Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#22995 closed enhancement (fixed)

Dummy inverse Laplace for giac

Reported by: mforets Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: sage-8.0
Component: calculus Keywords: calculus
Cc: rws Merged in:
Authors: Marcelo Forets Reviewers: Frédéric Chapoton
Report Upstream: N/A Work issues:
Branch: 75e1b24 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab) Commit: 75e1b247b02448b1fc14b34396feb35b58e7cf6c
Dependencies: #22833 Stopgaps:

Status badges


If inverse_laplace(..., algorithm='giac') does not find a solution, Sage should return a formal function.

Change History (7)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by mforets

  • Authors set to Marcelo Forets
  • Branch set to u/mforets/22995
  • Commit set to e7f82ed1ce530ac37aaec7b645bf8328fd31f066
  • Merged in set to #22833
  • Status changed from new to needs_review

New commits:

e2d74c6parse unevaluated expression in EN and FR
eb162f5standarization of SEEALSO blocks
e7f82edadd dummy ilaplace

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by tscrim

  • Cc rws added
  • Dependencies set to #22833
  • Merged in #22833 deleted

comment:3 follow-up: Changed 5 years ago by chapoton

missing backtick

+        :func:`laplace

comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by git

  • Commit changed from e7f82ed1ce530ac37aaec7b645bf8328fd31f066 to 75e1b247b02448b1fc14b34396feb35b58e7cf6c

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

c1b5cddfix missing backtick
a892045Merge branch 'develop' into t/mforets/22995
75e1b24fix unnecessary :: thing

comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 3 Changed 5 years ago by mforets

Replying to chapoton:

missing backtick

+        :func:`laplace

fixed, thanks.

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by chapoton

  • Reviewers set to Frédéric Chapoton
  • Status changed from needs_review to positive_review

ok, let it be

comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by vbraun

  • Branch changed from u/mforets/22995 to 75e1b247b02448b1fc14b34396feb35b58e7cf6c
  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.