#23505 closed enhancement (fixed)
Lattice precision for padics
Reported by:  caruso  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage8.1 
Component:  padics  Keywords:  sd87 
Cc:  roed, TristanVaccon, saraedum, mmezzarobba, swewers  Merged in:  
Authors:  Xavier Caruso  Reviewers:  David Roe, Julian Rüth 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  f29502e (Commits)  Commit:  
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description (last modified by )
In several recent papers, David Roe, Tristan Vaccon and I explain that lattices allow a sharp track of precision: if f is a function we want to evaluate and x is an input given with some uncertainty modeled by a lattice H, then the uncertainty on the output f(x) is exactly df_x(H).
For much more details, I refer to my lecture notes http://xavier.toonywood.org/papers/publis/coursepadic.pdf
The aim of this ticket is to propose a rough implementation of these ideas.
You can play with the latest version of this by clicking on launch binder here.
Below is a small demo (extracted from the doctest).
Below is a small demo of the features by this model of precision: sage: R = ZpLP(3, print_mode='terse') sage: x = R(1,10) Of course, when we multiply by 3, we gain one digit of absolute precision: sage: 3*x 3 + O(3^11) The lattice precision machinery sees this even if we decompose the computation into several steps: sage: y = x+x sage: y 2 + O(3^10) sage: x + y 3 + O(3^11) The same works for the multiplication: sage: z = x^2 sage: z 1 + O(3^10) sage: x*z 1 + O(3^11) This comes more funny when we are working with elements given at different precisions: sage: R = ZpLP(2, print_mode='terse') sage: x = R(1,10) sage: y = R(1,5) sage: z = x+y; z 2 + O(2^5) sage: t = xy; t 0 + O(2^5) sage: z+t # observe that z+t = 2*x 2 + O(2^11) sage: zt # observe that zt = 2*y 2 + O(2^6) sage: x = R(28888,15) sage: y = R(204,10) sage: z = x/y; z 242 + O(2^9) sage: z*y # which is x 28888 + O(2^15) The SOMOS sequence is the sequence defined by the recurrence: ..MATH:: u_n = rac {u_{n1} u_{n3} + u_{n2}^2} {u_{n4}} It is known for its numerical instability. On the one hand, one can show that if the initial values are invertible in mathbb{Z}_p and known at precision O(p^N) then all the next terms of the SOMOS sequence will be known at the same precision as well. On the other hand, because of the division, when we unroll the recurrence, we loose a lot of precision. Observe: sage: R = Zp(2, 30, print_mode='terse') sage: a,b,c,d = R(1,15), R(1,15), R(1,15), R(3,15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 4 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 13 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 55 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 21975 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 6639 + O(2^13) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 7186 + O(2^13) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 569 + O(2^13) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 253 + O(2^13) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 4149 + O(2^13) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 2899 + O(2^12) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 3072 + O(2^12) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 349 + O(2^12) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 619 + O(2^12) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 243 + O(2^12) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 3 + O(2^2) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 2 + O(2^2) If instead, we use the lattice precision, everything goes well: sage: R = ZpLP(2, 30, print_mode='terse') sage: a,b,c,d = R(1,15), R(1,15), R(1,15), R(3,15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 4 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 13 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 55 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 21975 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 23023 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 31762 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 16953 + O(2^15) sage: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a; print d 16637 + O(2^15) sage: for _ in range(100): ....: a,b,c,d = b,c,d,(b*d+c*c)/a sage: a 15519 + O(2^15) sage: b 32042 + O(2^15) sage: c 17769 + O(2^15) sage: d 20949 + O(2^15) BEHIND THE SCENE: The precision is global. It is encoded by a lattice in a huge vector space whose dimension is the number of elements having this parent. Concretely, this precision datum is an instance of the class "sage.rings.padic.lattice_precision.PrecisionLattice". It is attached to the parent and is created at the same time as the parent. (It is actually a bit more subtle because two different parents may share the same instance; this happens for instance for a padic ring and its field of fractions.) This precision datum is accessible through the method "precision()": sage: R = ZpLP(5, print_mode='terse') sage: prec = R.precision() sage: prec Precision Lattice on 0 object This instance knows about all elements of the parent, it is automatically updated when a new element (of this parent) is created: sage: x = R(3513,10) sage: prec Precision Lattice on 1 object sage: y = R(176,5) sage: prec Precision