#21869 closed enhancement (fixed)
A framework for discrete valuations in Sage
Reported by:  saraedum  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage7.5 
Component:  commutative algebra  Keywords:  discrete valuations, valuations, padics, function fields, number fields, smooth projective curves, Mac Lane algorithm, Montes algorithm, sd87 
Cc:  Merged in:  
Authors:  Julian Rüth  Reviewers:  GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers, David Roe, Padmavathi Srinivasan, Shiva Chidambaram 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  24807e3 (Commits)  Commit:  
Dependencies:  #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620, #23642, #23965, #23966  Stopgaps: 
Description (last modified by )
Based on the sage package https://github.com/mclf/mac_lane.
Change History (309)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:7 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:8 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:9 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:10 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:11 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:12 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:13 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:14 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:15 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:16 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:17 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:18 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:19 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:20 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:21 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:22 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:23 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:24 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:25 Changed 23 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:26 Changed 22 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:27 Changed 21 months ago by
 Branch set to u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:28 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit set to 0f615c771cac39a2cce4d54b4fd190f1c84992de
 Keywords sd87 added
comment:29 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 0f615c771cac39a2cce4d54b4fd190f1c84992de to 4153ef9b3a920d079437825960d904205fc2ae53
comment:30 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 4153ef9b3a920d079437825960d904205fc2ae53 to c0a81c8285b47f6fc89aa34bc125ac474c75f2e9
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c0a81c8  fix function lookup

comment:31 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
New commits:
c0a81c8  fix function lookup

