#24905 closed enhancement (fixed)
Upgrade polymake to version 3.4
Reported by:  mkoeppe  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage8.8 
Component:  packages: optional  Keywords:  IMAPolyGeom, thursdaysbdx 
Cc:  SimonKing, jipilab, vdelecroix, slelievre, ghsophiasage, paffenholz@…, kastner@…  Merged in:  
Authors:  Matthias Koeppe, JeanPhilippe Labbé, Dima Pasechnik  Reviewers:  Matthias Koeppe, JeanPhilippe Labbé, Dima Pasechnik 
Report Upstream:  Reported upstream. No feedback yet.  Work issues:  
Branch:  public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  2eda6e11325d5d997f0de64e9d9f7add42fa7adb 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description (last modified by )
https://polymake.org/doku.php/download/start#get_latest_stable_release33
To build it for Sage do:
(cd upstream && wget https://polymake.org/lib/exe/fetch.php/download/polymake3.4minimal.tar.bz2)
pull this ticket and build sage
make build
Then Read (and follow) the installation instructions regarding Perl prereqs on your platform:
./sage info polymake
Finally:
./sage i polymake
Attachments (3)
Change History (173)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by
 Dependencies set to #24921
 Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by
 Branch set to u/mkoeppe/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit set to ca75153778edc640a002a3a0a731c8ca17526cc9
comment:4 Changed 3 years ago by
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:5 Changed 3 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
ninja_build
should be an orderonly dependency (after the 
symbol)
comment:6 Changed 3 years ago by
All other packages have $(MP_LIBRARY)
in their dependencies instead of $(INST)/$(SAGE_MP_LIBRARY)
. I guess this should be changed.
comment:7 followup: ↓ 8 Changed 3 years ago by
Unfortunately, I cannot test this because perl_term_readline_gnu
fails to install:
[perl_term_readline_gnu1.34] Could not find neither libtermcap.a, libncurses.a, or libcurses.
Indeed, there is no libncurses.a
installed (but libncurses.so
is).
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 ; followup: ↓ 13 Changed 3 years ago by
Replying to jdemeyer:
Unfortunately, I cannot test this because
perl_term_readline_gnu
fails to install:[perl_term_readline_gnu1.34] Could not find neither libtermcap.a, libncurses.a, or libcurses.Indeed, there is no
libncurses.a
installed (butlibncurses.so
is).
Could you create a separate ticket for this (and include more log detail)?
comment:9 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit changed from ca75153778edc640a002a3a0a731c8ca17526cc9 to 196eb49ec31e9523f7e2f2c91a8b2b430e58d2e5
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
4fc26ff  ninja_build: Add python dependency

3d6ae67  ninja_build: Make Python an orderonly dependency

acc3026  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/mkoeppe/add_optional_package__ninja_build___build_system_for_polymake_' into t/24905/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2

196eb49  polymake dependencies: Use current format for MP_LIBRARY, make ninja_build orderonly

comment:10 Changed 3 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:11 Changed 3 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
 Work issues set to Failures in test suite
comment:12 Changed 3 years ago by
This upgrade seems to break the whole polymake interface. Next step: Compare what's happening on the wire (pexpect log) between the two polymake versions.
comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 8 Changed 3 years ago by
Replying to mkoeppe:
Replying to jdemeyer:
Unfortunately, I cannot test this because
perl_term_readline_gnu
fails to install:[perl_term_readline_gnu1.34] Could not find neither libtermcap.a, libncurses.a, or libcurses.Indeed, there is no
libncurses.a
installed (butlibncurses.so
is).Could you create a separate ticket for this (and include more log detail)?
We have reproduced this problem on another linux box. Fix is in #25112.
comment:14 Changed 3 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #24921 to #24921, #25112
comment:15 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit changed from 196eb49ec31e9523f7e2f2c91a8b2b430e58d2e5 to 0b818c3b6b156230ae5495fb78c4bda83b887ba3
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
3ffafdf  Update perl_term_readline_gnu to 1.35

672a3a2  perl_term_readline_gnu: Find ncurses

0b818c3  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/mkoeppe/perl_term_readline_gnu__upgrade_to_1_35_and_patch_away_ncurses_problem' into t/24905/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2

comment:16 Changed 3 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:17 Changed 3 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:18 Changed 3 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:19 Changed 3 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:20 Changed 3 years ago by
Compilation fails on Debian stretch. I copy the relevant section of the log file:
[706/940] LD /home/jplabbe/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.2r2/src/build/Opt/lib/polytope.so FAILED: /home/jplabbe/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.2r2/src/build/Opt/lib/polytope.so g++ shared L/usr/local/lib fstackprotectorstrong Wl,z,lazy Wl,asneeded o LOOOOOOOOGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG LIST OF .o and .so files /home/jplabbe/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.2r2/src/build/Opt/staticlib/sympol/libsympol.a L/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib Wl,rpath,/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib lsoplex lz lppl llrsgmp lnormaliz lgmpxx lcddgmp L/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib Wl,rpath,/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib fopenmp lmpfr lgmp lpthread ldl /usr/bin/ld: /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/libsoplex.a(rational.cpp.o): relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against symbol `_ZN6soplex8Rational10useListMemE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with fPIC /usr/bin/ld: /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/libsoplex.a(spxdefines.cpp.o): relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against symbol `_ZN6soplex5Param9s_epsilonE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
comment:21 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit changed from 0b818c3b6b156230ae5495fb78c4bda83b887ba3 to 24aec38a58374bd38f6fd5ff72cdf63df7e0f162
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
24aec38  polymake: disable SoPlex to avoid linking errors

comment:22 followup: ↓ 24 Changed 3 years ago by
Now the compilation finishes without errors. Testing with optional=polymake
, I get:
 sage t backend_polymake.py # 53 doctests failed sage t base.py # 13 doctests failed 
The first is:
sage: p = Polyhedron(vertices=[(0,0),(1,0),(0,1)], rays=[(1,1)],lines=[], backend='polymake')
for which I get:
Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: Can't locate File/Slurp.pm in @INC (you may need to install the File::Slurp module) (@INC contains: CODE(0x562008f51e88) /home/jplabbe/sage/local/share/polymake/perllib /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/polymake/perlx/5.24.1/x86_64linuxgnuthreadmulti /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/polymake/perlx/5.24.1 /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/polymake/perlx /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/perl5/x86_64linuxgnuthreadmulti /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/perl5 /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64linuxgnu/perl/5.24.1 /usr/local/share/perl/5.24.1 /usr/lib/x86_64linuxgnu/perl5/5.24 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64linuxgnu/perl/5.24 /usr/share/perl/5.24 /usr/local/lib/site_perl /usr/lib/x86_64linuxgnu/perlbase) BEGIN failedcompilation aborted
Another type of error seems to be that not putting ()
at the end of a CAPITALIZEDPOLYMAKEMETHOD returns a function and not the result anymore.
comment:23 Changed 3 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from #24921, #25112 to #24921, #25112, #24152
For the error with Slurp, merge #24152 (needs review) and then reread the polymake SPKG.txt regarding the Perl libraries that need to be installed.
comment:24 in reply to: ↑ 22 ; followup: ↓ 25 Changed 3 years ago by
Replying to jipilab:
Another type of error seems to be that not putting
()
at the end of a CAPITALIZEDPOLYMAKEMETHOD returns a function and not the result anymore.
Yes, that's exactly what I meant when I wrote "break[s] the whole polymake interface".
comment:25 in reply to: ↑ 24 Changed 3 years ago by
Replying to mkoeppe:
Replying to jipilab:
Another type of error seems to be that not putting
()
at the end of a CAPITALIZEDPOLYMAKEMETHOD returns a function and not the result anymore.Yes, that's exactly what I meant when I wrote "break[s] the whole polymake interface".
I wanted to emphaSIZE the problem! ;)
comment:26 Changed 3 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/mkoeppe/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2 to public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2
 Commit changed from 24aec38a58374bd38f6fd5ff72cdf63df7e0f162 to 2748391a3d6d13fd2a8399eb5e70c303e960b7a4
comment:27 Changed 3 years ago by
 Keywords IMAPolyGeom added
comment:28 Changed 3 years ago by
3.2r3 is out
comment:29 Changed 3 years ago by
Ok, good to know. At the beginning of October, I have a week where I'll try this once more.
Further, I had a comment recently that one might want to add a link to the backend polymake
in the documentation page for the interface (because the interface is not the only way to use polymake in sage...).
comment:30 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit changed from 2748391a3d6d13fd2a8399eb5e70c303e960b7a4 to 791f7661e6fa7285aa6e11f4f2ae2e36a80a50bc
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
791f766  Merge branch 'develop' into public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2