Lattice on 2 objects sage: z = R.random_element() sage: prec Precision Lattice on 3 objects The method "tracked_elements()" provides the list of all tracked elements: sage: prec.tracked_elements() [3513 + O(5^10), 176 + O(5^5), ...] Similarly, when a variable is collected by the garbage collector, the precision lattice is updated. Note however that the update might be delayed. We can force it with the method "del_elements()": sage: z = 0 sage: prec Precision Lattice on 3 objects sage: prec.del_elements() sage: prec Precision Lattice on 2 objects The method "precision_lattice()" returns (a matrix defining) the lattice that models the precision. Here we have: sage: prec.precision_lattice() [9765625 0] [ 0 3125] Observe that 5^10 = 9765625 and 5^5 = 3125. The above matrix then reflects the precision on x and y. Now, observe how the precision lattice changes while performing computations: sage: x, y = 3*x+2*y, 2*(xy) sage: prec.del_elements() sage: prec.precision_lattice() [ 3125 48825000] [ 0 48828125] The matrix we get is no longer diagonal, meaning that some digits of precision are diffused among the two new elements x and y. They nevertheless show up when we compute for instance x+y: sage: x 1516 + O(5^5) sage: y 424 + O(5^5) sage: x+y 17565 + O(5^11) It is these diffused digits of precision (which are tracked but do not appear on the printing) that allow to be always sharp on precision. PERFORMANCES: Each elementary operation requires significant manipulations on the lattice precision and then is costly. Precisely: * The creation of a new element has a cost O(n) when n is the number of tracked elements. * The destruction of one element has a cost O(m^2) when m is the distance between the destroyed element and the last one. Fortunately, it seems that m tends to be small in general (the dynamics of the list of tracked elements is rather close to that of a stack). It is nevertheless still possible to manipulate several hundred variables (e.g. squares matrices of size 5 or polynomials of degree 20 are accessible). The class "PrecisionLattice" provides several features for introspection (especially concerning timings). If enables, it maintains an history of all actions and stores the wall time of each of them: sage: R = ZpLP(3) sage: prec = R.precision() sage: prec.history_enable() sage: M = random_matrix(R, 5) sage: d = M.determinant() sage: print prec.history() # somewhat random  0.004212s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000003s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~ 0.000010s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.001560s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000004s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~oooo~oooo~o 0.002168s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.001787s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000004s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~o 0.000198s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.001152s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000005s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~oooo~~o 0.000853s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000610s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ... 0.003879s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000006s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~~~~ 0.000036s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.006737s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000005s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~~~~ooooo 0.002637s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.007118s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000008s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~~~o~~~~oooo 0.003504s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.005371s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000006s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~~o~~~ooo 0.001858s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.003584s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000004s oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~o~~oo 0.000801s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.001916s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000022s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooo~o~o 0.014705s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.001292s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 0.000002s ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~o The symbol o symbolized a tracked element. The symbol ~ means that the element is marked for deletion. The global timings are also accessible as follows: sage: prec.timings() # somewhat random {'add': 0.25049376487731934, 'del': 0.11911273002624512, 'mark': 0.0004909038543701172, 'partial reduce': 0.0917658805847168}
Change History (73)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by
 Branch set to u/caruso/lattice_precision
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit set to b46b474adaa8d0f54a2bfa039939e9185ee79b4e
 Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from b46b474adaa8d0f54a2bfa039939e9185ee79b4e to 4b2af06c55734697998f25742eea3659334144ae
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
4b2af06  First moreorless working implementation