comment:32 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues set to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits
comment:33 Changed 21 months ago by
 Status changed from new to needs_review
comment:34 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:35 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:36 followup: ↓ 38 Changed 21 months ago by
I was reviewing gauss_valuation.py and tried reducing a polynomial using the Gauss valuation induced by the 2adic valuation, and got an unexpected error message. I thought it would tell me that the polynomial wasn't integral, and instead it gave me a coercion error.
sage: v Gauss valuation induced by 2adic valuation sage: v.domain() Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Integer Ring sage: h 1/2*y^2 sage: v.reduce(h)  TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput1084d78566b468b> in <module>() > 1 v.reduce(h) /projects/da1818ed996d4de6acc6361415b7725d/user/padma_sk/mac_lane/gauss_valuation.py in reduce(self, f, check, degree_bound, coefficients, valuations) 360 361 """ > 362 f = self.domain().coerce(f) 363 364 if degree_bound is not None: /usr/local/sage/src/sage/structure/parent.pyx in sage.structure.parent.Parent.coerce (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/structure/parent.c:11229)() 1166 return False 1167 > 1168 cpdef coerce(self, x): 1169 """ 1170 Return x as an element of self, if and only if there is a canonical /usr/local/sage/src/sage/structure/parent.pyx in sage.structure.parent.Parent.coerce (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/structure/parent.c:11158)() 1193 except Exception: 1194 _record_exception() > 1195 raise TypeError("no canonical coercion from %s to %s" % (parent(x), self)) 1196 else: 1197 return (<map.Map>mor)._call_(x) TypeError: no canonical coercion from Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Rational Field to Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Integer Ring
comment:37 followup: ↓ 39 Changed 21 months ago by
equivalence_unit from gauss_valuation.py isn't outputting the results shown in the example input 2 as shown in the file.
sage: v Gauss valuation induced by 2adic valuation sage: v.domain() Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Integer Ring sage: v.equivalence_unit(2) 4 sage: v.equivalence_unit(2)  ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput12871aadb857663> in <module>() > 1 v.equivalence_unit(Integer(2)) /usr/local/sage/src/sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:1079 2)() 2036 return cache[k] 2037 except KeyError: > 2038 w = self._instance_call(*args, **kwds) 2039 cache[k] = w 2040 return w /usr/local/sage/src/sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller._instance_call (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc. c:10238)() 1912 True 1913 """ > 1914 return self.f(self._instance, *args, **kwds) 1915 1916 cdef fix_args_kwds(self, tuple args, dict kwds): /projects/da1818ed996d4de6acc6361415b7725d/user/padma_sk/mac_lane/gauss_valuation.py in equivalence_unit(self, s, reciprocal) 474 return self.equivalence_reciprocal(self.equivalence_unit(s)) 475 > 476 ret = self._base_valuation.element_with_valuation(s) 477 return self.domain()(ret) 478 /projects/da1818ed996d4de6acc6361415b7725d/user/padma_sk/mac_lane/valuation_space.py in element_with_valuation(self, s) 465 s = QQ.coerce(s) 466 if s not in self.value_semigroup(): > 467 raise ValueError("s must be in the value semigroup of this valuation but %r is not in %r"%(s, self.value_semigroup())) 468 if s == 0: 469 return self.domain().one() ValueError: s must be in the value semigroup of this valuation but 2 is not in Additive Abelian Semigroup generated by 1
comment:38 in reply to: ↑ 36 Changed 21 months ago by
Thanks for reporting this. I think this is ok. The problem here is not that the polynomial is not integral but that the polynomial is not in the domain.
This works:
sage: R.<x> = QQ[] sage: v = valuations.GaussValuation(R, QQ.valuation(2)) sage: v.reduce(x + 1/2) ValueError: reduction not defined for nonintegral elements and x + 1/2 is not integral over Gauss valuation induced by 2adic valuation
This does not:
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[] sage: v = valuations.GaussValuation(R, ZZ.valuation(2)) sage: v.reduce(x + 1/2) TypeError: no canonical coercion from Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Rational Field to Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
Replying to padma_sk:
I was reviewing gauss_valuation.py and tried reducing a polynomial using the Gauss valuation induced by the 2adic valuation, and got an unexpected error message. I thought it would tell me that the polynomial wasn't integral, and instead it gave me a coercion error.
sage: v Gauss valuation induced by 2adic valuation sage: v.domain() Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Integer Ring sage: h 1/2*y^2 sage: v.reduce(h)  TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput1084d78566b468b> in <module>() > 1 v.reduce(h) /projects/da1818ed996d4de6acc6361415b7725d/user/padma_sk/mac_lane/gauss_valuation.py in reduce(self, f, check, degree_bound, coefficients, valuations) 360 361 """ > 362 f = self.domain().coerce(f) 363 364 if degree_bound is not None: /usr/local/sage/src/sage/structure/parent.pyx in sage.structure.parent.Parent.coerce (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/structure/parent.c:11229)() 1166 return False 1167 > 1168 cpdef coerce(self, x): 1169 """ 1170 Return x as an element of self, if and only if there is a canonical /usr/local/sage/src/sage/structure/parent.pyx in sage.structure.parent.Parent.coerce (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/structure/parent.c:11158)() 1193 except Exception: 1194 _record_exception() > 1195 raise TypeError("no canonical coercion from %s to %s" % (parent(x), self)) 1196 else: 1197 return (<map.Map>mor)._call_(x) TypeError: no canonical coercion from Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Rational Field to Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Integer Ring
comment:39 in reply to: ↑ 37 Changed 21 months ago by
You are in the wrong domain in this example I think:
This is the error you are seeing because there is no element of valuation 2 in ZZ[x]
.
sage: R.<x> = ZZ[] sage: v = valuations.GaussValuation(R, ZZ.valuation(2)) sage: v.element_with_valuation(2) ValueError: s must be in the value semigroup of this valuation but 2 is not in Additive Abelian Semigroup generated by 1
However, this works in QQ[x]
.
sage: sage: R.<x> = QQ[] sage: v = valuations.GaussValuation(R, QQ.valuation(2)) sage: v.element_with_valuation(2) 1/4
Does that make sense? (Should it be documented more explicitly?)
Replying to padma_sk:
equivalence_unit from gauss_valuation.py isn't outputting the results shown in the example input 2 as shown in the file.
sage: v Gauss valuation induced by 2adic valuation sage: v.domain() Univariate Polynomial Ring in y over Integer Ring sage: v.equivalence_unit(2) 4 sage: v.equivalence_unit(2)  ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipythoninput12871aadb857663> in <module>() > 1 v.equivalence_unit(Integer(2)) /usr/local/sage/src/sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller.__call__ (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc.c:1079 2)() 2036 return cache[k] 2037 except KeyError: > 2038 w = self._instance_call(*args, **kwds) 2039 cache[k] = w 2040 return w /usr/local/sage/src/sage/misc/cachefunc.pyx in sage.misc.cachefunc.CachedMethodCaller._instance_call (/usr/local/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/misc/cachefunc. c:10238)() 1912 True 1913 """ > 1914 return self.f(self._instance, *args, **kwds) 1915 1916 cdef fix_args_kwds(self, tuple args, dict kwds): /projects/da1818ed996d4de6acc6361415b7725d/user/padma_sk/mac_lane/gauss_valuation.py in equivalence_unit(self, s, reciprocal) 474 return self.equivalence_reciprocal(self.equivalence_unit(s)) 475 > 476 ret = self._base_valuation.element_with_valuation(s) 477 return self.domain()(ret) 478 /projects/da1818ed996d4de6acc6361415b7725d/user/padma_sk/mac_lane/valuation_space.py in element_with_valuation(self, s) 465 s = QQ.coerce(s) 466 if s not in self.value_semigroup(): > 467 raise ValueError("s must be in the value semigroup of this valuation but %r is not in %r"%(s, self.value_semigroup())) 468 if s == 0: 469 return self.domain().one() ValueError: s must be in the value semigroup of this valuation but 2 is not in Additive Abelian Semigroup generated by 1
comment:40 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:41 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies set to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996
comment:42 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190
comment:43 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:44 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:45 followup: ↓ 48 Changed 21 months ago by
 Reviewers set to GaYee Park
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Ran the test and found the error:
sage t src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py # 7 doctests failed
comment:46 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:47 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics
comment:48 in reply to: ↑ 45 Changed 21 months ago by
Replying to gpark:
Ran the test and found the error:
sage t src/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py # 7 doctests failed
Did you run the tests with all the dependencies applied? About 50 tests fail for me. That's expected (since the dependencies are not in yet.)
comment:49 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Reviewers changed from GaYee Park to GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers
comment:50 Changed 21 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:51 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:52 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:53 Changed 21 months ago by
The following errors are expected. I am working on them.
 sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/limit_valuation.py # 52 doctests failed sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/gauss_valuation.py # 1 doctest failed sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/valuation_space.py # 2 doctests failed sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/mapped_valuation.py # 42 doctests failed sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/valuation.py # 9 doctests failed sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/inductive_valuation.py # 13 doctests failed sage t warnlong 39.1 src/sage/rings/valuation/augmented_valuation.py # 16 doctests failed 
comment:54 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 135 failing doctests
comment:55 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 135 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics
comment:56 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 135 failing doctests
comment:57 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
Sorry, I somehow reverted some changes to the ticket description. Not sure how this happened.
comment:58 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 135 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 252 failing doctests
comment:59 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:60 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:61 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
I have had a look at function_field_valuation
. I have already worked with the code a lot, and it is working fine, and the documentation is extensive and clear. But I have only tested the latest standalone version.
comment:62 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 252 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 288 failing doctests
comment:63 Changed 21 months ago by
 Reviewers changed from GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers to GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers, David Roe
comment:64 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from c0a81c8285b47f6fc89aa34bc125ac474c75f2e9 to 9fd87332c734899d860972d836d479283b5ab62f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
9fd8733  fix import

