Opened 5 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#24101 closed enhancement (fixed)
Implement Katz centrality and related methods for graphs
Reported by:  clienkaemper  Owned by:  ghrajat1433 

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage8.7 
Component:  graph theory  Keywords:  sd90 
Cc:  Merged in:  
Authors:  Caitlin Lienkaemper, Rajat Mittal  Reviewers:  David Coudert 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  1a87f58 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  1a87f58d508f68e838cac0ba92d47f5160b23bc4 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
want to be able to compute Katz centrality, use Katz method for link prediction in graphs/networks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_centrality)
Change History (46)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by
Branch:  → u/clienkaemper/implement_katz_centrality_and_related_methods_for_graphs 

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by
Commit:  → 99c2705ffb239f13cf58b6558ee5a66ba72f6e1c 

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by
Status:  new → needs_review 

comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by
Reviewers:  → David Coudert 

Status:  needs_review → needs_work 
Welcome to Sagemath
I have some comments to help you improving the code.
 unify
nonedges_only
andnonedgesonly
. Actually, #24094 usesnonedgesonly
. I don't know which is best, but should be the same. Returns the Katz matrix of G with parameter alpha.
>Return the Katz matrix of the graph with parameter alpha.
 only 1 empty line is needed after
INPUT::
`True`
>``True``
if true, eliminates common neighbors between adjacent vertices
. Could you add that the value for each edge is set to 0 ?the Katz matrix of the graph self with parameter alpha
>the Katz matrix of the graph with parameter alpha
G1 = Graph({1:[2,3], 2:[1,4], 3:[1,4], 4:[2,3]})
>G1 = graphs.CycleGraph(4)
? since you don't have
G2
, you could renameG1
toG
 add a space between
*
and the text in*:meth:`~katz_centrality`
and the line after  add an empty line after
TESTS::
 The examples you give in the
TESTS
could be in the examples section. In a TESTS block, we expect examples raising errors, with the empty graph, etc.  the test
alpha <= 0
should be made before any other computation if nonedges_only == True:
>if nonedges_only:
in method def katz_centrality(self, alpha):
 you could add an optional parameter
u
to return the centrality of a specified vertex. For that, addu=None
and then the return statement becomes something likeif u is None: return K else: return K[u]
 you must indent the text in 80 columns mode. Some code editors are really helpful to do that without effort
 You return a list. Wouldn't it be better to return a dictionary keyed by vertices ? How to know which value corresponds to a node ?
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
Milestone:  sage8.1 → sage8.7 

Owner:  set to ghrajat1433 
I would like to work on it. Should I work on existing branch or should I create a new one based on latest sage develop version?
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
You can either rebase this ticket on last develop branch (and fix the merge conflicts), or create a new branch based on last beta.
comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by
Branch:  u/clienkaemper/implement_katz_centrality_and_related_methods_for_graphs → u/ghrajat1433/24101_katz_centrality 

Commit:  99c2705ffb239f13cf58b6558ee5a66ba72f6e1c 
comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  → c7fff6c43966ae48eeac2ee4b974a56875b5ccc7 

comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by
Status:  needs_work → needs_review 

comment:10 Changed 4 years ago by
Several issues (I'm skipping the coding style issues for the moment, but please have a look at http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_basics.html and check how other methods are written).
In method katz_matrix
:
 add some explanation of what is a Katz matrix
 please add parameter
vertices
similarly to method.adjacency_matrix()
. This is important as in the future we will no longer ensure that the list of vertices is sorted (due to Python 3).
In method katz_centrality
 add some explanation of what is the Katz centrality, plus a link to relevant wikipedia page
 in the code, choose an order like
verts = list(self)
, and pass it tokatz_matrix
. Here we don't need the list of vertices to be sorted, we just want to know the ordering, so we fix it. u not in self.vertices()
>u not in self
 You can simplify the construction of the dictionary
 for i in range(n):  Kdict[vert[i]] = katz_values[0][i] + Kdict = {u: katz_values[0][i] for i, u in enumerate(verts)}
 Do we really need to build dictionary
Kdict
whenu
is not None ?
Do not forget to check that all tests pass and that the documentation builds properly and displays nicely.
comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  c7fff6c43966ae48eeac2ee4b974a56875b5ccc7 → 66151a6333aef8c6af48bb28eb33c53041c87e0a 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
66151a6  changes made in accordance to the review.

comment:12 followup: 15 Changed 4 years ago by
Thanks for the prompt reply and suggesting the changes. Done all the improvements mentioned above and also made sure to pass all the tests.
Regarding documentation build , can you tell me how to build it and how to check if it displaying properly.(I am new to sage)
comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  66151a6333aef8c6af48bb28eb33c53041c87e0a → 172082f5a200768a5f769cbc6373cb5a520b6c81 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
172082f  made additions for documentation.

comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  172082f5a200768a5f769cbc6373cb5a520b6c81 → 47d85e37b4a64b10405088a34adfb7b5693d9ef3 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
47d85e3  bug fix

comment:15 Changed 4 years ago by
I have done the changes as per required by the documentation in generic_graph.py file. But could not figure out how to view those changes as they will actually be looking in documentation. And is there any test command for checking if format is correct for documentation.
See http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/sage_manuals.html
You can rebuild the full documentation using
sage b && sage docbuild reference html
or rebuild only the documentation of the graph module
sage b && sage docbuild reference/graphs html
Then, you can look at the documentation with your web browser.
file://PATH_ON_YOUR_COMPUTER/sage/local/share/doc/sage/html/en/reference/graphs/index.html
For the coding style, please try to comply to https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep0008
comment:16 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  47d85e37b4a64b10405088a34adfb7b5693d9ef3 → 67a23844be9cb5a0fce4293bf02d7ce616629c91 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
67a2384  documentation build changes

comment:17 Changed 4 years ago by
I have made changes so as to build the documentation properly and also passed all the tests and tried to follow the coding convention. Can you please review the code so that we can finalize it.
comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by
 You must ensure that all comments are formatted in 80 columns mode. Some code editors can be configured to ease this task
 minor stylistic issue
  ``nonedgesonly``  Boolean (default: ``True``); if True, value for each  edge present in the graph is set to zero. +  ``nonedgesonly``  boolean (default: ``True``); if ``True``, value for each + edge present in the graph is set to zero
 you can use
for u in self
orset(self)
orif u in self
, etc. set(vertices) != set(self.vertex_iterator())): + set(vertices) != set(self)):
 pep8
 K = (In  alpha * A.transpose()).inverse()In + K = (In  alpha * A.transpose()).inverse()  In
 Missing = onesmat  A In + Missing = onesmat  A  In
 Please revise method
katz_centrality
: alignment, ensure that the code is correct, remove useless instructions, etc.
comment:19 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  67a23844be9cb5a0fce4293bf02d7ce616629c91 → 27579a233a20e790ffc17b4273699b4fa0f17534 

comment:20 Changed 4 years ago by
Thanks for the review. Its been really a learning experience. I have started following alignment and pep8 seriously and I have fixed the issues above.
comment:21 Changed 4 years ago by
Please check carefully your code, that comments are in 80 columns mode, if possible that you follow the PEP8 coding style, that the comments are sufficient and helpful to the user, and that your code is best possible.
for instance, you have apparently not double check this part:
 if u :  idx = verts.index(u)  return katz_values[0][idx]   Kdict = {}  Kdict = {u: katz_values[0][i] for i, u in enumerate(verts)}   if u is None:  return Kdict  else :  return Kdict[u] + if u: + return katz_values[0][verts.index(u)] + return {u: katz_values[0][i] for i, u in enumerate(verts)}
comment:22 Changed 4 years ago by
Status:  needs_review → needs_work 

comment:23 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  27579a233a20e790ffc17b4273699b4fa0f17534 → f85cf1b95a6091ff0d04ec370c97dd77f1a25165 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
f85cf1b  improved code

comment:24 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  f85cf1b95a6091ff0d04ec370c97dd77f1a25165 → 42019acaea411c958b480c4f8cfc1f04ffc97cd4 

comment:25 Changed 4 years ago by
Status:  needs_work → needs_review 

comment:26 Changed 4 years ago by
 except in the names of the method, use
Katz
and notkatz
everywhere.  remove trailing white spaces
 you should rephrase the description of method
katz_matrix
to first give the definition of this centrality measure, and then explain what's the returned matrix.  Avoid having too many empty lines like this. 1 is often enough
+ + +
 remove the
.
at the end of error messages if alpha <= 0:
>if alpha <= 0:

 We compute katz_centrality for the undirected 4cycle again (note that + We compute the Katz centrality of a 4cycle (note that

 Return the katz centrality of the vertex u of the graph. + Return the Katz centrality of vertex `u`.
 there is a
α
. It should be ok, but it might be safer to use\alpha
.
comment:27 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  42019acaea411c958b480c4f8cfc1f04ffc97cd4 → cb9e45b198907ebbd354128cdddc30374b63fe9b 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
cb9e45b  fixed the coding style

comment:29 Changed 4 years ago by
 to use latex in the documentation, you must write
`\alpha`
, and not only\alpha
. Usingr"""
and then`...`
indicates to use latex.
 in
katz_centrality
, when you ask for the centrality of a vertexu
, you first computekatz_values = (M*matrix(QQ, n, 1, lambda i, j: 1)).transpose()
. However, if I understand well the definition of the Katz matrix, it suffices to make the some of the values of a particular row (or column), right ? If so, you could avoid the matrix multiplication when asking for a single value.
 also, a
.
and a reciprocal of the spectral radius of the graph. (the maximum  absolute eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix ) + reciprocal of the spectral radius of the graph (the maximum + absolute eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix)
comment:30 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  cb9e45b198907ebbd354128cdddc30374b63fe9b → 3d9569b0792d34ec974ac7729c06762545e4710b 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
3d9569b  Improved Code