comment:31 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 791f7661e6fa7285aa6e11f4f2ae2e36a80a50bc to f4dee94eecaad786c8a65e9243487b0d6ffe4eb4
comment:32 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Summary changed from Upgrade polymake to version 3.2r2 to Upgrade polymake to version 3.2r4
It seems that the commit 791f766 merged the develop branch into the upgrade polymake branch?
We then get all the diffs from the develop branch on this ticket... I would revert back to a previous commit if no changes were done at the same time as this merge... Let's see how it goes with this update on top of the last beta.
Now version 3.2.r4 is out as well and I updated the description of the ticket.
Polymake days are January 2426 2019, I will ask them if a stable release is to be expected soon...
comment:33 Changed 2 years ago by
I accidently erased the patch to compile with gcc7 form a previous ticket... I do not have gcc7 on my computer... But I guess it would be good to check it again anyways on this new release...
comment:34 followup: ↓ 37 Changed 2 years ago by
I am looking at the broken polymake interface. I noticed a few things:
 Quotes do not work the same way as before:
sage: polymake("'ok'") # optional  polymake 'ok'
So we need to handle this differently when calling member functions.
 I get a compilation error directly while asking for the Type of a polytope:
polytope > $c = cube(3); polytope > $t = typeof $c; polymake: ERROR: Compilation error
This breaks pretty much everything, as the object is not able to catch its type and get the proper names for functions, and lots of other things...
comment:35 Changed 2 years ago by
 Branch changed from public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r2 to public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4
 Commit changed from f4dee94eecaad786c8a65e9243487b0d6ffe4eb4 to 40c60988f83e2763562395bbe6ec5cd2a9709b25
comment:36 Changed 2 years ago by
The previous commits fix the polymake interface, see https://forum.polymake.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1675 for a discussion of the issue.
In short, the command
$t = typeof $c;
Stopped working (as in the tutorials mentionned in the discussion) and we should use:
$t = $c > type;
This seems to have fixed the problems.
There is still a spurious failing test in the interface which is an appearing blankline. I ignore it for now...
Next, I'll check the polymake backend for polyhedron. There seems to be around 4 failing doctests. That's much better than the 100s... there was.
comment:37 in reply to: ↑ 34 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to jipilab:
I am looking at the broken polymake interface. I noticed a few things:
 Quotes do not work the same way as before:
sage: polymake("'ok'") # optional  polymake 'ok'
This was simply because of the failing evaluation when setting variables. It seems fine now.
comment:38 followup: ↓ 39 Changed 2 years ago by
On the release page of polymake 3.2 https://polymake.org/doku.php/news/release_3_2
one can read under "polytope":
 zero vectors in input properties throw an exception
This breaks a few of our tests.
comment:39 in reply to: ↑ 38 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to jipilab:
On the release page of polymake 3.2 https://polymake.org/doku.php/news/release_3_2
one can read under "polytope":
 zero vectors in input properties throw an exception
This breaks a few of our tests.
The question is now: how to get the full space as a polyhedron is polymake?
comment:40 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 40c60988f83e2763562395bbe6ec5cd2a9709b25 to a5bf869d82c6a47ce243d4f205674a4f40c8d5ae
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a5bf869  Fixed backend polymake

comment:41 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
 Work issues Failures in test suite deleted
It seems that the tests now pass.
Ready for review!
comment:42 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc slelievre added
 Milestone changed from sage8.2 to sage8.7
comment:43 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from a5bf869d82c6a47ce243d4f205674a4f40c8d5ae to 7a5de5a2fd2a4a8cdcd864040574f22fd44ae537
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7a5de5a  Merge branch 'public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into polymake32r4

comment:44 followup: ↓ 46 Changed 2 years ago by
I'm getting the following error:
Running doctests with ID 201903111411330ac43552. Git branch: public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4 Using optional=4ti2,bliss,cmake,dochtml,gmpy2,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,polymake,pynormaliz,python2,qhull,sage,topcom Doctesting 1 file. sage t long warnlong 41.5 src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1735, in sage.interfaces.polymake.PolymakeElement.get_member_function Failed example: c.get_member_function("foo")() # optional  polymake Expected: Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: Can't locate object method "foo" via package "Polymake::polytope::Polytope__Rational" at input line 1. Got: <BLANKLINE> Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.PolymakeElement.get_member_function[6]>", line 1, in <module> c.get_member_function("foo")() # optional  polymake File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 2114, in __call__ return self._obj._check_valid().function_call(self._name, list(args), kwds) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 284, in function_call return self(s) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/interface.py", line 288, in __call__ return cls(self, x, name=name) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 1442, in __init__ raise_(TypeError, TypeError(*x.args), sys.exc_info()[2]) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 1437, in __init__ self._name = parent._create(value, name=name) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 628, in _create self.set(name, value) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 717, in set self.eval(cmd) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 1351, in eval for L in code.split('\n') if L != '']) File "/srv/public/kliem/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1068, in _eval_line raise PolymakeError(e) TypeError: Can't locate object method "foo" via package "Polymake::polytope::Polytope__Rational"
Also, I had to install perl yet with
cpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurp
yet. With polymake 3.1 in sage, there was not need of that.
comment:45 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 7a5de5a2fd2a4a8cdcd864040574f22fd44ae537 to 7ca4434de75f0594173f8e39cf25574bf049796d
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7ca4434  Fixed a failing doctest