comment:65 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 9fd87332c734899d860972d836d479283b5ab62f to e1e65a5d7514ebe51365bdf1da402d2054f02654
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e1e65a5  fixed typo

comment:66 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from e1e65a5d7514ebe51365bdf1da402d2054f02654 to 9c16a1bc642498daaa1c17f61a874cbd42f4063b
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
9c16a1b  undo .valuation() shortcut

comment:67 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 9c16a1bc642498daaa1c17f61a874cbd42f4063b to 119f2454cb4100c62300121a7df024a8b4dead9e
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
119f245  It is not relevant whether a valuation converts into the valuation space but whether it is already in the valuation space

comment:68 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 119f2454cb4100c62300121a7df024a8b4dead9e to 7ea987498d844fb5aa28c4023cc8f4350d48a20a
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7ea9874  fix doctests

comment:69 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 288 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 36 failing doctests
comment:70 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483
comment:71 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7ea987498d844fb5aa28c4023cc8f4350d48a20a to 0c60cb7006afcd336963fdcc7af5cab510cd796b
comment:72 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 0c60cb7006afcd336963fdcc7af5cab510cd796b to 20100145cbdac34f8f3f021f597f750541c60d11
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
2010014  restricting to ZZ, we need to know the prime

comment:73 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 36 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests
comment:74 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 20100145cbdac34f8f3f021f597f750541c60d11 to efe24904ec35606462a941a47fee496ebf463491
comment:75 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495
 Description modified (diff)
 Reviewers changed from GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers, David Roe to GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 252 failing doctests
New commits:
e5ef4d8  do not catch everything