comment:4 Changed 23 months ago by
 Cc saraedum added
comment:5 Changed 23 months ago by
 Cc mmezzarobba added
 Type changed from task to enhancement
I've worked more on my implementation and, at least, it seems now to be usable.
It still requires a lot of work (convert to Cython, write templates, write doctests, rewrite completely the class pRational
which is a hack, etc). I however post it because I think that some people might have fun playing with it and discovering what lattice precision can do. Enjoy :)
@mmezzarobba: I add your name in Cc because I think that you could be interested. If you're not, feel free to remove it.
comment:6 Changed 23 months ago by
 Commit changed from 4b2af06c55734697998f25742eea3659334144ae to 858492b4b0cd87dfb63fba0f3ad239801b98cb62
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
858492b  Second rough implementation of lattice precision

comment:7 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:8 Changed 23 months ago by
 Commit changed from 858492b4b0cd87dfb63fba0f3ad239801b98cb62 to 399e9534e8ac77a43688fd58242c48297f927890
comment:9 Changed 23 months ago by
 Commit changed from 399e9534e8ac77a43688fd58242c48297f927890 to 1951205a93d24cf59df6ce9ed4b9095efa5db5c0
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
1951205  Fix convert_multiple

comment:10 Changed 23 months ago by
 Cc swewers added
comment:11 Changed 23 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/caruso/lattice_precision to u/roed/lattice_precision
comment:12 Changed 22 months ago by
 Commit changed from 1951205a93d24cf59df6ce9ed4b9095efa5db5c0 to 90a79f74235c9136d6266d221a53f95f91aa7795
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
90a79f7  Merge branch 'u/roed/lattice_precision' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23505/lattice_precision

comment:13 Changed 22 months ago by
 Commit changed from 90a79f74235c9136d6266d221a53f95f91aa7795 to aa8ae62fe8406d2d83bc458d5b1753efdd031571
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
aa8ae62  Fix small problem in QpLP in factory

comment:14 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from aa8ae62fe8406d2d83bc458d5b1753efdd031571 to 0bf65f1b9df6771b3567b2b23d9cd87028dc2d82
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
0bf65f1  Merge branch 'u/roed/lattice_precision' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23505/lattice_precision

comment:15 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/roed/lattice_precision to u/caruso/lattice_precision
comment:16 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from 0bf65f1b9df6771b3567b2b23d9cd87028dc2d82 to 62c5d561fb0738e209e9f7372405d047e066f0a0
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
62c5d56  Some doctests in lattice_precision.py

comment:17 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from 62c5d561fb0738e209e9f7372405d047e066f0a0 to f06603b350f2e3daedaf742f438db206b14e162f
comment:18 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from f06603b350f2e3daedaf742f438db206b14e162f to 5ef1735186f642f81c8a335f07b3f6f05b0a2821
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
5ef1735  Doctest in padic_lattice_element.py

comment:19 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/caruso/lattice_precision to u/roed/lattice_precision
comment:20 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/roed/lattice_precision to u/caruso/lattice_precision
comment:21 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from 5ef1735186f642f81c8a335f07b3f6f05b0a2821 to e9bb90bb49c864e679f9252ab940d95d4cbebaa4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e9bb90b  ZpLP > ZpLC

comment:22 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from e9bb90bb49c864e679f9252ab940d95d4cbebaa4 to 087eb33b54b9634dcf193cb0e6179e782005c1dd
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
087eb33  Fix small bug

comment:23 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from 087eb33b54b9634dcf193cb0e6179e782005c1dd to 8d68a69e4b2e0a562c991e0e7be80a70d74193b6
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
8d68a69  Implementation of ZpLF

comment:24 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from 8d68a69e4b2e0a562c991e0e7be80a70d74193b6 to 7bb677c87e77d031a69b8e437c05417cd80b4557
comment:25 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7bb677c87e77d031a69b8e437c05417cd80b4557 to 63eee81fd570b4bccc229cc9a8096662e4d3a9ea
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
63eee81  Merge branch 'develop' into lattice_precision

