Opened 2 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#24188 closed defect (duplicate)
CBC causes doctest failures because of linking with incompatible liblapack
Reported by: | mderickx | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | packages: optional | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description
See the logs of quasar:
Relevant part of the logs:
File "src/sage/numerical/backends/coin_backend.pyx", line 1628, in sage.numerical.backends.coin_backend.CoinBackend.get_row_price Failed example: p = get_solver(solver = "Coin") # optional - cbc Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/vdelecro/sage_patchbot/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 515, in _run self.compile_and_execute(example, compiler, test.globs) File "/home/vdelecro/sage_patchbot/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/doctest/forker.py", line 885, in compile_and_execute exec(compiled, globs) File "<doctest sage.numerical.backends.coin_backend.CoinBackend.get_row_price[1]>", line 1, in <module> p = get_solver(solver = "Coin") # optional - cbc File "sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx", line 1650, in sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend.get_solver (build/cythonized/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.c:21055) cpdef GenericBackend get_solver(constraint_generation = False, solver = None, base_ring = None): File "sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.pyx", line 1785, in sage.numerical.backends.generic_backend.get_solver (build/cythonized/sage/numerical/backends/generic_backend.c:20378) from sage.numerical.backends.coin_backend import CoinBackend ImportError: /usr/lib/liblapack.so.3: undefined symbol: sgetrs_N_parallel
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-8.1 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Thanks for pointing this out.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
This is a duplicate of #22006.