Run doctests with OMP_NUM_THREADS=2

[jdemeyer]

The normaliz package uses OMP for threading, which can create many threads. In doctests, this is bad for two reasons:

1. Doctests should not use an unexpectedly large number of system resources.

2. When there are too many threads, the virtual memory limit from #23748 will be hit.

There is a solution: set the environment variable OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 while doctesting.

[mderickx]

Again??? :(

[jdemeyer]

New commits:

​9f9f7b7

Run doctests with OMP_NUM_THREADS=2

[mderickx]

Hi Jeroen,

I want to review this, but before doing so I run into trouble, because on my machine all doctests pass in sage 8.1.beta5 with pynormaliz. Could you give pointers to which doctests failed for you and maybe help reproduce the failure so I can better understand wether this solution works.

[jdemeyer]

In particular, many tests in src/sage/combinat/rigged_configurations fail for me with pynormaliz.

Since the problem depends on the number of threads, which is the number of cores by default, it could very well be that this problem only occurs on systems with many cores. The system where I saw the failure has 24 cores. Maybe you could get the failure with OMP_NUM_THREADS=24?

[jdemeyer]

Replying to mderickx:

Also is there any particular reason for the integer 2?

Yes, it is the smallest integer strictly larger than 1.

1 thread is too few, because it doesn't really test threading. With 2 threads, you do test threading. On the other hand, the system load will at most be a factor 200% too large, which is not too bad.

[mderickx]

Without the patch I indeed get 4 files with failing doctests if I do:

export OMP_NUM_THREADS=24
sage -t long src/sage/combinat/rigged_configurations

and it does not fail anymore with the patch. So it seems to be the right thing to do in order to fix it.

One thing that I don't like about the current patch is that it overwrites OMP_NUM_THREADS even if it is already explicitly set before running sage tests. This means that if someone for some reason wants to run the doctests with a different number of OMP_NUM_THREADS for debugging purposes that involve problems with threading then one has to modify the source code. So I think it would be better to only set OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 if nothing was set before, providing a sane default value, but still allowing a less sane default value if one really insists. What are your thoughts on this?

[jdemeyer]

Replying to mderickx:

One thing that I don't like about the current patch is that it overwrites OMP_NUM_THREADS even if it is already explicitly set before running sage tests.

I consider that a feature. The point is that doctests should be reproducible and not depend too much on the external environment. If somebody has set an environment variable OMP_NUM_THREADS, the most likely reason is that he wants to use that number of threads for actual computations. It does not mean that he wants to use that many threads for doctests too.

This means that if someone for some reason wants to run the doctests with a different number of OMP_NUM_THREADS for debugging purposes that involve problems with threading then one has to modify the source code.

Alternatively, you can set os.environ['OMP_NUM_THREADS'] in a doctest too. That's easy to do and would fix the testing problem.

[mderickx]

Ok, I am now running all the doctest after export OMP_NUM_THREADS=100 since I think standard patchbot testing is not good enough. If this passes then I will give positive review.

Does your remark mean that it would also be better to fix #23612 (edit: sorry I meant #23613) by unsetting PYTHONPATH instead of making the doctest more admissible?

[jdemeyer]

Replying to mderickx:

Does your remark mean that it would also be better to fix #23612 by unsetting PYTHONPATH instead of making the doctest more admissible?

Are you sure you mean #23612? It seems unrelated to PYTHONPATH or doctests.

[mderickx]

Sorry, I meant #23613.

[mderickx]

Ok looks good to me.

[vbraun]

Reviewer name

[embray]

I wonder if this and/or #23748 will fix the doc build problems I was having on Windows for the past several weeks (which caused me to have to take down the Window patchbot >_<). Fingers crossed...

[embray]

Oh wait, this was just for the doctests, I misread. Maybe not then...