9fd8733  fix import

e1e65a5  fixed typo

9c16a1b  undo .valuation() shortcut

119f245  It is not relevant whether a valuation converts into the valuation space but whether it is already in the valuation space

7ea9874  fix doctests

3fd4140  add doctest output

0c60cb7  fix valuation parameters

2010014  restricting to ZZ, we need to know the prime

efe2490  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:76 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483
 Description modified (diff)
 Reviewers changed from GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers to GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers, David Roe
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 252 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests
Oops. Reverting.
comment:77 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:78 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from efe24904ec35606462a941a47fee496ebf463491 to 0fd986f1773f30ea1f89b01198892fd32c122882
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
1eace28  Update valuation_space.py

21b0f68  Update valuation_space.py

38f3815  Update valuation_space.py

7c57f68  Update valuation_space.py

d90afa8  Update valuation_space.py

1cb8178  Update valuation_space.py

39cb55b  Update valuation_space.py

a474ed5  Update valuation_space.py

ca2089f  Update valuation_space.py

0fd986f  Merge remotetracking branch 'remotes/github/sage' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:79 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:80 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:81 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:82 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:83 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:84 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:85 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?
comment:86 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:87 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:88 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:89 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:90 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism? to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, make sure there are no more optional:integrateds
comment:91 Changed 21 months ago by
 Reviewers changed from GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers, David Roe to GaYee Park, Stefan Wewers, David Roe, Padmavathi Srinivasan, Shiva Chidambaram
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, make sure there are no more optional:integrateds to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?
comment:92 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 0fd986f1773f30ea1f89b01198892fd32c122882 to 33aa99f1aa6c8e4478cd73c1808b3e7918a29402
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
bcb78f3  Update scaled_valuation.py

be4daab  Update valuation.py

7a95a9d  Update augmented_valuation.py

dbf7791  Update augmented_valuation.py

58bb2bc  Update developing_valuation.py

e1c8bd5  Update limit_valuation.py

a0f6bd3  Update mapped_valuation.py

33aa99f  Update padic_valuation.py

comment:93 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 33aa99f1aa6c8e4478cd73c1808b3e7918a29402 to 37d718725faa28404b3db194cc81b9eede19c01e
comment:94 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Type changed from task to enhancement
comment:95 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:96 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 37d718725faa28404b3db194cc81b9eede19c01e to 8da1ceb17a7bbcfbf174cdb754365d3ddca05cc0
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
8da1ceb  Clarify semigroup construction

comment:97 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 8da1ceb17a7bbcfbf174cdb754365d3ddca05cc0 to 07e40b964b4ab3a9f7cdf448bcd5956065fd787f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
07e40b9  add shifting doctest

comment:98 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
New commits:
07e40b9  add shifting doctest

comment:99 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 07e40b964b4ab3a9f7cdf448bcd5956065fd787f to 021b188797aa024ae6f17f4954f679eabcaed5c3
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
021b188  improve error message

comment:100 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 021b188797aa024ae6f17f4954f679eabcaed5c3 to a6a798f9e713f7237e81eea92cdaca9bc455eda3
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a6a798f  Clarified the notion of minimality

comment:101 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from a6a798f9e713f7237e81eea92cdaca9bc455eda3 to ee0db3141cb365e8e7cdf89ec568b3b493a179e9
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
ee0db31  clarify meaning of effective_degree

comment:102 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from ee0db3141cb365e8e7cdf89ec568b3b493a179e9 to e9243b8ea32bdaba2694bc77071b3ee41b7355ce
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e9243b8  bring residue into the right residue ring

comment:103 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from e9243b8ea32bdaba2694bc77071b3ee41b7355ce to 24e68ecc6536c18d63d77d7f56ae4cb27a98ae10
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
24e68ec  add to/from residue ring tests

