Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#23854 new defect
some methods appear on gap but not on libgap
Reported by: | vdelecroix | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-8.2 |
Component: | interfaces | Keywords: | thursdaysbdx |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
sage: gap.StrongGeneratorsStabChain StrongGeneratorsStabChain sage: libgap.StrongGeneratorsStabChain Traceback (most recent call last): ... AttributeError: No such attribute: StrongGeneratorsStabChain.
As a workaround, this is available through
sage: S = libgap.SymmetricGroup(5) sage: T = libgap.eval('StabChain')(S) sage: libgap.eval('StrongGeneratorsStabChain')(T) [ (4,5), (3,5), (2,5), (1,5) ]
The list is long
sage: len(set(dir(gap)).difference(dir(libgap))) 11254
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 3 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-8.1 to sage-8.2
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 3 years ago by
Replying to vklein:
@vdelecroix Do you know where to find or how to generate a clean list of builtin functions (for gap 4.8.3 or later) ?
dir(gap)
alone seems to return more stuff than needed (constants and the like).
I did not investigate anything. This is just empirical constatation.
There is a list from gap's jupyter syntax highliting (here). Should we include function names from gap packages or rather do like gap's jupyter syntax highliting ? (Only 1823 new function names in the later case).
I think that this list could be obtained directly from GAP/libGAP (at execution time).
@vdelecroix Do you know where to find or generate a clean list of builtin functions (for gap 4.8.3 or later) ?
dir(gap)
alone seems to return more stuff than needed (constants and the like).There is a list from gap's jupyter syntax highliting (here). Should we include function names from gap packages or rather do like gap's jupyter syntax highliting ? (Only 1823 new function names in the later case).