comment:26 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from 63eee81fd570b4bccc229cc9a8096662e4d3a9ea to c04c37021a9de330f88c8c0c7d6d1012c6561a3f
comment:27 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from c04c37021a9de330f88c8c0c7d6d1012c6561a3f to c26c01e58b3978ac2b69c055f7c85c5b149411aa
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c26c01e  Fix bug in is_precision_capped

comment:28 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from c26c01e58b3978ac2b69c055f7c85c5b149411aa to 9780da5204bad7c32b559f112a0fafd809890b5d
comment:29 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from new to needs_review
I guess that this ticket is now more or less ready for a first review.
comment:30 Changed 16 months ago by
I would be happy to help with reviewing this. Since this is quite a lot of code, would you mind to push the code to github/gitlab where it is much easier to comment on lines of code? I can also push it to a repository there myself if you don't mind.
comment:31 Changed 16 months ago by
Do you document somewhere why this does not follow the usual linkage pattern used elsewhere in the padics code?
comment:32 Changed 16 months ago by
Replying to saraedum:
Do you document somewhere why this does not follow the usual linkage pattern used elsewhere in the padics code?
I think the main answer is that it just hasn't been switched to the linkage pattern, but it should be. The pRational will take some work to make this happen. I'll be busy in the next few weeks working on an ANTS paper, but we can talk about this in Rennes. In the mean time, I think if you want to push the code to github/gitlab that should be fine.
comment:33 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/caruso/lattice_precision to u/saraedum/lattice_precision
comment:34 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from 9780da5204bad7c32b559f112a0fafd809890b5d to 241bd7ac2d4dbdc5765ef2222e46a7be7f2817a2
I pushed Xavier's code to https://gitlab.com/saraedum/sage/merge_requests/1/diffs for easier review.
New commits:
241bd7a  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/develop' into t/23505/lattice_precision