comment:46 in reply to: ↑ 44 ; followup: ↓ 47 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
The failing doctest should be fixed now.
Also, I had to install perl yet with
cpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurpyet. With polymake 3.1 in sage, there was not need of that.
Could you be more specific about this? Could you say in which order you did this and if we have to add this to the installation instruction?
comment:47 in reply to: ↑ 46 ; followup: ↓ 50 Changed 2 years ago by
I had polymake installed via ./sage i polymake
before.
This didn't require any extra installations.
I went through the instructions of this ticket and ignored
./sage info polymake
.
This failed. Following the instructions and executing
cpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurp
beforehand worked fine.
To me it looks like ./sage i polymake
worked somehow out of the box before and now it doesn't anymore.
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to ghkliem:
The failing doctest should be fixed now.
Also, I had to install perl yet with
cpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurpyet. With polymake 3.1 in sage, there was not need of that.
Could you be more specific about this? Could you say in which order you did this and if we have to add this to the installation instruction?
comment:48 followup: ↓ 51 Changed 2 years ago by
Btw, also polymake is not autodetected when running doctests.
So ./sage t all long
will not use polymake unless specified.
I don't know, if this is a problem specific to my installation or not.
comment:49 followup: ↓ 52 Changed 2 years ago by
Almost everything passed now. This is the only thing remaining on my machine:
File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 823, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: p.N_LATTICE_POINTS # optional  polymake Expected: used package latte LattE (Lattice point Enumeration) is a computer software dedicated to the problems of counting lattice points and integration inside convex polytopes. Copyright by Matthias Koeppe, Jesus A. De Loera and others. http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~latte/ 27 Got: 27
comment:50 in reply to: ↑ 47 ; followup: ↓ 53 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
I had polymake installed via
./sage i polymake
before. This didn't require any extra installations.I went through the instructions of this ticket and ignored
./sage info polymake
. This failed. Following the instructions and executingcpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurpbeforehand worked fine.
To me it looks like
./sage i polymake
worked somehow out of the box before and now it doesn't anymore.
Have a look at the commit to see what changed. When we update a package, we change the source and the place to download the package. Since the package is not yet on the sage mirror, this is why you download it and put it in the appropriate folder by hand.
After doing so, as long as you are on this branch, installing polymake will install the newest version (the one written with this new ticket). If you go back to a different ticket, you have to (re)install polymake the usual way. And it should work. But well, polymake installation used to not work before, so there's no discussion to have on this aspect. We should focus on the present installation.
Again, can you state clearly what you did stepbystep and say if each step worked or not. It is difficult to follow from what you write about what worked and what did not work.
comment:51 in reply to: ↑ 48 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
Btw, also polymake is not autodetected when running doctests.
So
./sage t all long
will not use polymake unless specified.I don't know, if this is a problem specific to my installation or not.
Polymake is an experimental package, so it is not included in the default testing. Perhaps there is a way to include all experimental package. But this is a recipe for disaster anyway. So just add it by hand each time you test. That's the cheapest solution.
comment:52 in reply to: ↑ 49 ; followup: ↓ 55 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
Almost everything passed now. This is the only thing remaining on my machine:
File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 823, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: p.N_LATTICE_POINTS # optional  polymake Expected: used package latte LattE (Lattice point Enumeration) is a computer software dedicated to the problems of counting lattice points and integration inside convex polytopes. Copyright by Matthias Koeppe, Jesus A. De Loera and others. http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~latte/ 27 Got: 27
Okay, this is annoying, as I do not get this error in my case. It seems that they randomly throw out such transparency statements about libraries it uses. Okay. Thanks for pointing this out.
comment:53 in reply to: ↑ 50 ; followup: ↓ 56 Changed 2 years ago by
Ok, let's try again.
In my current Sage installation I had polymake 3.1 installed. When installing it, this worked out of the box. So a simply run of ./sage i polymake
and I had polymake 3.3. No prereqs.
When testing this ticket, I checked out this branch and pulled and did everything as instructed, but ignored
./sage info polymake
. This did not work (yes I didn't follow the instructions completely).
When I paid attention to ./sage info polymake
and installed the perl thing, it worked fine.
If somehow possible, it would be nice to have ./sage i polymake
work without any prereqs again.
But I have no idea whats going on and whether this depends on my specific computer or not.
I just wanted to point out, that the update to polymake 3.2 has a prequirement that wasn't there before. You are probably aware of this, I just wanted to mention it.
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to ghkliem:
I had polymake installed via
./sage i polymake
before. This didn't require any extra installations.I went through the instructions of this ticket and ignored
./sage info polymake
. This failed. Following the instructions and executingcpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurpbeforehand worked fine.
To me it looks like
./sage i polymake
worked somehow out of the box before and now it doesn't anymore.Have a look at the commit to see what changed. When we update a package, we change the source and the place to download the package. Since the package is not yet on the sage mirror, this is why you download it and put it in the appropriate folder by hand.
After doing so, as long as you are on this branch, installing polymake will install the newest version (the one written with this new ticket). If you go back to a different ticket, you have to (re)install polymake the usual way. And it should work. But well, polymake installation used to not work before, so there's no discussion to have on this aspect. We should focus on the present installation.
Again, can you state clearly what you did stepbystep and say if each step worked or not. It is difficult to follow from what you write about what worked and what did not work.
comment:54 Changed 2 years ago by
On Ubuntu 16.04 with sage 8.7.beta7, after installing the dependencies, the command
sage t optional=sage,optional,experimental,external,polymake src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py
gives:
Using optional=4ti2,bliss,cbc,ccache,cmake,cryptominisat,dot2tex,experimental,external,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,polymake,pycosat,pynormaliz,python2,qhull,rst2ipynb,sage,topcom External software to be detected: cplex,ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,macaulay2,magma,maple,mathematica,matlab,octave,pandoc,scilab Doctesting 1 file. sage t src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py [245 tests, 8.19 s]  All tests passed!  Total time for all tests: 11.7 seconds cpu time: 1.8 seconds cumulative wall time: 8.2 seconds External software detected for doctesting:
comment:55 in reply to: ↑ 52 ; followup: ↓ 57 Changed 2 years ago by
Just to mention this.
I am using cofio: https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/?machine=debian&machine=9.6&machine=x86_64&machine=4.9.08amd64&machine=cofio&status=open
Not with the Sage same install, but I don't think it matters.
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to ghkliem:
Almost everything passed now. This is the only thing remaining on my machine:
File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 823, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: p.N_LATTICE_POINTS # optional  polymake Expected: used package latte LattE (Lattice point Enumeration) is a computer software dedicated to the problems of counting lattice points and integration inside convex polytopes. Copyright by Matthias Koeppe, Jesus A. De Loera and others. http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~latte/ 27 Got: 27Okay, this is annoying, as I do not get this error in my case. It seems that they randomly throw out such transparency statements about libraries it uses. Okay. Thanks for pointing this out.
comment:56 in reply to: ↑ 53 ; followup: ↓ 58 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
Ok, let's try again.
In my current Sage installation I had polymake 3.1 installed. When installing it, this worked out of the box. So a simply run of
./sage i polymake
and I had polymake 3.3. No prereqs.When testing this ticket, I checked out this branch and pulled and did everything as instructed, but ignored
./sage info polymake
. This did not work (yes I didn't follow the instructions completely).When I paid attention to
./sage info polymake
and installed the perl thing, it worked fine.If somehow possible, it would be nice to have
./sage i polymake
work without any prereqs again. But I have no idea whats going on and whether this depends on my specific computer or not.I just wanted to point out, that the update to polymake 3.2 has a prequirement that wasn't there before. You are probably aware of this, I just wanted to mention it.
Okay, thanks for the clarification. I do not know if there is a way to fix this through the installation of polymake. Since there is no section Debian in the installation instruction coming from sage info polymake
which one did you execute? The ubuntu ones? None?
comment:57 in reply to: ↑ 55 ; followup: ↓ 59 Changed 2 years ago by
File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 823, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: p.N_LATTICE_POINTS # optional  polymake Expected: used package latte LattE (Lattice point Enumeration) is a computer software dedicated to the problems of counting lattice points and integration inside convex polytopes. Copyright by Matthias Koeppe, Jesus A. De Loera and others. http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~latte/ 27 Got: 27
Typing in the terminal I get:
$ sage experimental [package]...............................[latest version] ([version]) perl_term_readline_gnu..................1.35 (1.35) polymake................................3.2r4 (3.2r4)
I do get the verbose out from using polymake3.2r4
. And all tests passed on an fresh install on a Ubuntu machine. Could you make sure that you used the latest polymake
? Somehow it seems really odd to me and I can't figure out why it does not show the verbose in your case.
comment:58 in reply to: ↑ 56 Changed 2 years ago by
./sage info polymake ... A distributionindependent way to install Perl modules (into a user's home directory) is using CPAN. cpan i XML::Writer XML::LibXML XML::LibXSLT File::Slurp
This did the job. I also did
sage i 4ti2 latte_int topcom qhull
then, but this has most likely nothing to do with the issue.
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to ghkliem:
Ok, let's try again.
In my current Sage installation I had polymake 3.1 installed. When installing it, this worked out of the box. So a simply run of
./sage i polymake
and I had polymake 3.3. No prereqs.When testing this ticket, I checked out this branch and pulled and did everything as instructed, but ignored
./sage info polymake
. This did not work (yes I didn't follow the instructions completely).When I paid attention to
./sage info polymake
and installed the perl thing, it worked fine.If somehow possible, it would be nice to have
./sage i polymake
work without any prereqs again. But I have no idea whats going on and whether this depends on my specific computer or not.I just wanted to point out, that the update to polymake 3.2 has a prequirement that wasn't there before. You are probably aware of this, I just wanted to mention it.
Okay, thanks for the clarification. I do not know if there is a way to fix this through the installation of polymake. Since there is no section Debian in the installation instruction coming from
sage info polymake
which one did you execute? The ubuntu ones? None?
comment:59 in reply to: ↑ 57 Changed 2 years ago by
kliem@cofio:~/localhome/sage$ sage experimental [package]...............................[latest version] ([version]) autotools...............................20141105.p0 (not_installed) cocoalib................................0.99564 (not_installed) compilerwrapper.........................1.2 (not_installed) gap3....................................04jul17 (not_installed) libtheora...............................1.1.1 (not_installed) lie.....................................2.2.2 (not_installed) modular_decomposition...................20100607 (not_installed) perl_term_readline_gnu..................1.35 (1.35) polymake................................3.2r4 (3.2r4) qepcad..................................B.1.71 (not_installed) scipoptsuite............................5.0.1 (not_installed) surf....................................1.0.6gcc6 (not_installed) valgrind................................3.10.0 (not_installed)
Replying to jipilab:
File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 823, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: p.N_LATTICE_POINTS # optional  polymake Expected: used package latte LattE (Lattice point Enumeration) is a computer software dedicated to the problems of counting lattice points and integration inside convex polytopes. Copyright by Matthias Koeppe, Jesus A. De Loera and others. http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~latte/ 27 Got: 27Typing in the terminal I get:
$ sage experimental [package]...............................[latest version] ([version]) perl_term_readline_gnu..................1.35 (1.35) polymake................................3.2r4 (3.2r4)I do get the verbose out from using
polymake3.2r4
. And all tests passed on an fresh install on a Ubuntu machine. Could you make sure that you used the latestpolymake
? Somehow it seems really odd to me and I can't figure out why it does not show the verbose in your case.
comment:60 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Summary changed from Upgrade polymake to version 3.2r4 to Upgrade polymake to version 3.3
comment:61 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:62 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 7ca4434de75f0594173f8e39cf25574bf049796d to 38319e21646ff1debd805d5d81a4bfa0be345014
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
38319e2  Update polymake to version 3.3

comment:63 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 38319e21646ff1debd805d5d81a4bfa0be345014 to 2879106058ba56fb9e3b422d709a377378b1f6d2
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
2879106  Added a required package for polymake install

comment:64 Changed 2 years ago by
Achhhh...
libjsonperl is now a requirement since version 3.3:
https://polymake.org/doku.php/news/release_3_3
I added it to the Ubuntu requirements, I will check how to install this on other platforms...
comment:65 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:66 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 2879106058ba56fb9e3b422d709a377378b1f6d2 to 6755b5bc7086cd1647caa9767a8ddeefb5808446
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
6755b5b  Added readkey dependency

comment:67 Changed 2 years ago by
 Keywords thursdaysbdx added
comment:68 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 6755b5bc7086cd1647caa9767a8ddeefb5808446 to 7ca4434de75f0594173f8e39cf25574bf049796d
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
comment:69 Changed 2 years ago by
 Summary changed from Upgrade polymake to version 3.3 to Upgrade polymake to version 3.2r4
It seems that polymake 3.3 does not compile out of the box on my stable Debian distribution...
I feel like version 3.3 should be a separate ticket and have a compiling, and working version of polymake as an experimental package. It is better than having the very latest release which fails to compile. Once this ticket is merged, I might invest time again to figure out what goes wrong in the compilation.
comment:70 Changed 2 years ago by
@MKoeppe: could you eventually check that the above works on OSX machine?
Best,
comment:71 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:72 Changed 2 years ago by
This ticket with polymake 3.3 (before last push) compile on ubuntu 16.04.
comment:73 Changed 2 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage8.7 to sage8.8
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed (if you don't believe this ticket is appropriate for the Sage 8.8 release please retarget manually)
comment:74 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc ghsophiasage added
comment:75 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 7ca4434de75f0594173f8e39cf25574bf049796d to b674466d9b27a993724fcf301ad353cf435869f6
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
b674466  Merge branch 'public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4' of trac.sagemath.org:sage into 24905

