Opened 4 years ago
Closed 9 months ago
#25304 closed defect (invalid)
SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes fails on Debian 9 32-bit
Reported by: | vbraun | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | packages: standard | Keywords: | sdl |
Cc: | dimpase | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Dima Pasechnik | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
This is why we don't have a Debian 9 32-bit binary.
Looks like Singular links to the OS-provided libgcc:
[dochtml] Setting permissions of DOT_SAGE directory so only you can read and write it. [dochtml] Traceback (most recent call last): [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 163, in _run_module_as_main [dochtml] mod_name, _Error) [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 111, in _get_module_details [dochtml] __import__(mod_name) # Do not catch exceptions initializing package [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage_setup/docbuild/__init__.py", line 24, in <module> [dochtml] import sage.all [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/all.py", line 94, in <module> [dochtml] from sage.rings.all import * [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/all.py", line 88, in <module> [dochtml] from .qqbar import (AlgebraicRealField, AA, [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 2116, in <module> [dochtml] QQxy = QQ['x', 'y'] [dochtml] File "sage/structure/parent.pyx", line 1239, in sage.structure.parent.Parent.__getitem__ (build/cythonized/sage/structure/parent.c:11801) [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/categories/rings.py", line 1087, in __getitem__ [dochtml] return PolynomialRing(self, elts) [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py", line 648, in PolynomialRing [dochtml] return _multi_variate(base_ring, names, **kwds) [dochtml] File "/home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py", line 776, in _multi_variate [dochtml] from sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_libsingular import MPolynomialRing_libsingular [dochtml] ImportError: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_7.0.0' not found (required by /home/buildbot/slave/binary_pkg/build/source/SageMath/jc4b6yulaujayb9sr94ia88eourzeqip0oidmas391yaj2/local/lib/libSingular-4.1.0.so)
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-8.3 to sage-8.4
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by
- Keywords sdl added
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by
Is this still a problem with current Sage?
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by
Is this the same as #25996?
comment:6 Changed 9 months ago by
- Cc dimpase added
- Milestone changed from sage-8.4 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
Outdated: It now fails in a different way (when tested with tox -e docker-debian-stretch-i386-minimal-gcc_spkg
gives "Error building gcc-10.3.0").
Let's close this ticket.
comment:7 Changed 9 months ago by
- Reviewers set to Dima Pasechnik
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:8 Changed 9 months ago by
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
update milestone 8.3 -> 8.4