comment:35 Changed 16 months ago by
see patchbot report for several issues (including important python3 compatibility)
comment:36 followup: ↓ 38 Changed 16 months ago by
I'm getting a maximum recursion depth exceeded:
sage: Q2 = QpLC(2,print_mode='digits') sage: R.<x,y,z> = PolynomialRing(Q2, order = 'invlex') sage: F = [ Q2(2,10)*x + Q2(1,10)*z, ....: Q2(1,10)*x^2 + Q2(1,10)*y^2  Q2(2,10)*z^2, ....: Q2(4,10)*y^2 + Q2(1,10)*y*z + Q2(8,10)*z^2 ] sage: from sage.rings.polynomial.toy_buchberger import buchberger_improved sage: g = buchberger_improved(ideal(F)); sage: g.sort() sage: L.number_of_diffused_digits([g[1].coefficient(x^2), ....: g[2].coefficient(x^2),g[3].coefficient(x)]) /home/user/sage8.1/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/rings/padics/lattice_precision.pyc in number_of_diffused_digits(self, elements) 563 17 564 """ > 565 M = self.precision_lattice(elements) 566 n = M.nrows() 567 if M.ncols() > n: /home/user/sage8.1/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/rings/padics/lattice_precision.pyc in precision_lattice(self, elements) 1551 elements = self._elements 1552 else: > 1553 elements = list_of_padics(elements) 1554 n = len(self._elements) 1555 rows = [ ]; val = 0 /home/user/sage8.1/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/rings/padics/lattice_precision.pyc in list_of_padics(elements) 234 ans = [ ] 235 for x in elements: > 236 ans += list_of_padics(x) 237 return ans 238
comment:37 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/lattice_precision to u/caruso/lattice_precision
comment:38 in reply to: ↑ 36 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/caruso/lattice_precision to u/saraedum/lattice_precision
Replying to roed:
I'm getting a maximum recursion depth exceeded:
The reason is that (1) coefficient
returns a multivariate polynomial and (2) if P is a multivariate polynomial, list(P)
contains some multivariate polynomials in it as well.
The last commit fixes the bug. But I'm not sure that it's the correct way to do this.
sage: Q2 = QpLC(2,print_mode='digits') sage: L = Q2.precision() sage: R.<x,y,z> = PolynomialRing(Q2, order = 'invlex') sage: F = [ Q2(2,10)*x + Q2(1,10)*z, ....: Q2(1,10)*x^2 + Q2(1,10)*y^2  Q2(2,10)*z^2, ....: Q2(4,10)*y^2 + Q2(1,10)*y*z + Q2(8,10)*z^2 ] sage: from sage.rings.polynomial.toy_buchberger import buchberger_improved sage: g = buchberger_improved(ideal(F)); sage: g.sort() sage: L.number_of_diffused_digits([g[1].coefficient(x^2), g[2].coefficient(x^2), g[3].coefficient(x)]) 0
comment:39 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/lattice_precision to u/caruso/lattice_precision
 Commit changed from 241bd7ac2d4dbdc5765ef2222e46a7be7f2817a2 to 2a948350e06b82fd27e913aec3cb72c48158c4e0
comment:40 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
You need to fix all the patchbot's warnings, including the incompatibilities with python3.
comment:41 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2a948350e06b82fd27e913aec3cb72c48158c4e0 to 2c334e73a7f0aca094a82d3591164404ee5be30d
comment:42 Changed 16 months ago by
@caruso: I merged your commits into the repository on gitlab. (I had sent you the instructions on how to push to gitlab several times on zulip but apparently zulip has silently not been working for quite a while…so, to push your changes there in the future: git fetch git@gitlab.com:saraedum/sage.git t/23505/lattice_precision && git merge FETCH_HEAD && git push git@gitlab.com:saraedum/sage.git HEAD:t/23505/lattice_precision
. There are also more convenient commands for this, I can show you later.)
comment:43 Changed 16 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:44 Changed 16 months ago by
 Work issues set to mark all the public interfaces as @experimental
comment:45 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2c334e73a7f0aca094a82d3591164404ee5be30d to 63245c8795b88c570d43f952693b10248e711bc9
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
90efc9f  Merge branch 'ci' into t/23505/lattice_precision

1bcb818  Merge branch 'ci' into binder

cd951b8  Allow overriding of ARTIFACT_BASE

843ba5a  Merge branch 'ci' into binder

cdf5cf0  Merge branch 'binder' into t/23505/lattice_precision

1c6c836  Elaborate on reechelonization

347911b  Minor cleanup in initialization

8108284  minor docstring cleanup

52bc76f  Rename new_element to _new_element

63245c8  Merge branch 't/23505/lattice_precision' of gitlab.com:saraedum/sage into lattice_precision

comment:46 Changed 16 months ago by
IMHO, not a good idea at all to merge the "binder" branch with this ticket. The patchbots will not longer look at it, because it is now unsafe.
comment:47 Changed 16 months ago by
I agree, I merged them accidentally. I will remove them later. For now, the ticket is not quite ready for review; I just wanted to check whether the patchbot is happy with my changes.
comment:48 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:49 Changed 16 months ago by
As I said, as long as the branch is messed up, patchbots will refuse to run..
comment:50 Changed 16 months ago by
@chapoton: Thanks for clarifying how the patchbots work here. We'll take the binder out at the end and squash the other commits. We use the CI integration because we are developing this on GitLab? and also because we wanted to see a sandbox environment to play with this.
@caruso: I'll run doctests on GitLab?, they should be available in a couple of hours.
comment:51 Changed 16 months ago by
Ok. Thanks to both of you!
comment:52 Changed 16 months ago by
 Work issues changed from mark all the public interfaces as @experimental to mark all the public interfaces as @experimental, disable pickling
comment:53 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/caruso/lattice_precision to u/saraedum/lattice_precision
comment:54 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from 63245c8795b88c570d43f952693b10248e711bc9 to b2b82e87e40f69b4f211598e82f6de2f647df9d7
 Work issues mark all the public interfaces as @experimental, disable pickling deleted
New commits:
b2b82e8  Lattice precision for padics