comment:76 followup: ↓ 77 Changed 2 years ago by
I tried to compile on macOS Mojave and it failed. I attached my log file.
comment:77 in reply to: ↑ 76 ; followup: ↓ 78 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to selia:
I tried to compile on macOS Mojave and it failed. I attached my log file.
The failure was reported on the polymake forum here:
comment:78 in reply to: ↑ 77 ; followup: ↓ 79 Changed 2 years ago by
comment:79 in reply to: ↑ 78 ; followup: ↓ 80 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to slelievre:
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to selia:
I tried to compile on macOS Mojave and it failed. I attached my log file.
The failure was reported on the polymake forum here:
Upstream say this is fixed in Polymake 3.4, released 20190415.
Should we upgrade to Polymake 3.4 instead of 3.2 in this ticket?
+1. It makes no sense to upgrade to 3.2 before 3.4.
comment:80 in reply to: ↑ 79 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to vdelecroix:
Replying to slelievre:
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to selia:
I tried to compile on macOS Mojave and it failed. I attached my log file.
The failure was reported on the polymake forum here:
Upstream say this is fixed in Polymake 3.4, released 20190415.
Should we upgrade to Polymake 3.4 instead of 3.2 in this ticket?
+1. It makes no sense to upgrade to 3.2 before 3.4.
Agreed. Although the version 3.3 did not compile on debian stretch and this is why I thought that having 3.2rc4 working could have fixed the backend quickly. Since I do not know how long it will take to make the version 3.4 work, I thought it is better to do things one step at a time.
The whole interface was broken and at least now it works on debian and they proposed a fix.
Anyhow, yes, we can just skip to 3.4, let's just hope it is not a quantum leap...
comment:81 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from b674466d9b27a993724fcf301ad353cf435869f6 to 3c968c3b13985ed1a940ed3c3457a534ba8df40f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
3c968c3  Merge tag '8.8.beta3' into t/24905/public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4

comment:82 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 3c968c3b13985ed1a940ed3c3457a534ba8df40f to 4fa202d3a4fa46729696e10fccab676e1017d458
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
4fa202d  Add to macOS install instructions for polymake

comment:83 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 4fa202d3a4fa46729696e10fccab676e1017d458 to c6f05d8ce24f06d4a97ff4f938e5db1fad7e7472
comment:84 Changed 2 years ago by
 Dependencies #24921, #25112, #24152 deleted
 Description modified (diff)
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
 Summary changed from Upgrade polymake to version 3.2r4 to Upgrade polymake to version 3.4
Upgrading to 3.4 now. Builds OK on Mac OS Mojave (see updated instructions for prerequisites!)
Many test failures from
./sage t optional=sage,polymake src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py
comment:85 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from c6f05d8ce24f06d4a97ff4f938e5db1fad7e7472 to 8510124d3559850a6592601828e01a039ff16453
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7339ef6  polymake doc test fixes: list of properties, output

7018013  polymake doctest: Mark a doctest random that depends on installed packages

78c10fb  Polymake._tab_completion: Fix for new apropos format in Polymake 3.4

1699019  Doctest fix for polymake 3.4: false/true instead of 0/1

f595909  Doctest fix for polymake 3.4: Use different function from the tropical application

