Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #24359, comment 25
- Timestamp:
- 12/17/17 13:18:07 (3 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #24359, comment 25
initial v1 2 2 > Since parallel computation will most likely involve just one Cython module, I don't see an issue there. 3 3 4 The computation of the cohomology ring of a finite group G typically involves the computation of the cohomology rings of various subgroups of G. It would be natural to have these computed in parallel. The computation involves libmtx calls at least from sage/groups/modular_cohomology/resolution, sage/groups/modular_cohomology/cochain and sage/matrix/matrix_gfpn_dense, and these computationwould likely to be operating with ''different'' row sizes.4 The computation of the cohomology ring of a finite group G typically involves the computation of the cohomology rings of various subgroups of G. It would be natural to have these computed in parallel. It involves libmtx calls at least from sage/groups/modular_cohomology/resolution, sage/groups/modular_cohomology/cochain and sage/matrix/matrix_gfpn_dense, and these computations would likely to be operating with ''different'' row sizes.