and Maxima have in Sage ECL, as a common dependency. It seems that here for some reason ECLs used for them are different, but this doesn't quite work.
comment:36 in reply to: ↑ 35 ; followup: ↓ 37 Changed 22 months ago by
Replying to dimpase:
Fricas and Maxima have in Sage ECL, as a common dependency. It seems that here for some reason ECLs used for them are different, but this doesn't quite work.
How could this be? Both Fricas and Maxima are built using the same ECL during the build of sage, aren't they?
@nasser: FriCAS' rootOf
operator takes a polynomial and means "take any root of this polynomial". Since sage doesn't have an equivalent operator, the code explicitely looks for a root of the given polynomial. This happens to involve maxima...
comment:37 in reply to: ↑ 36 Changed 22 months ago by
Replying to mantepse:
Replying to dimpase:
Fricas and Maxima have in Sage ECL, as a common dependency. It seems that here for some reason ECLs used for them are different, but this doesn't quite work.
How could this be? Both Fricas and Maxima are built using the same ECL during the build of sage, aren't they?
nasser is testing whatever comes from Arch linux packaging of Sage betas. It could be it's broken ATM.
@nasser: what is the output of sage maxima
? Does it start the system's maxima, as
you reported in comment 34?
comment:38 Changed 22 months ago by
Here is the output:
>sage ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ SageMath version 8.4.beta1, Release Date: 20180814 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browserbased notebook interface. │ │ Type "help()" for help. │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ ┃ Warning: this is a prerelease version, and it may be unstable. ┃ ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛ sage: exit Exiting Sage (CPU time 0m0.08s, Wall time 0m2.89s). >sage maxima ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/sbbsdsockets.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/sockets.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/defsystem.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/cmp.fas" Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net using Lisp ECL 16.1.2 Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. (%i1)
WHich seem to match that when calling maxima directly
> >maxima ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/sbbsdsockets.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/sockets.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/defsystem.fas" ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl16.1.2/cmp.fas" Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net using Lisp ECL 16.1.2 Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. (%i1)
I installed sagemath using Arch linux package manager. I think the source comes from this page
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sagemathgit/
For reference, I also asked about this here a while ago
Nasser
comment:39 Changed 22 months ago by
To find the implementation used with FriCAS, I think (but I'm not sure) you could do:
sage: fricas.eval(")lisp (lispimplementationversion)") sage: fricas.eval(")lisp (lispimplementationtype)")
comment:40 Changed 22 months ago by
I installed Fricas also from Arch linux repo, as I mention above, it is version Version: FriCAS 1.3.4.
I run your commands and this is what sage says:
sage: fricas.eval(")lisp (lispimplementationversion)") '\nValue = "1.4.8"' sage: fricas.eval(")lisp (lispimplementationtype)") '\nValue = "SBCL"' sage:
May be some could install Manjaro on a Vbox and then installed sagemath from Arch Linux and try to see if they reproduce this new error "RuntimeError?: ECL says: Filesystem error with pathname #P"/usr/lib/ecl/maxima.fas"
It is very easy to install fricas and sagemath using Arch linux. I use the GUI package manager, and add AUR repo to the selection, then search for sagemath and fricas, and select install.
It downloads and compiles everything from git sources and builds everything itself. It takes only 1 hr or so.
Note as I mentioned above, I am using Manjaro 18.0 beta 5 on a VBOx. ISO can be downloaded from Linux Manjaro web site.
comment:41 followup: ↓ 43 Changed 22 months ago by
 Cc arojas added
I'm cc'ng Arch maintainer  is there something fishy with fricas support withe current Arch package?
comment:42 Changed 22 months ago by
If you install fricas separately, sagemath will use the global version  which should be good, because sbcl is much faster than ecl.
However, this shouldn't interfere at all with maxima.
One way to debug this is to try to solve the polynomial equation explicitely with maxima. But that's not so easy, because it contains many rootOf
operators...
Nasser, do you happen to have a simple integration result containing a
rootOf
? This would be really helpful for testing purposes!