76701f6  Doctest fix for polymake 3.4: Differences in available properties

83b51de  Polymake 3.4: Fix for typeof small objects

8510124  Polymake: Remove copy/paste error handling for code that cannot raise

comment:86 followup: ↓ 88 Changed 2 years ago by
Works now (on macOS Mojave). Please test on other platforms.
The following gives sporadic errors (can happen during doctest too):
sage: polymake.eval('help "TRIANGULATION";')  OSError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput1418a26ee8f157> in <module>() > 1 polymake.eval('help "TRIANGULATION";') /Users/mkoeppe/s/sage/sagerebasing/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.pyc in eval(self, code, strip, synchronize, locals, allow_use_file, split_lines, **kwds) 1349 elif split_lines: 1350 return '\n'.join([self._eval_line(L, allow_use_file=allow_use_file, **kwds) > 1351 for L in code.split('\n') if L != '']) 1352 else: 1353 return self._eval_line(code, allow_use_file=allow_use_file, **kwds) /Users/mkoeppe/s/sage/sagerebasing/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.pyc in _eval_line(self, line, allow_use_file, wait_for_prompt, restart_if_needed, **kwds) 1020 i = pat 1021 while i: > 1022 self._expect.send(chr(3)) 1023 sleep(0.1) 1024 i = self._expect.expect(self._prompt, timeout=0.1) /Users/mkoeppe/s/sage/sagerebasing/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/pexpect/pty_spawn.pyc in send(self, s) 566 567 b = self._encoder.encode(s, final=False) > 568 return os.write(self.child_fd, b) 569 570 def sendline(self, s=''): OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error
comment:87 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:88 in reply to: ↑ 86 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to mkoeppe:
Works now (on macOS Mojave). Please test on other platforms.
The following gives sporadic errors (can happen during doctest too):
sage: polymake.eval('help "TRIANGULATION";')  OSError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput1418a26ee8f157> in <module>() > 1 polymake.eval('help "TRIANGULATION";') /Users/mkoeppe/s/sage/sagerebasing/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.pyc in eval(self, code, strip, synchronize, locals, allow_use_file, split_lines, **kwds) 1349 elif split_lines: 1350 return '\n'.join([self._eval_line(L, allow_use_file=allow_use_file, **kwds) > 1351 for L in code.split('\n') if L != '']) 1352 else: 1353 return self._eval_line(code, allow_use_file=allow_use_file, **kwds) /Users/mkoeppe/s/sage/sagerebasing/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.pyc in _eval_line(self, line, allow_use_file, wait_for_prompt, restart_if_needed, **kwds) 1020 i = pat 1021 while i: > 1022 self._expect.send(chr(3)) 1023 sleep(0.1) 1024 i = self._expect.expect(self._prompt, timeout=0.1) /Users/mkoeppe/s/sage/sagerebasing/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/pexpect/pty_spawn.pyc in send(self, s) 566 567 b = self._encoder.encode(s, final=False) > 568 return os.write(self.child_fd, b) 569 570 def sendline(self, s=''): OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error
Is there a way to control/predict this kind of behavior? It would be annoying to have such errors in the doctests.
Since it is an experimental package, this could be tolerable, but it would be good to grasp how this occurs...
I will this new branch.
comment:89 Changed 2 years ago by
Compilation works on debian.
I get the following errors in the interface:
sage t polymake.py ********************************************************************** File "polymake.py", line 884, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: c # optional  polymake Expected: cube of dimension 15 Got: <repr(<sage.interfaces.polymake.PolymakeElement at 0x7fe892d55cd0>) failed: PolymakeError: Can't locate object method "description" via package "1" (perhaps you forgot to load "1"?)> ********************************************************************** File "polymake.py", line 886, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._eval_line Failed example: c.N_VERTICES # optional  polymake Expected: 32768 Got: Member function 'N_VERTICES' of print ref(@SAGE590); 1 object ********************************************************************** File "polymake.py", line 1133, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake.application Failed example: q.VERY_AMPLE # optional  polymake Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake.application[3]>", line 1, in <module> q.VERY_AMPLE # optional  polymake File "/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1680, in __getattr__ raise AttributeError AttributeError **********************************************************************
All tests pass on the backend_polymake.py
.
Will investigate.
comment:90 Changed 2 years ago by
I lauched the test with:
sage t src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom,polymake
Here is a longer trace about the last doctest failure:
sage: q = polymake.new_object("Polytope", INEQUALITIES=[[5,4,0,1],[3,0,4,1],[2,1,0,0],[4,4,4,1],[0,0,1,0],[8,0,0,1],[1,0,1,0],[3,1,0,0]]) sage: q.H_VECTOR 1 5 5 1 sage: q.F_VECTOR 8 14 8 sage: q.VERY_AMPLE /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py:1064: RuntimeWarning: could not compute 'HILBERT_BASIS_GENERATORS' probably because of unsatisfied preconditions: precondition : POINTED ( HILBERT_BASIS_GENERATORS , N_HILBERT_BASIS : ) warnings.warn(w, RuntimeWarning) /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py:1064: RuntimeWarning: rule VERY_AMPLE : GRAPH.ADJACENCY, GRAPH.EDGE_DIRECTIONS, N_VERTICES, VERTICES, FACETS  INEQUALITIES failed: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /home/jplabbe/sage/local/share/polymake/apps/polytope/rules/lattice.rules line 603. warnings.warn(w, RuntimeWarning) /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py:1064: RuntimeWarning: rule HILBERT_BASIS_GENERATORS , N_HILBERT_BASIS : failed: *** Missing external software: *** To compute Hilbert bases you need to have one of the following: ***  bundled:libnormaliz enabled (requires boost, rerun configure) ***  4ti2 installed and configured (check 'show_unconfigured;') warnings.warn(w, RuntimeWarning)  AttributeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput71f21cb7f3e00> in <module>() > 1 q.VERY_AMPLE /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.pyc in __getattr__(self, attrname) 1678 return P('{}>{}'.format(self._name, attrname)) 1679 except (TypeError, PolymakeError): > 1680 raise AttributeError 1681 else: 1682 return P._function_element_class()(self, '{}>{}'.format(self._name, attrname), memberfunction=True) AttributeError:
comment:91 Changed 2 years ago by
Here's the log of the configuration of polymake:
gcc version 6.3.0 20170516 (Debian 6.3.018+deb9u1) [polymake3.4] **************************************************** [polymake3.4] Package 'polymake' is currently not installed [polymake3.4] No legacy uninstaller found for 'polymake'; nothing to do [polymake3.4] checking C++ compiler ... ok (g++ std=gnu++11 is GCC 6.3.0) [polymake3.4] checking C++ library ... ok (GNU libstdc++ 20170516, C++ 201402) [polymake3.4] determining architecture ... ok (x86_64) [polymake3.4] determining compiler flags ... ok [polymake3.4] CFLAGS= march=native [polymake3.4] CXXFLAGS= std=c++14 march=native ftemplatedepth200 fnostrictaliasing Wnoparentheses Wshadow fopenmp Wnoerror=unusedfunction Wnomaybeuninitialized [polymake3.4] LDFLAGS=L/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib Wl,rpath,/home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib fuseld=gold fopenmp [polymake3.4] checking gmp installation ... ok [polymake3.4] checking mpfr installation ... ok [polymake3.4] checking boost installation ... ok [polymake3.4] checking libxml2 installation ... ok [polymake3.4] checking perl module XML::Writer ... ok [polymake3.4] checking perl module XML::LibXML ... ok [polymake3.4] checking perl module XML::LibXSLT ... ok [polymake3.4] checking perl module Term::ReadKey ... ok [polymake3.4] checking perl module Term::ReadLine ... ok [polymake3.4] checking perl module JSON ... ok [polymake3.4] checking shared perl library ... ok [polymake3.4] [polymake3.4] Configuring bundled extensions: [polymake3.4] bundled extension java ... disabled by commandline [polymake3.4] bundled extension javaview ... disabled by commandline [polymake3.4] bundled extension soplex ... disabled by commandline [polymake3.4] bundled extension atint ... ok [polymake3.4] bundled extension bliss ... ok [polymake3.4] bundled extension cdd ... ok (0.94g @ system) [polymake3.4] bundled extension libnormaliz ... failed [polymake3.4] bundled extension lrs ... ok (6.2 @ system) [polymake3.4] bundled extension nauty ... disabled because of conflict with other extension: bliss [polymake3.4] bundled extension ppl ... ok (1.2.0 @ /home/jplabbe/sage/local) [polymake3.4] bundled extension scip ... failed [polymake3.4] bundled extension singular ... ok (4.1.1 @ system) [polymake3.4] bundled extension sympol ... ok (bundled) [polymake3.4] * If you want to change the configuration of bundled extensions please see build/bundled.log and try configure help.
comment:92 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 8510124d3559850a6592601828e01a039ff16453 to b6eeaa1ef687358f1407bc4aa7fce61dcba95318
comment:93 Changed 2 years ago by
Compiled fine on debian stretch and all relevant tests pass:
$ sage t /sage/src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom,polymake Using optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,polymake,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom Doctesting 1 file. sage t polymake.py [245 tests, 14.65 s]  All tests passed! 
and
$ sage t sage/src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/*.py optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom,polymake too few successful tests, not using stored timings Using optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,polymake,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom Doctesting 25 files.  All tests passed! 
comment:94 Changed 2 years ago by
 Report Upstream changed from N/A to Reported upstream. No feedback yet.
polymake patch sent upstream.
comment:95 Changed 2 years ago by
It compiled on Debian GNU/Linux 9.8 (stretch) x86_64. All relevant tests pass:
$ ./sage t src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom,polymake
too few successful tests, not using stored timings Running doctests with ID 2019042623041771ea1904. Git branch: polymake Using optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,polymake,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom Doctesting 1 file. sage t src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py [245 tests, 6.94 s]  All tests passed!  Total time for all tests: 11.6 seconds cpu time: 1.4 seconds cumulative wall time: 6.9 seconds
$ ./sage t src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/*.py optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,python2,sage,topcom,polymake
too few successful tests, not using stored timings Running doctests with ID 20190426231247322d8126. Git branch: polymake Using optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,polymake,python2,sage,topcom Doctesting 25 files. ...  All tests passed!  Total time for all tests: 65.0 seconds cpu time: 43.6 seconds cumulative wall time: 64.1 seconds
comment:96 Changed 2 years ago by
See the updated Perl module prerequisites by typing "sage info polymake".
comment:97 followup: ↓ 109 Changed 2 years ago by
It compiled on Arch Linux x86_64 (5.0.9arch11ARCH). All relevant tests pass except for three. https://trac.sagemath.org/attachment/ticket/24905/polymake.log
comment:98 followup: ↓ 99 Changed 2 years ago by
[polymake3.4] FAILED: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/autocontains_monomial.o [polymake3.4] g++ std=gnu++11 c o /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/autocontains_monomial.o MMD MT /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3. 4/src/build/Opt/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/autocontains_monomial.o MF /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/autocontains_monomial.o.d fPIC pipe std=c++14 march=native ft emplatedepth200 fnostrictaliasing Wnoparentheses Wshadow fopenmp Wnoerror=unusedfunction Wnomaybeuninitialized DPOLYMAKE_DEBUG=0 DNDEBUG O3 DPOLYMAKE_APPNAME=ideal DPOLYMAKE_BUNDLED_EXT=singular DSING_NDEBUG DOM_NDEBUG DSING_NDEBUG DOM_NDEBUG DS ING_NDEBUG DOM_NDEBUG DSING_NDEBUG DOM_NDEBUG I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include/singular I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include/s ingular I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include/ I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include/ I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/include Wnounusedvalue I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsa ge/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/bundled/singular/include/appwrappers I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/bundled/singular/include/apps I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake 3.4/src/include/appwrappers I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/include/apps I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/include/external/permlib I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/lo cal/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/include/external/TOSimplex I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/include/corewrappers I/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/include/core /srv/pu blic/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc && : 'COMPILER_USED=6.3.0' [polymake3.4] In file included from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/client.h:25:0, [polymake3.4] from ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc:6: [polymake3.4] ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/perl/calls.h: In constructor 'pm::perl::PropertyValue::PropertyValue(sv*, TOptions ...)': [polymake3.4] ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/perl/calls.h:48:7: warning: declaration of 'options' shadows a member of 'pm::perl::PropertyValue' [Wshadow] [polymake3.4] : Value(sv_arg) [polymake3.4] ^ [polymake3.4] In file included from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/client.h:21:0, [polymake3.4] from ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc:6: [polymake3.4] ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/perl/Value.h:633:16: note: shadowed declaration is here [polymake3.4] value_flags options; [polymake3.4] ^~~~~~~ [polymake3.4] In file included from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/next/SparseMatrix.h:24:0, [polymake3.4] from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/SparseMatrix.h:20, [polymake3.4] from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/PolynomialImpl.h:24, [polymake3.4] from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/next/Polynomial.h:21, [polymake3.4] from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/Polynomial.h:20, [polymake3.4] from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/ideal/next/singularIdeal.h:24, [polymake3.4] from ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/ideal/singularIdeal.h:20, [polymake3.4] from ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc:7: [polymake3.4] ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/internal/sparse2d.h: In member function 'void pm::sparse2d::sym_permute_entries<Traits>::copy(const typename Traits::ruler*, typename Traits::ruler*, const Perm&, const InvPerm&)': [polymake3.4] ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/internal/sparse2d.h:881:4: warning: declaration of 'inv_perm' shadows a member of 'pm::sparse2d::sym_permute_entries<Traits>' [Wshadow] [polymake3.4] { [polymake3.4] ^ [polymake3.4] ../../../../../../../../include/polymake/internal/sparse2d.h:906:21: note: shadowed declaration is here [polymake3.4] std::vector<int> inv_perm; [polymake3.4] ^~~~~~~~ [polymake3.4] ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc: At global scope: [polymake3.4] ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc:10:1: error: 'FunctionCallerStart4perl' does not name a type [polymake3.4] FunctionCallerStart4perl { [polymake3.4] ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [polymake3.4] ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc:13:20: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token [polymake3.4] FunctionCaller4perl(contains_monomial, meth); [polymake3.4] ^ [polymake3.4] ../../bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/generated/autocontains_monomial.cc:14:30: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token [polymake3.4] FunctionTemplateInstance4perl(0, contains_monomial, meth, contains_monomial:M, perl::Returns::normal, 0, (perl::Canned<const SingularIdeal&>)); [polymake3.4] ^ [polymake3.4] [359/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/lex_min_representative.o [polymake3.4] [360/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/orbit_permlib.o [polymake3.4] [361/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/permlib_group_tools.o [polymake3.4] [362/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/induced_action.o [polymake3.4] [363/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/conjugacy_classes.o [polymake3.4] [364/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/permlib.o [polymake3.4] [365/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/orbit.o [polymake3.4] [366/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/sparse_isotypic_components.o [polymake3.4] [367/902] COMPILE /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/apps/group/representations.o [polymake3.4] ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. [polymake3.4] Makefile:34: recipe for target 'all' failed [polymake3.4] make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 [polymake3.4] make[2]: Leaving directory '/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src' [polymake3.4] Error building polymake [polymake3.4] [polymake3.4] real 7m41.235s [polymake3.4] user 57m24.108s [polymake3.4] sys 1m28.580s [polymake3.4] ************************************************************************ [polymake3.4] Error installing package polymake3.4 [polymake3.4] ************************************************************************ [polymake3.4] Please email sagedevel (http://groups.google.com/group/sagedevel) [polymake3.4] explaining the problem and including the log file [polymake3.4] /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/logs/pkgs/polymake3.4.log [polymake3.4] Describe your computer, operating system, etc. [polymake3.4] If you want to try to fix the problem yourself, *don't* just cd to [polymake3.4] /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4 and type 'make' or whatever is appropriate. [polymake3.4] Instead, the following commands setup all environment variables [polymake3.4] correctly and load a subshell for you to debug the error: [polymake3.4] (cd '/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4' && '/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/sage' sh) [polymake3.4] When you are done debugging, you can type "exit" to leave the subshell. [polymake3.4] ************************************************************************ Makefile:2162: recipe for target '/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/lib/sage/installed/polymake3.4' failed make[1]: *** [/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/lib/sage/installed/polymake3.4] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/build/make' real 7m44,443s user 57m25,204s sys 1m28,764s *************************************************************** Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make polymake'): * package: ecl16.1.3.p0 log file: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/logs/pkgs/ecl16.1.3.p0.log build directory: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/ecl16.1.3.p0 * package: numpy1.16.0 log file: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/logs/pkgs/numpy1.16.0.log build directory: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/numpy1.16.0 * package: polymake3.4 log file: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/logs/pkgs/polymake3.4.log build directory: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4 * package: python log file: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/logs/pkgs/python.log build directory: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/python * package: r3.4.4.p1 log file: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/logs/pkgs/r3.4.4.p1.log build directory: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/r3.4.4.p1 The build directory may contain configuration files and other potentially helpful information. WARNING: if you now run 'make' again, the build directory will, by default, be deleted. Set the environment variable SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS to 'yes' to prevent this. Makefile:31: recipe for target 'polymake' failed make: *** [polymake] Error 1
comment:99 in reply to: ↑ 98 ; followup: ↓ 100 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
[polymake3.4] FAILED: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/autocontains_monomial.o
Which compiler is that? Did Sage install its own gcc?
comment:100 in reply to: ↑ 99 ; followup: ↓ 102 Changed 2 years ago by
I don't know. I suppose its the systems gcc (Debian 6.3.018+deb9u1).
(This is the default gcc in the sage subshell as well.)
Now I did ./sage i gcc
and will see if that makes any difference.
It does Replying to mkoeppe:
Replying to ghkliem:
[polymake3.4] FAILED: /srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/Opt/bundled/singular/apps/ideal/cpperl/autocontains_monomial.oWhich compiler is that? Did Sage install its own gcc?
comment:101 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from b6eeaa1ef687358f1407bc4aa7fce61dcba95318 to 624ac010b6185ea4bd4da9a2cb4485cef1d58f4f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
624ac01  polymake: Also provide core functions

