Opened 4 years ago
Last modified 3 months ago
#25558 new enhancement
Move multivariate polynomials to new coercion model
Reported by:  jdemeyer  Owned by:  

Priority:  critical  Milestone:  sage9.7 
Component:  coercion  Keywords:  
Cc:  andrew.mathas, tscrim, ghmwageringel  Merged in:  
Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer  Reviewers:  
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  u/jdemeyer/ticket/25558 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  160624fc77a13d4a528a7e7eeaa73fc10b562d54 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
Change History (25)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #25555
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch set to u/jdemeyer/ticket/25558
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit set to d6b2d6acb97133cabf6a5c4b1f06705ef65f0edf
 Dependencies changed from #25555 to #25555, #25563
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit changed from d6b2d6acb97133cabf6a5c4b1f06705ef65f0edf to 2717d6ef96411c9d9600725e781b40a969b9e848
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
 Cc Andrew Mathas added
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
 Cc andrew.mathas added; Andrew Mathas removed
comment:7 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit changed from 2717d6ef96411c9d9600725e781b40a969b9e848 to 160624fc77a13d4a528a7e7eeaa73fc10b562d54
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
160624f  Move multivariate polynomials to new coercion model

comment:8 Changed 3 years ago by
 Dependencies #25555, #25563 deleted
comment:9 Changed 3 years ago by
 Cc tscrim added
comment:10 Changed 3 years ago by
In #26741 Jeroen mentioned that he might be too busy to work on this full time.
If the stars align properly I will try to be at "Calcul Mathématique Libre" and I would be happy to work on this there but, as I said, I might need some guidance to do so. Would any of the attendees be willing/able to provide it?
comment:11 Changed 3 years ago by
I will not be there, but I can try to be available remotely to work on it.
comment:12 Changed 3 years ago by
Thanks Travis, I hope I'll be able to be there.
comment:13 Changed 3 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #27034
 Milestone changed from sage8.3 to sage8.7
Said conference is this week but given that neither of you are here there is no real point in doing it right now.
comment:14 Changed 3 years ago by
comment:15 Changed 3 years ago by
Sorry for flying off the radars for a while but I had an unexpected change of job. The dust is still settling but I should be able to resume working on this whenever you want to.
comment:16 Changed 3 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage8.7 to sage8.8
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed (if you don't believe this ticket is appropriate for the Sage 8.8 release please retarget manually)
comment:17 Changed 3 years ago by
Are there any more concrete plans working on this ticket?
comment:18 Changed 3 years ago by
 Milestone sage8.8 deleted
As the Sage8.8 release milestone is pending, we should delete the sage8.8 milestone for tickets that are not actively being worked on or that still require significant work to move forward. If you feel that this ticket should be included in the next Sage release at the soonest please set its milestone to the next release milestone (sage8.9).
comment:19 Changed 21 months ago by
 Milestone set to sage9.3
comment:20 Changed 16 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage9.3 to sage9.4
Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date.
comment:21 Changed 14 months ago by
 Cc ghmwageringel added
 Priority changed from major to critical
comment:22 Changed 12 months ago by
 Dependencies #27034 deleted
comment:23 Changed 10 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage9.4 to sage9.5
comment:24 Changed 6 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage9.5 to sage9.6
comment:25 Changed 3 months ago by
 Milestone changed from sage9.6 to sage9.7
New commits:
Replace _coerce_ checks by has_coerce_map_from
Move multivariate polynomials to new coercion model