comment:104 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 24e68ecc6536c18d63d77d7f56ae4cb27a98ae10 to 2bed311a203da9a773b4cefe0bc3c6b5c038394b
comment:105 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2bed311a203da9a773b4cefe0bc3c6b5c038394b to 544977a3161e2f86d1e924b7403fd9709c77620a
comment:106 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 544977a3161e2f86d1e924b7403fd9709c77620a to a0880bd55bb78b4c738917211adf2d0892a33038
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a0880bd  Fix bug in padic shift

comment:107 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from a0880bd55bb78b4c738917211adf2d0892a33038 to e9eddbd7dc92017f1113612dace917d562c55eaf
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e9eddbd  better size estimate for large primes

comment:108 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from e9eddbd7dc92017f1113612dace917d562c55eaf to d0ebc9bc5ba1f1f76476c9cc2c69f39f26a9e1d0
comment:109 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from d0ebc9bc5ba1f1f76476c9cc2c69f39f26a9e1d0 to 7c1bf020ef92e91440d97a3cc5a7354483ef36c0
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7c1bf02  Key has changed

comment:110 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:111 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7c1bf020ef92e91440d97a3cc5a7354483ef36c0 to a93ce9ae2b875091b6e3d3b2079835b69026525f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a93ce9a  Some examples that came up at Sage Days 87

comment:112 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism? to move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation
New commits:
a93ce9a  Some examples that came up at Sage Days 87

comment:113 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from a93ce9ae2b875091b6e3d3b2079835b69026525f to 7bc7f170e970245c65c39e379a84d099234e8c83
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
709e7f6  GaussValuation is available on the global scope

a86ed5e  added introductory examples for developing valuations

f305a7f  Update inductive_valuation.py

b86ddd7  Merge branch 'sage' of github.com:saraedum/mac_lane into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

7bc7f17  Improved intro sections of valuation files

comment:114 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move references to references file, move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation to move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods
New commits:
709e7f6  GaussValuation is available on the global scope

a86ed5e  added introductory examples for developing valuations

f305a7f  Update inductive_valuation.py

b86ddd7  Merge branch 'sage' of github.com:saraedum/mac_lane into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

7bc7f17  Improved intro sections of valuation files

comment:115 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7bc7f170e970245c65c39e379a84d099234e8c83 to 62134d89bd5b2b3f6064e6d9cf48133558bbe91f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
62134d8  move README to the reference manual

comment:116 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from move README to sage documentation, make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods to make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods
New commits:
62134d8  move README to the reference manual

comment:117 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 62134d89bd5b2b3f6064e6d9cf48133558bbe91f to 39ee4e92895e44d022ecc9aebdf7a4aed2eabbfd
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
39ee4e9  Move padic valuation factory documentation

comment:118 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from make sure that valuation() has a lot of the documentation and the factory just references it, remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods to remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods
comment:119 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from remove optional: integrated bits, check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods to check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods
comment:120 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from check that discrete_value_group is still available the same way it was under padics, 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods to 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods
comment:121 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from 33 failing doctests, is anything inheriting from Map/DefaultConvertMap instead of Morphism?, check generated documentation, add references to methods to 33 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method
comment:122 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 39ee4e92895e44d022ecc9aebdf7a4aed2eabbfd to d893c55a222ef01c0c281c7fc9032118003e8dcc
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
d893c55  remove completed TODO

comment:123 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 33 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method to 33 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method, comments on github
New commits:
d893c55  remove completed TODO

comment:124 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:125 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:126 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from d893c55a222ef01c0c281c7fc9032118003e8dcc to e318075c0420a9225010a4b57c66e68d9c052567
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e318075  value_group has moved

comment:127 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from e318075c0420a9225010a4b57c66e68d9c052567 to a2d10913245fc598684fe178f3eaf74bac5e5b2e
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a2d1091  fix toctree formatting

comment:128 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from a2d10913245fc598684fe178f3eaf74bac5e5b2e to 9b0280042e3e1266bce9c4dee0e92ec207d0205f
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
9b02800  fix docbuild

comment:129 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 9b0280042e3e1266bce9c4dee0e92ec207d0205f to 735cd8d901ea93cf7e7d2613e16f9f0514967ec4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
735cd8d  fix typo

comment:130 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 735cd8d901ea93cf7e7d2613e16f9f0514967ec4 to 04dd3954fc4969dab2049e689453ddb606a5419e
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
04dd395  fix reference link