comment:102 in reply to: ↑ 100 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghkliem:
I don't know. I suppose its the systems gcc (Debian 6.3.018+deb9u1).
(This is the default gcc in the sage subshell as well.)
Now I did
./sage i gcc
and will see if that makes any difference.It does
It may also be worth checking whether polymake builds OK from its source package with your system's gcc.
comment:103 Changed 2 years ago by
(outside of sage.)
comment:104 Changed 2 years ago by
polymake 3.3 worked fine. I didn't check with polymake 3.4.
comment:105 Changed 2 years ago by
Now my sage is messed up.
Those are some of the error that occure
File "src/sage/groups/generic.py", line 1104, in sage.groups.generic.? Failed example: F=GF(2^1279,'a') Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.groups.generic.?[14]>", line 1, in <module> F=GF(Integer(2)**Integer(1279),'a') File "sage/structure/factory.pyx", line 367, in sage.structure.factory.UniqueFactory.__call__ (build/cythonized/sage/structure/factory.c:2059) key, kwds = self.create_key_and_extra_args(*args, **kwds) File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_constructor.py", line 566, in create_key_and_extra_args raise ValueError("the order of a finite field must be a prime power") ValueError: the order of a finite field must be a prime power ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/groups/generic.py", line 1105, in sage.groups.generic.? Failed example: n=F.cardinality()1 # Mersenne prime Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.groups.generic.?[15]>", line 1, in <module> n=F.cardinality()Integer(1) # Mersenne prime AttributeError: 'IntegerFactorization' object has no attribute 'cardinality' ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/groups/generic.py", line 1106, in sage.groups.generic.? Failed example: order_from_multiple(F.random_element(),n,factorization=[(n,1)],operation='*')==n Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.groups.generic.?[16]>", line 1, in <module> order_from_multiple(F.random_element(),n,factorization=[(n,Integer(1))],operation='*')==n AttributeError: 'IntegerFactorization' object has no attribute 'random_element'
It seems that almost nothing works anymore. I have no idea what I can do about it besides deleting everything and reinstalling sage.
Those errors are happening in the develop branch as well.
By the way, nothing works in src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py. This is the start of a very long list.
kliem@zancara:~/localhome/patchbotsage/sage$ sage t long src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py optional=bliss,ccache,dochtml,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,openssl,pynormaliz,python2,sage,polymake too many failed tests, not using stored timings Running doctests with ID 20190427224317aca10dd8. Git branch: develop Using optional=bliss,ccache,dochtml,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,openssl,polymake,pynormaliz,python2,sage Doctesting 1 file. sage t long src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 71, in sage.interfaces.polymake.PolymakeError Failed example: polymake.eval('print foo;') # optional polymake Expected: Traceback (most recent call last): ... PolymakeError: Unquoted string "foo" may clash with future reserved word... Got: <BLANKLINE> Traceback (most recent call last): File "/import/sage7.4/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 498, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/import/sage7.4/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 861, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.PolymakeError[0]>", line 1, in <module> polymake.eval('print foo;') # optional polymake AttributeError: Polymake instance has no attribute 'eval' ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 86, in sage.interfaces.polymake.polymake_console Failed example: from sage.interfaces.polymake import polymake_console Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/import/sage7.4/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 498, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/import/sage7.4/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 861, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.polymake_console[0]>", line 1, in <module> from sage.interfaces.polymake import polymake_console ImportError: No module named polymake ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 127, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake Failed example: p = polymake.rand_sphere(4, 20, seed=5) # optional  polymake Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/import/sage7.4/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 498, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/import/sage7.4/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 861, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake[0]>", line 1, in <module> p = polymake.rand_sphere(Integer(4), Integer(20), seed=Integer(5)) # optional  polymake AttributeError: Polymake instance has no attribute 'rand_sphere' **********************************************************************
comment:106 Changed 2 years ago by
When I run polymake in the sage subshell I get a compilation error upon running $p = rand_sphere<4,20>;
.
comment:107 followup: ↓ 108 Changed 2 years ago by
Run a sage distclean
and reinstall sage from scratch. Installing polymake also broke my sage somehow a some point. Reinstalling worked for me.
comment:108 in reply to: ↑ 107 Changed 2 years ago by
I already did it. Now openssl
isn't working again. It will take a while until I have a working version of sage on this machine again.
Replying to jipilab:
Run a
sage distclean
and reinstall sage from scratch. Installing polymake also broke my sage somehow a some point. Reinstalling worked for me.
comment:109 in reply to: ↑ 97 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to ghLaisRast:
It compiled on Arch Linux x86_64 (5.0.9arch11ARCH). All relevant tests pass except for three. https://trac.sagemath.org/attachment/ticket/24905/polymake.log
Thanks for checking. In these three doctests it looks like polymake is emitting some extra newlines. This is probably some nondeterministic pty interaction.
comment:110 followups: ↓ 111 ↓ 112 Changed 2 years ago by
polymake 3.4 on macOS Mojave (built within sage, but also the official DMG from the polymake website) dies if one presses ^C
in quick succession during a computation such as the following:
$p = cube(20); $p>VOLUME;
comment:111 in reply to: ↑ 110 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to mkoeppe:
polymake 3.4 on macOS Mojave (built within sage, but also the official DMG from the polymake website) dies if one presses
^C
in quick succession during a computation such as the following:$p = cube(20); $p>VOLUME;
Similar on debian using ./sage polymake
.
comment:112 in reply to: ↑ 110 ; followup: ↓ 113 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to mkoeppe:
polymake 3.4 on macOS Mojave (built within sage, but also the official DMG from the polymake website) dies if one presses
^C
in quick succession during a computation such as the following:$p = cube(20); $p>VOLUME;
polymake 3.2 (from the official DMG) has the same problem.
comment:113 in reply to: ↑ 112 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to mkoeppe:
Replying to mkoeppe:
polymake 3.4 on macOS Mojave (built within sage, but also the official DMG from the polymake website) dies if one presses
^C
in quick succession during a computation such as the following:$p = cube(20); $p>VOLUME;polymake 3.2 (from the official DMG) has the same problem.
Likewise, polymake 3.1
comment:114 followup: ↓ 115 Changed 2 years ago by
I set up my sage again and everything worked (all tests passed).
After installing polymake (and normaliz pynormaliz 4ti2 latte_int topcom qhull) I am getting the following failure:
kliem@zancara:~/localhome/patchbotsage/sage$ ./sage t long src/sage/rings/integer.pyx exitfirst too many failed tests, not using stored timings Running doctests with ID 20190428222717978fe65b. Git branch: polymake Using optional=4ti2,bliss,cmake,dochtml,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,ninja_build,normaliz,openssl,pynormaliz,python2,qhull,sage,topcom Doctesting 1 file. sage t long src/sage/rings/integer.pyx ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/rings/integer.pyx", line 3009, in sage.rings.integer.Integer.divisors Failed example: for i in range(20): # long time try: alarm(RDF.random_element(1e3, 0.5)) _ = n.divisors() cancel_alarm() # we never get here except AlarmInterrupt: pass Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/srv/public/kliem/patchbotsage/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.rings.integer.Integer.divisors[20]>", line 4, in <module> _ = n.divisors() File "sage/rings/integer.pyx", line 3079, in sage.rings.integer.Integer.divisors (build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:19767) ptr = <unsigned long*>check_allocarray(divisor_count, 3 * sizeof(unsigned long)) File "memory.pxd", line 87, in cysignals.memory.check_allocarray (build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:47077) MemoryError: failed to allocate 33554432 * 24 bytes ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 1 of 21 in sage.rings.integer.Integer.divisors [1127 tests, 1 failure, 19.40 s]  sage t long src/sage/rings/integer.pyx # 1 doctest failed  Total time for all tests: 19.6 seconds cpu time: 19.4 seconds cumulative wall time: 19.4 seconds
This looks familiar and indeed I have had this issue before:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sagedevel/wqnilUCLsT4
The last time I had this issue this also happened in connection with this ticket on a different machine.
There are several more failures in this file, but I believe they are all due to the same issue.
comment:115 in reply to: ↑ 114 ; followup: ↓ 116 Changed 2 years ago by
 Reviewers set to Matthias Koeppe, JeanPhilippe Labbé
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Replying to ghkliem:
[snip]
I do not think that this error is related to this ticket as we are not touching the file src/sage/rings/integer.pyx
directly, nor does the installation (as far as I can see) is related to this module. This looks like a local error on this machine.
Considering that:
 This error was not so far reproduced on other machines,
 that the package is experimental,
 it compiles on macOS Mojave, debian, and ArchLinux?,
I would set this ticket to positive review. Further issues can be reported here: #22710.
comment:116 in reply to: ↑ 115 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to jipilab:
Replying to ghkliem:
[snip]
I do not think that this error is related to this ticket as we are not touching the file
src/sage/rings/integer.pyx
directly, nor does the installation (as far as I can see) is related to this module. This looks like a local error on this machine.
I have this error occuring on two different machines and it's installation dependent (on one machine it only shows up in one installation). As it hasn't been there in this installation before installing normaliz pynormaliz 4ti2 latte_int topcom qhull polymake, I suppose that one of them for some strange reason causes alarm
to not work correctly anymore (this causes the memory overflow as the list of divisors is too long for ./sage t
default).
It is possible that a patchbot cannot have polymake installed. But I'm not certain of this yet.
Considering that:
 This error was not so far reproduced on other machines,
 that the package is experimental,
 it compiles on macOS Mojave, debian, and ArchLinux?,
I would set this ticket to positive review. Further issues can be reported here: #22710.
comment:117 Changed 2 years ago by
I can't seem to reproduce a failure in the tests for src/sage/rings/integer.pyx
.
comment:118 Changed 2 years ago by
The failure has nothing to do with this ticket.
I updated my post on sagedevel.
It seems that many patchbots fail that test in the sense that alarm interrupt takes way too long (they all take about a minute for this file and this seems to be the reason why).
In my case the machine allocates the list for the divisors already, which exceeds the default allowance for .sage t
.
comment:119 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
These two doctests need to be marked optional
sage t long /usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py ********************************************************************** File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1097, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._tab_completion Failed example: 'show_credits' in dir(polymake) Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._tab_completion[0]>", line 1, in <module> 'show_credits' in dir(polymake) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/tab_completion.py", line 52, in __dir__ return dir(self.__class__) + list(self.__dict__) + tab_fn() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1107, in _tab_completion self._start() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 362, in _start Expect._start(self, alt_message=None) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 523, in _start raise RuntimeError("unable to start %s: %s" % (self.name(), msg)) RuntimeError: unable to start polymake: End Of File (EOF). Exception style platform. Polymake finished running /usr/bin/env TERM=dumb polymake command: /usr/bin/env args: ['/usr/bin/env', 'TERM=dumb', 'polymake'] buffer (last 100 chars): '' before (last 100 chars): '/usr/bin/env: \xe2\x80\x98polymake\xe2\x80\x99: No such file or directory\r\n' after: <class 'pexpect.exceptions.EOF'> match: None match_index: None exitstatus: 127 flag_eof: True pid: 26727 child_fd: 15 closed: False timeout: None delimiter: <class 'pexpect.exceptions.EOF'> logfile: None logfile_read: None logfile_send: None maxread: 4194304 ignorecase: False searchwindowsize: None delaybeforesend: None delayafterclose: 0.1 delayafterterminate: 0.1 searcher: searcher_re: 0: re.compile('polytope > ') ********************************************************************** File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1102, in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._tab_completion Failed example: 'lex_ordered' in dir(polymake) Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 671, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 1095, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._tab_completion[1]>", line 1, in <module> 'lex_ordered' in dir(polymake) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/tab_completion.py", line 52, in __dir__ return dir(self.__class__) + list(self.__dict__) + tab_fn() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 1107, in _tab_completion self._start() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/polymake.py", line 362, in _start Expect._start(self, alt_message=None) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/interfaces/expect.py", line 523, in _start raise RuntimeError("unable to start %s: %s" % (self.name(), msg)) RuntimeError: unable to start polymake: End Of File (EOF). Exception style platform. Polymake finished running /usr/bin/env TERM=dumb polymake command: /usr/bin/env args: ['/usr/bin/env', 'TERM=dumb', 'polymake'] buffer (last 100 chars): '' before (last 100 chars): '/usr/bin/env: \xe2\x80\x98polymake\xe2\x80\x99: No such file or directory\r\n' after: <class 'pexpect.exceptions.EOF'> match: None match_index: None exitstatus: 127 flag_eof: True pid: 26731 child_fd: 15 closed: False timeout: None delimiter: <class 'pexpect.exceptions.EOF'> logfile: None logfile_read: None logfile_send: None maxread: 4194304 ignorecase: False searchwindowsize: None delaybeforesend: None delayafterclose: 0.1 delayafterterminate: 0.1 searcher: searcher_re: 0: re.compile('polytope > ') ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 2 of 3 in sage.interfaces.polymake.Polymake._tab_completion [24 tests, 2 failures, 0.09 s]
comment:120 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 624ac010b6185ea4bd4da9a2cb4485cef1d58f4f to 666db96aad37cc2b5d3567eec49905a54a5f2f01
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
666db96  Added two missing optional tags

