Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 22 months ago
#22873 new defect
No evaluation with gamma of ball/interval field arguments
Reported by: | rws | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-8.2 |
Component: | symbolics | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Merged in: | ||
Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
Incomplete gamma doesn't do anything given ball arguments
sage: gamma(2, RBF(1/3)) gamma(2, [0.3333333333333333 +/- 7.04e-17]) sage: gamma(2., RBF(1/3)) gamma(2.00000000000000, [0.3333333333333333 +/- 7.04e-17]) sage: gamma(2, RIF(1/3)) gamma(2, 0.3333333333333334?)
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by
- Branch set to u/rws/no_evaluation_with_gamma_of_ball_arguments
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
- Commit set to 270ade9eb48bfc0fad793e34c0d0ea2b1dc2dad2
- Description modified (diff)
- Milestone changed from sage-8.0 to sage-8.2
- Summary changed from No evaluation with gamma of ball arguments to No evaluation with gamma of ball/interval field arguments
comment:3 Changed 22 months ago by
It's not use making a GinacFunction
out of this so a Python solution should do.
comment:4 Changed 22 months ago by
- Branch u/rws/no_evaluation_with_gamma_of_ball_arguments deleted
- Commit 270ade9eb48bfc0fad793e34c0d0ea2b1dc2dad2 deleted
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
New commits:
22873: first attempt