comment:131 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 04dd3954fc4969dab2049e689453ddb606a5419e to 36f33e6cbd3d8535f8c1da12af0e9f549df8f602
comment:132 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 36f33e6cbd3d8535f8c1da12af0e9f549df8f602 to 4630b93916bf0c5277c63eef537019e6ce3c28fe
comment:133 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 4630b93916bf0c5277c63eef537019e6ce3c28fe to cc9607fbf5d5e836a20f97117991886d3d27aab1
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
cc9607f  fix docbuild

comment:134 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from cc9607fbf5d5e836a20f97117991886d3d27aab1 to 2b767b709f4cf5e11e4d1bdf946e726a0e5865df
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
2b767b7  fix reference key

comment:135 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2b767b709f4cf5e11e4d1bdf946e726a0e5865df to cdf89aef1bf3a1b6f7c98a650ce8669dd6c1becb
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
cdf89ae  renamed reference manual section

comment:136 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:137 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from cdf89aef1bf3a1b6f7c98a650ce8669dd6c1becb to c011093d3b22d3826a51c28f48bf81cef79063fd
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
c011093  reformat headers for reference manual

comment:138 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 33 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method, comments on github to 121 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method, comments on github
New commits:
c011093  reformat headers for reference manual

comment:139 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from c011093d3b22d3826a51c28f48bf81cef79063fd to 8022ed196995b2e7b1bc93c9dcd5f0d93fd3bfd4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
8022ed1  fix docbuild

comment:140 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 8022ed196995b2e7b1bc93c9dcd5f0d93fd3bfd4 to 14e034e46f0834f42f0ddd84f74a8b2814dbe809
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
14e034e  fix value_group documentation

comment:141 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 14e034e46f0834f42f0ddd84f74a8b2814dbe809 to 3bff1b961ca0104b5cb70415b2100bd4c83d1ae8
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
3bff1b9  fix documentation in valuation

comment:142 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 3bff1b961ca0104b5cb70415b2100bd4c83d1ae8 to 7db0f057258c627ac6e648cebd67536569500cd6
comment:143 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7db0f057258c627ac6e648cebd67536569500cd6 to 2f6dd581cc8768f4cfa467629df2fe50773758b2
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
2f6dd58  fix MacLane references

comment:144 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2f6dd581cc8768f4cfa467629df2fe50773758b2 to 007499ebc0532f8c9fb63767d359b9dcbf582cac
comment:145 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 007499ebc0532f8c9fb63767d359b9dcbf582cac to a105a8f43dc3bce318bb373d9fccf0a0ec34948b
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a105a8f  fixed links in documentation

comment:146 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from a105a8f43dc3bce318bb373d9fccf0a0ec34948b to 3b91735e9718a4b000a627a451ddc6aedef61ac2
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
3b91735  fixing links in developing valuation

comment:147 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 3b91735e9718a4b000a627a451ddc6aedef61ac2 to ee5abb213abfaa78d2ebe82f839c5fe312b54146
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
ee5abb2  Fix links in developing valuation

comment:148 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from ee5abb213abfaa78d2ebe82f839c5fe312b54146 to 548e879415fb1a128531f4961f51cc9e88a3e313
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
51e89db  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

0f66745  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

984cc75  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

35b62e6  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

c50f6ec  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

93757ef  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

5c62063  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

f173caf  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

013292f  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

548e879  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:149 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 121 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method, comments on github to 121 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:150 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 121 failing doctests, check generated documentation, add references to method, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 121 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:151 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 121 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 120 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:152 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 548e879415fb1a128531f4961f51cc9e88a3e313 to 2ca7a7c934463219690fd31d5ff4f4c3ee341c31
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
6da7536  fix broken documentation links

6aa9f65  Fixed documentation

d27262a  Fix _richcmp_

6509f94  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/saraedum/23190' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

fb66f9f  Fix richcmp

e3fb631  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_polynomial_ring_embeds_into_its_fraction_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23185/a_polynomial_ring_embeds_into_its_fraction_field

f3ecd0e  added missing doctest

5093894  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/saraedum/a_polynomial_ring_embeds_into_its_fraction_field' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

2ca7a7c  fix pickling of valuations

comment:153 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 120 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 67 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
New commits:
6da7536  fix broken documentation links