comment:121 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:122 Changed 2 years ago by
please provide a precise link to the tarball. The link in the description leads to source tarball, minimal tarball, etc...
comment:123 Changed 2 years ago by
The wget command line has the URL.
comment:124 Changed 2 years ago by
I see  but the instructions like this are flaky. By right, one has to get the branch and the tarball first, and only then go about building things. Otherwise chances are that building chokes up on an unavailable tarball.
And you should run make build
to get all the deps right (sage b
is really a quick and dirty plug that should go away)
comment:125 followup: ↓ 126 Changed 2 years ago by
why does one need libncursesdev
? Sage provides ncurses, and as soon as #27277 is in, it should be able to use system's (n)curses.
comment:126 in reply to: ↑ 125 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
why does one need
libncursesdev
? Sage provides ncurses, and as soon as #27277 is in, it should be able to use system's (n)curses.
This might be copypaste from polymake install instructions. Certainly the ncurses
spkg is pulled in via perl_term_readline_gnu
and readline
. It would be good to test if the install works without this system package (it should).
comment:127 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:128 Changed 2 years ago by
OK  the previous instruction didn't work if polymake was already installed. (Surely, the fact that it's an experimental package only makes it more complicated).
comment:129 Changed 2 years ago by
some errors, please have a look at misposted https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27763#comment:9 and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27763#comment:11
comment:130 Changed 2 years ago by
Please apply this

src/sage/interfaces/polymake.py
a b class Polymake(ExtraTabCompletion, Expect): 874 874 sometimes it hangs, and therefore we remove it from the tests, for now:: 875 875 876 876 sage: c = polymake.cube(15) # optional  polymake 877 sage: polymake.eval('print {}>F_VECTOR;'.format(c.name()), timeout=1) # optional  polymake # not tested877 sage: polymake.eval('print {}>F_VECTOR;'.format(c.name()), timeout=1) # not tested # optional  polymake 878 878 Traceback (most recent call last): 879 879 ... 880 880 RuntimeError: Polymake fails to respond timely
this order indeed suppresses running this line, otherwise it does not work for me.
comment:131 Changed 2 years ago by
Very strange. I don't think the order of these annotations makes a difference
comment:132 Changed 2 years ago by
The doctesting framework is a pile of ....  so I'm not surprised that on different platforms it behaves differently. E.g. we see doctests passing with serial
options and mysteriously crashing without it.
comment:133 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 666db96aad37cc2b5d3567eec49905a54a5f2f01 to 4e91dcc26a4c1be6ce6b298b572a9d748933a719
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
4e91dcc  Change format of a 'not tested' doc test annotation

comment:134 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 4e91dcc26a4c1be6ce6b298b572a9d748933a719 to a3a8247aa0530c17188e652a3e4a6eb309db050a
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a3a8247  update docs, as discussed on #24905

comment:135 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
looks good now.
comment:136 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from a3a8247aa0530c17188e652a3e4a6eb309db050a to 56bf67aac222abe08259a3359f15b5597c654a3d
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. This was a forced push. New commits:
575c2e1  Add support for unconditional pre and postcheck actions in spkgconfigure.m4