comment:55 Changed 16 months ago by
 Reviewers set to David Roe, Julian Rüth
comment:56 followup: ↓ 57 Changed 16 months ago by
This has a positive review, once https://gitlab.com/saraedum/sage//jobs/55854321 has completed without errors.
comment:57 in reply to: ↑ 56 Changed 16 months ago by
Replying to saraedum:
This has a positive review, once https://gitlab.com/saraedum/sage//jobs/55854321 has completed without errors.
Job's log exceeded limit of 4194304 bytes.
comment:58 followup: ↓ 62 Changed 16 months ago by
sage t long src/sage/interacts/test_jupyter.rst ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/interacts/test_jupyter.rst", line 288, in sage.interacts.test_jupyter Failed example: test(interacts.statistics.coin) Expected: Interactive function <function coin at ...> with 2 widgets n: IntSlider(value=1000, description=u'Number of Tosses', max=10000, min=2, step=100) interval: IntRangeSlider(value=(0, 0), description=u'Plotting range (y)', max=1) doctest:...: UserWarning: Attempting to set identical bottom==top results in singular transformations; automatically expanding. bottom=0.0, top=0.0 Got: doctest:... UserWarning: Attempting to set identical bottom==top results in singular transformations; automatically expanding. bottom=0.0, top=0.0 Interactive function <function coin at 0x7fb48b00d7d0> with 2 widgets n: IntSlider(value=1000, description=u'Number of Tosses', max=10000, min=2, step=100) interval: IntRangeSlider(value=(0, 0), description=u'Plotting range (y)', max=1)
Should we fix this?
comment:59 Changed 16 months ago by
patchbot here is still not 100% happy
comment:60 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/lattice_precision to u/caruso/lattice_precision
comment:61 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from b2b82e87e40f69b4f211598e82f6de2f647df9d7 to f29502ee1739ae2013f273ffae063cb0820b5fbc
I fixed some failures but I think that this ticket is not responsible for the doctest failure in interacts/test_jupyter.rst
. What should I do with it?
New commits:
f29502e  Fix doctest