6aa9f65  Fixed documentation

d27262a  Fix _richcmp_

6509f94  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/saraedum/23190' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

fb66f9f  Fix richcmp

e3fb631  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_polynomial_ring_embeds_into_its_fraction_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23185/a_polynomial_ring_embeds_into_its_fraction_field

f3ecd0e  added missing doctest

5093894  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/saraedum/a_polynomial_ring_embeds_into_its_fraction_field' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

2ca7a7c  fix pickling of valuations

comment:154 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2ca7a7c934463219690fd31d5ff4f4c3ee341c31 to 45e0e8f7cb9b0b6b8aaa1d3af8e4c4a761fb0cca
comment:155 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 67 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 53 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:156 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 45e0e8f7cb9b0b6b8aaa1d3af8e4c4a761fb0cca to 6de28680e68ec96f826efca092dc39b8e032158c
comment:157 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 53 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 46 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:158 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 6de28680e68ec96f826efca092dc39b8e032158c to 249bdc0743c0c79ffd6cec510db0d9c7bbec49e2
comment:159 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 46 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 36 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:160 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510
comment:161 Changed 21 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525
comment:162 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 249bdc0743c0c79ffd6cec510db0d9c7bbec49e2 to 005e7ab0f7740c533e13de1c5f9555cf1575fb72
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
a92f47f  make sure that arguments to add_bigoh are correctly normalized

aa1709d  comment on stagnating degrees

005e7ab  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:163 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 005e7ab0f7740c533e13de1c5f9555cf1575fb72 to 2d1cb90b3deffd9210a9d6366cdf8666c38acbdc
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
bd15d71  add exact keyword

99dccf6  Merge branch 't/23331/allow_exact_defining_polynomials_for_p_adic_extensions' into t/20310/change_precision

ef4ed33  Fix SEEALSO:

1754b44  Fix exact=True errors in the right branch

7926b41  Moving code for fraction_field and integer_ring, and enabling fraction fields for fixedmod

7712a86  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/roed/fixed_mod_frac_field' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

276e4f7  fix and fill in doctest output

9b03cf8  compute fraction field only when necessary

a886c42  fix pickling of nodes

2d1cb90  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:164 Changed 21 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 36 failing doctests, comments on github, check docbuild output for broken links to 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
Last 10 new commits:
1754b44  Fix exact=True errors in the right branch

7926b41  Moving code for fraction_field and integer_ring, and enabling fraction fields for fixedmod

7712a86  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/u/roed/fixed_mod_frac_field' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

276e4f7  fix and fill in doctest output

9b03cf8  compute fraction field only when necessary

a886c42  fix pickling of nodes

a92f47f  make sure that arguments to add_bigoh are correctly normalized

aa1709d  comment on stagnating degrees

005e7ab  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

2d1cb90  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:165 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 2d1cb90b3deffd9210a9d6366cdf8666c38acbdc to 282c95ea845009b91e5db57e9b6f76de562f64ab
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
282c95e  Remove "not slopes"

comment:166 Changed 21 months ago by
 Work issues changed from 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links, check _richcmp_ implementations
comment:168 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from 282c95ea845009b91e5db57e9b6f76de562f64ab to ad9adb1ab69e0bec23ce6a87a4f6f106e85b78f1
comment:169 Changed 21 months ago by
 Commit changed from ad9adb1ab69e0bec23ce6a87a4f6f106e85b78f1 to 7660eab0134f488f18572d2b4a2a856d43641f33
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
28fbf35  Check that extensions are computed correctly in towers of number fields

101502e  Merge branch 'develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

1221125  remove TABs

7660eab  Mapped valuations should know whether they are discrete

comment:170 Changed 20 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620
comment:171 Changed 20 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7660eab0134f488f18572d2b4a2a856d43641f33 to 51f7ed09ea118b0d05c6bc124c159b321c89a90c
comment:172 Changed 20 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620, #23642
comment:173 Changed 20 months ago by
 Commit changed from 51f7ed09ea118b0d05c6bc124c159b321c89a90c to 7c915f1213eb08f9b5bb487b2d21b1755ff2fff4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7c915f1  Merge branch 'develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:174 Changed 20 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
comment:175 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7c915f1213eb08f9b5bb487b2d21b1755ff2fff4 to 29feccb3d72a85cd739d09faa621d4690798ad7d
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
82338dc  Fix factorization over fraction fields that are isomorphic to function fields