46ae057  Refactor the mpir/spkgconfigure.m4 (and to a lesser extent the one for gmp) to use the new pre and post arguments to SAGE_SPKG_CONFIGURE

a79e020  Refactor the mpir/spkgconfigure.m4 (and to a lesser extent the one for gmp) to use the new pre and post arguments to SAGE_SPKG_CONFIGURE

d6024f3  Trac #27642: Initial attempt at fix: rerun `configure` and `make allbuild` after

56bf67a  leave GMP's spkgconfigure.m4 as it was

comment:137 Changed 2 years ago by
oops, sorry, I keep pushing into wrong branches these days! Please save your old branch...
comment:138 Changed 2 years ago by
specifically, Matthias, could you forcepush your last https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24905#comment:133 ?
comment:139 Changed 2 years ago by
On https://github.com/sagemath/sagetracmirror/tree/public/upgrade_polymake_to_version_3_2r4
we have everything till comment:101  so I can recreate the thing from history here... <facepalm>
comment:140 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 56bf67aac222abe08259a3359f15b5597c654a3d to 1fd7112fc8cbfa4d9cb4638047ece3f83bda3806
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. Last 10 new commits:
f595909  Doctest fix for polymake 3.4: Use different function from the tropical application

76701f6  Doctest fix for polymake 3.4: Differences in available properties

83b51de  Polymake 3.4: Fix for typeof small objects

8510124  Polymake: Remove copy/paste error handling for code that cannot raise

3c6ae95  polymake: Make normaliz a dependency

b6eeaa1  polymake: Add a patch to polymake's libnormaliz configure

624ac01  polymake: Also provide core functions

9440e3d  Added two missing optional tags

5c598b0  Change format of a 'not tested' doc test annotation

1fd7112  update docs, as discussed on #24905

comment:141 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
OK, this looks like a correctly recovered branch to me.
comment:142 Changed 2 years ago by
On Debian I also had to install libtermreadkeyperl
comment:143 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 1fd7112fc8cbfa4d9cb4638047ece3f83bda3806 to 05f3e612e8f32af5d453f2968eaab81fa4427912
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
comment:144 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 05f3e612e8f32af5d453f2968eaab81fa4427912 to 53c8ee65d8803ffe4762d260bc173ae6763a7203
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
53c8ee6  Mention libtermreadkeyperl

comment:145 Changed 2 years ago by
I restored the old branch and cherrypicked your "update docs" commit
comment:146 Changed 2 years ago by
 Reviewers changed from Matthias Koeppe, JeanPhilippe Labbé to Matthias Koeppe, JeanPhilippe Labbé, Dima Pasechnik
comment:147 Changed 2 years ago by
could you also mention libtermreadlinegnuperl as a package to install on Debian/Ubuntu?
comment:148 Changed 2 years ago by
Perhaps it's time to change this package from "experimental" to "optional"?
comment:149 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 53c8ee65d8803ffe4762d260bc173ae6763a7203 to b613e57983e061c8ed3413b1e6e7877608cc2d41
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
b613e57  Mention libtermreadlinegnuperl

comment:150 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from b613e57983e061c8ed3413b1e6e7877608cc2d41 to b89376a1961208aff924359f4d2b6573c02c2be2
comment:151 followup: ↓ 153 Changed 2 years ago by
Let's get this done and open another ticket for promotion to optional. IMHO it is not quite ready, e.g. it does not run on all supported platforms. And the installation procedure isn't nice. I don't think we have a optional package where to install it one needs to install many things by hand in an ad hoc way.
New commits:
e5c3249  polymake: Mention MOngoDB for polydb

b89376a  polymake: Update info on macOS

comment:152 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from b89376a1961208aff924359f4d2b6573c02c2be2 to 0c1b044b7717f8cd3aed07a24e37f8f82246b1f9
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
0c1b044  polymake: update MongoDB information for linux distros

comment:153 in reply to: ↑ 151 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
Let's get this done and open another ticket for promotion to optional. IMHO it is not quite ready, e.g. it does not run on all supported platforms. And the installation procedure isn't nice. I don't think we have a optional package where to install it one needs to install many things by hand in an ad hoc way.
OK, I agree, good point.
comment:154 Changed 2 years ago by
I added one more perl package. Could you check this on Linux? After adding it, the following should work:
polytope > $A = db_query( { "_id"=>"F.4D.0047" }, db=>"LatticePolytopes", collection=>"SmoothReflexive" ); polymake: used package polyDB Access to the polymake polytope database. (c) 20132018 Silke Horn, Andreas Paffenholz http://solros.de http://www.mathematik.tudarmstadt.de/~paffenholz polymake: ERROR: # # *** DEPRECATION WARNING *** # ...
(The deprecation warning is normal.}
comment:155 Changed 2 years ago by
Building 72 more Perl packages now :) Why is polymake itself not on CPAN?
comment:156 Changed 2 years ago by
this is what I got (after installing moar perl and rebuilding polymake)
$ ./sage polymake Welcome to polymake version 3.4 Copyright (c) 19972019 Ewgenij Gawrilow, Michael Joswig (TU Berlin) https://polymake.org This is free software licensed under GPL; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Press F1 or enter 'help;' for basic instructions. Application polytope currently uses following contributed and thirdparty software packages: SVG, bliss, cdd, graphviz, latte, libnormaliz, lrs, permlib, polyDB, povray, ppl, qhull, singular, sketch, sympol, threejs, tikz, tosimplex For more details: show_credits; polytope > $A = db_query( { "_id"=>"F.4D.0047" }, db=>"LatticePolytopes", collection=>"SmoothReflexive" ); polymake: used package polyDB Access to the polymake polytope database. (c) 20132018 Silke Horn, Andreas Paffenholz http://solros.de http://www.mathematik.tudarmstadt.de/~paffenholz polytope >
perhaps you could add a meaningful doctest, tagged internet
, for this?
comment:157 Changed 2 years ago by
When MongoDB is not available, the function db_query
is not even present.
Not sure if/why we want to doctest that.
Let's postpone doctesting the db_query
function in Sage to #27802, which adds support for the dictionary that appears in the argument list.
comment:159 Changed 2 years ago by
one last nitpick yum install perlTermReadLineGnu
should be added to Fedora instructions
comment:160 Changed 2 years ago by
Thank you!
comment:161 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 0c1b044b7717f8cd3aed07a24e37f8f82246b1f9 to 2eda6e11325d5d997f0de64e9d9f7add42fa7adb
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
2eda6e1  polymake: add to fedora instructions

comment:162 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:163 followup: ↓ 164 Changed 2 years ago by
Fedora's 26 perl is however not good.
[polymake3.4] FAILED: /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/perlx/5.24.4/x86_64linuxthreadmulti/Customize.cc [polymake3.4] /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp typemap /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap output /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/perlx/5.24.4/x86_64linuxthreadmulti/Customize.cc /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/lib/core/src/perl/Customize.xxs [polymake3.4] Can't open perl script "/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp": No such file or directory
This seems to be a known problem  not sure it's worthwhile to try to fix it though.
And, by the way, on stable Debian I get a problem building with (the standard) gcc 6.3.
comment:164 in reply to: ↑ 163 Changed 2 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
Fedora's 26 perl is however not good.
[polymake3.4] FAILED: /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/perlx/5.24.4/x86_64linuxthreadmulti/Customize.cc [polymake3.4] /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp typemap /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap output /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/build/perlx/5.24.4/x86_64linuxthreadmulti/Customize.cc /home/scratch2/dimpase/sage/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/polymake3.4/src/lib/core/src/perl/Customize.xxs [polymake3.4] Can't open perl script "/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp": No such file or directoryThis seems to be a known problem  not sure it's worthwhile to try to fix it though.
Known to who?
comment:165 Changed 2 years ago by
Followup ticket: Fix polymake 3.4 lrslib detection (#27803).
comment:166 Changed 2 years ago by
It's known to the internet that Fedora/Centos perform a surgery on its Perl installation resulting in breakages like in comment:163 (missing /usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/xsubpp
; of course xsubpp
is present, it's only not in this locaton, hardcoded somewhere...)
comment:167 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc paffenholz@… added
comment:168 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc kastner@… added
comment:169 followup: ↓ 170 Changed 2 years ago by
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
Too late, a previous version was released in 8.8.beta5. Move any new code to a separate ticket
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
polymake: Add ninja_build as dependency