comment:31 Changed 4 years ago by
I have used sum function now and eliminated the multiplication step. I guess it give better complexity now in terms of space and time specially for a single vertex case.
comment:32 Changed 4 years ago by
This is much better now. We certainly same some computation time (but see point below). For the space complexity, it remains in O(n^2)
as we compute the Katz matrix in all cases.
 The test
if u and u not in self:
must be done before computingverts = list(self)
and more importantly the computation of the Katz matrix.
I have now more algorithmic questions (more interesting than coding style :P):
 What is the expected answer when the graph is not connected ? May be we can save computation time if the answer is always 0 for vertices in different components ?
 Same question for strongly connected digraphs? In the example, vertices 1, 2, 3, 7, 9 have no inneighbors and vertex 4 has no outneighbor. When you will get an answer, you should document the example explaining why some values are 0.
comment:33 Changed 4 years ago by
What is the expected answer when the graph is not connected ? May be we can save computation time if the answer is always 0 for vertices in different components ?
 When graph is not connected answer for a particular vertex is only dependent on the vertices in its connected component only and not in the other component. So yes we really can do optimize here. Will work on that.
Same question for strongly connected digraphs? In the example, vertices 1, 2, 3, 7, 9 have no inneighbors and vertex 4 has no outneighbor. When you will get an answer, you should document the example explaining why some values are 0.
 for strongly connected Digraph the answer will be non zero for every node. Also for any node with inneighbors 0 the answer will be 0 as its the very essence of katz centrality to measure influence of an actor(node here) in a social network.
Will document the example with reasoning.
comment:34 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  3d9569b0792d34ec974ac7729c06762545e4710b → c796415614414e13fcb9b80ca32b1f10f6512f61 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c796415  optimized

comment:35 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  c796415614414e13fcb9b80ca32b1f10f6512f61 → e2f562c2bba3c04e947df8813133d86cef61597a 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e2f562c  optimized

comment:36 Changed 4 years ago by
 You can get the connected component containing vertex u directly using
C = G.connected_component_containing_vertex(u, sort=False)
.
Then you must compute the Katz matrix of the subgraph, i.e.,
self.subgraph(C)
.
if u: if self.is_connected(): G = self else: G = self.subgraph(self.connected_component_containing_vertex(u, sort=False)) verts = list(G) M = G.katz_matrix(alpha, nonedgesonly=False, vertices=verts) return sum(M[verts.index(u)])
 When you compute the Katz centrality of all vertices, you want the union of the Katz centralities of each subgraph. You can use
self.connected_components_subgraphs()
comment:37 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  e2f562c2bba3c04e947df8813133d86cef61597a → 13c28217b0d813ff0e4f23f789a5113d7b816935 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
13c2821  optimized the code

comment:39 Changed 4 years ago by
Please double check your code and test it ! it contains obvious errors.
You can write directly for g in self.connected_components_subgraphs()
Add a doctest with a non connected graph, e.g., graphs.PathGraph(3) + graphs.PathGraph(4)
.
comment:40 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  13c28217b0d813ff0e4f23f789a5113d7b816935 → f47a3dd2aac48aa6d400f1a89748844a92dea0c7 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
f47a3dd  fixed the errors

comment:41 Changed 4 years ago by
I am really sorry about the previous errors. Now its fixed and well tested.
comment:42 Changed 4 years ago by
Could you change the example to sage: (graphs.PathGraph(3) + graphs.PathGraph(4)).katz_centrality(1/20)
. This is to show that the values for the vertices in the P3 and in the P4 are the same than in previous examples.
comment:43 Changed 4 years ago by
Commit:  f47a3dd2aac48aa6d400f1a89748844a92dea0c7 → 1a87f58d508f68e838cac0ba92d47f5160b23bc4 

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
1a87f58  minor addition

comment:44 Changed 4 years ago by
Could you change the example to sage: (graphs.PathGraph?(3) + graphs.PathGraph?(4)).katz_centrality(1/20). This is to show that the values for the vertices in the P3 and in the P4 are the same than in previous examples.
Done!
comment:45 Changed 4 years ago by
Authors:  Caitlin Lienkaemper → Caitlin Lienkaemper, Rajat Mittal 

Status:  needs_review → positive_review 
Further speed up improvements can certainly be obtained, but I don't know how.
For me this patch is good to go.
comment:46 Changed 4 years ago by
Branch:  u/ghrajat1433/24101_katz_centrality → 1a87f58d508f68e838cac0ba92d47f5160b23bc4 

Resolution:  → fixed 
Status:  positive_review → closed 
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
Adds functions for Katz centrality and related methods