comment:62 in reply to: ↑ 58 Changed 16 months ago by
I am not sure what this is about. I don't think that's a problem coming from the changes here, so we should not fix it here.
Replying to caruso:
sage t long src/sage/interacts/test_jupyter.rst ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/interacts/test_jupyter.rst", line 288, in sage.interacts.test_jupyter Failed example: test(interacts.statistics.coin) Expected: Interactive function <function coin at ...> with 2 widgets n: IntSlider(value=1000, description=u'Number of Tosses', max=10000, min=2, step=100) interval: IntRangeSlider(value=(0, 0), description=u'Plotting range (y)', max=1) doctest:...: UserWarning: Attempting to set identical bottom==top results in singular transformations; automatically expanding. bottom=0.0, top=0.0 Got: doctest:... UserWarning: Attempting to set identical bottom==top results in singular transformations; automatically expanding. bottom=0.0, top=0.0 Interactive function <function coin at 0x7fb48b00d7d0> with 2 widgets n: IntSlider(value=1000, description=u'Number of Tosses', max=10000, min=2, step=100) interval: IntRangeSlider(value=(0, 0), description=u'Plotting range (y)', max=1)Should we fix this?
comment:63 Changed 16 months ago by
So now, only the failure in interacts/test_jupyter.rst
remains...
comment:64 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
The PDF reference manual builds. The German "A Tour of Sage" fails to build but I can't imagine that this ticket is responsible for this:
[a_tour_of] loading translations [de]... done [a_tour_of] Compiling the master document [a_tour_of] building [mo]: targets for 0 po files that are out of date [a_tour_of] building [latex]: all documents [a_tour_of] Merging environment/index files... [a_tour_of] ... done (0 todos, 1 index, 0 citations, 0 modules) [a_tour_of] Saved pickle file: citations.pickle [a_tour_of] processing a_tour_of_sage.tex...index [a_tour_of] resolving references... [a_tour_of] writing... done [a_tour_of] copying images... [ 50%] sin_plot.png [a_tour_of] copying images... [100%] eigen_plot.png [a_tour_of] copying TeX support files... [a_tour_of] done [a_tour_of] build succeeded. latexmk pdf dvi ps 'a_tour_of_sage.tex' Latexmk: applying rule 'pdflatex'... This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592652.61.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex) restricted \write18 enabled. entering extended mode (./a_tour_of_sage.tex LaTeX2e <2016/02/01> Babel <3.9q> and hyphenation patterns for 3 language(s) loaded. (./sphinxmanual.cls Document Class: sphinxmanual 2017/03/26 v1.6 Document class (Sphinx manual) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/report.cls Document Class: report 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo))) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/utf8.def (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/t1enc.dfu) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/ot1enc.dfu) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/omsenc.dfu))) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/cmap/cmap.sty) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)<<t1.cmap>>) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsmath.sty For additional information on amsmath, use the `?' option. (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsmath/amstext.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsgen.sty)) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsbsy.sty) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsmath/amsopn.sty)) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsfonts/amssymb.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/latex/amsfonts/amsfonts.sty)) (/usr/share/texlive/texmfdist/tex/generic/babel/babel.sty ! Package babel Error: You haven't specified a language option. See the babel package documentation for explanation. Type H <return> for immediate help. ... l.343 ...ry to proceed from here, type x to quit.} ? ! Emergency stop. ... l.343 ...ry to proceed from here, type x to quit.} ! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! Transcript written on a_tour_of_sage.log. Latexmk: Errors, so I did not complete making targets Makefile:33: recipe for target 'a_tour_of_sage.pdf' failed
comment:65 Changed 16 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/caruso/lattice_precision to f29502ee1739ae2013f273ffae063cb0820b5fbc
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:66 followup: ↓ 68 Changed 14 months ago by
 Commit f29502ee1739ae2013f273ffae063cb0820b5fbc deleted
There are issues with python3 division in lattice_precision:
source ./local/bin/sageenv python Qnew ./local/bin/sageruntests src/sage/rings/padics
reports many failing doctests. This can be seen also when adding
from __future__ import division
in the file.
comment:67 Changed 14 months ago by
and you also introduced some "has_key", so please review #25280
comment:68 in reply to: ↑ 66 Changed 14 months ago by
Replying to chapoton:
There are issues with python3 division in lattice_precision:
source ./local/bin/sageenv python Qnew ./local/bin/sageruntests src/sage/rings/padicsreports many failing doctests. This can be seen also when adding
from __future__ import divisionin the file.
Adding the line:
__truediv__ = __div__
in the defintion of the class pRational
resolves this issue. Is it the right way to fix this or should I do something else?
comment:69 Changed 13 months ago by
code from this ticket seems to trigger TimeOut
errors on several machines running sage 8.3.b0, please investigate !
comment:70 Changed 13 months ago by
Thanks for pointing this out. I created a followup #25431.
comment:71 Changed 8 months ago by
The file padic_lattice_element.py
is now one of the last 3 files (see #26212) having more than 100 failing doctests in python3:
sage t long src/sage/rings/padics/padic_lattice_element.py # 167 doctests failed
It would be appreciated if the authors of this code could handle the task of making all this compatible with python3.
comment:72 Changed 8 months ago by
I'll take a look. I've opened #26576.
comment:73 Changed 8 months ago by
I'd be happy to contribute as well but I don't know so much about Python3 (which explains why this ticket has so many failures...)
In particular, what should I do if I want to run doctests with the python3 interpretor. Do I need to install a new copy of sage compiled with python3 or is there something more clever?
New commits:
Pseudocode for lattice precision