Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

#23803 closed defect (fixed)

Allow graceful Sphinx upgrades

Reported by: jdemeyer Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: sage-8.1
Component: packages: standard Keywords:
Cc: jhpalmieri Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer Reviewers: John Palmieri
Report Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. Work issues:
Branch: 150baf5 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) Commit:
Dependencies: Stopgaps:

Status badges

Description (last modified by jdemeyer)

The upgrade to Sphinx-1.6.3 broke docbuilding if make doc-clean was not done. This is because the "environment pickle" from the old Sphinx failed to unpickle with the new Sphinx. This pickle is not so important, we can just ignore this error and continue.

Upstream: ​https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/4048

Change History (10)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by jdemeyer

Actually, I'm experimenting with a much simpler change to allow a graceful upgrade to Sphinx-1.6.3: it's a specific pickle which fails to load. Wrapping that in try/except might work.

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by jdemeyer

  • Authors set to Jeroen Demeyer
  • Component changed from build to packages: standard
  • Description modified (diff)
  • Summary changed from Rebuild doc when Sphinx is reinstalled to Allow graceful Sphinx upgrades

comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by jdemeyer

  • Branch set to u/jdemeyer/rebuild_doc_when_sphinx_is_reinstalled

comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by jdemeyer

  • Commit set to 150baf55e4380b63b57fe998877cd5ce70a40bdb
  • Status changed from new to needs_review

New commits:

​150baf5Allow graceful Sphinx upgrade

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by jhpalmieri

Is it worth printing more information than just 

[diophanti] loading pickled environment... failed: 'module' object has no attribute 'WarningStream'

to let users know that this is indeed harmless?

comment:7 follow-up: Changed 5 years ago by jdemeyer

I don't really see the point... In any case, I feel that this is something that upstream should decide.

comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 5 years ago by jhpalmieri

  • Reviewers set to John Palmieri
  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

Replying to jdemeyer:

I don't really see the point...

The point, as I said, is "to let users know that this is indeed harmless". Some people worry when they see messages saying that something "failed".

comment:9 Changed 5 years ago by vbraun

  • Branch changed from u/jdemeyer/rebuild_doc_when_sphinx_is_reinstalled to 150baf55e4380b63b57fe998877cd5ce70a40bdb
  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from positive_review to closed

comment:10 Changed 5 years ago by jdemeyer

  • Commit 150baf55e4380b63b57fe998877cd5ce70a40bdb deleted
  • Report Upstream changed from N/A to Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.