64e6546  Merge branch 'develop' into t/23642/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect

f6dd0cd  Better isomorphisms between fraction fields and function fields

38f18b8  minor docstring change

8bfe326  Merge branch 'develop' into t/23660/better_isomorphisms_between_function_fields_and_fraction_fields

746eac0  fix docstring

4bddab1  Merge branch 't/23660/better_isomorphisms_between_function_fields_and_fraction_fields' into t/23642/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect

29feccb  Merge branch 't/23642/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:176 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 29feccb3d72a85cd739d09faa621d4690798ad7d to b3c8ac3730edd5b5977fbaa93c1cca1096df6dda
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
7e62f70  Fixing errors in the coercion to the fraction field for fixedmod padics

1a4333a  Merge branch 't/13591/add_bigoh' into t/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field

cdeb376  Merge branch 't/13591/add_bigoh' into t/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field

cb882fd  Update add_bigoh to account for fixedmod having a fraction field

a826978  Fix _tester_add_bigoh

883e6b5  Fix doctest in local_generic_element.pyx

52cbd2a  Merge branch 'u/roed/fixed_mod_frac_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field

bc59ffa  Merge branch 't/14825/polynomial_representation_of_a_padic_number' into t/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field

3292259  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/fixed_mod_frac_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field

b3c8ac3  Merge branch 't/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:177 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from b3c8ac3730edd5b5977fbaa93c1cca1096df6dda to 608c5c3dda3ae4560bc0e88eeb440233ab5aa4bc
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
608c5c3  Use names for richcmp operators

comment:178 Changed 19 months ago by
 Work issues changed from 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links, check _richcmp_ implementations to 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
David: I made a trivial change. I don't think it needs review.
comment:179 Changed 19 months ago by
Yeah, that change seems fine.
comment:180 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 25 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:181 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 608c5c3dda3ae4560bc0e88eeb440233ab5aa4bc to a63c1ffa21e57a3db4866793fee42740e01f0fbf
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
b81b722  Remove use of depraceted list()

2904b76  Merge branch 't/14825/polynomial_representation_of_a_padic_number' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

5739955  Base change factorization to the right parent

c17adf7  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23642/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect

a63c1ff  Merge branch 't/23642/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:182 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from a63c1ffa21e57a3db4866793fee42740e01f0fbf to 226518c0b8e1b01e9f047cb42d5420556d01f7e6
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
28b36f8  Fix ScaleAction

b6c62d0  Fix doctests

99b3ab2  Merge branch 't/23642/factorization_over_some_quotient_rings_incorrect' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

dad02c7  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/fixed_mod_frac_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field

189ac2b  Add _test_fraction_field to the coercion tutorial

9ecff79  Merge branch 't/23510/fixed_mod_frac_field' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

226518c  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:183 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 25 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 17 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:184 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 226518c0b8e1b01e9f047cb42d5420556d01f7e6 to 271f6ec79d1dd5e700816a0a43dd3ed3751ecf92
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
271f6ec  Use a more specialized class for nonclassical discrete valuations on function fields

comment:185 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 17 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 16 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
New commits:
271f6ec  Use a more specialized class for nonclassical discrete valuations on function fields

comment:186 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 16 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 10 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:187 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 271f6ec79d1dd5e700816a0a43dd3ed3751ecf92 to 20868e9de4fbaa180a0581f1552c02e199ee4b49
comment:188 Changed 19 months ago by
 Work issues changed from 10 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 9 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:189 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:190 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 20868e9de4fbaa180a0581f1552c02e199ee4b49 to 27351d9440667c18e64c5baa7e26c26e24e07918
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
27351d9  Bring back equivalence_decompositions into local rings

comment:191 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 9 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 8 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
New commits:
27351d9  Bring back equivalence_decompositions into local rings

comment:192 Changed 19 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620, #23642 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620, #23642, #23965
comment:193 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 27351d9440667c18e64c5baa7e26c26e24e07918 to 76df6901142e9484c6969d3b4d5afeed81482982
comment:194 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 8 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
New commits:
55b33e4  Coercions to the fraction field are injective

ac081b0  Merge branch 't/23965/coercion_to_fraction_field_is_injective' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

76df690  Fill in doctest output

New commits:
55b33e4  Coercions to the fraction field are injective

ac081b0  Merge branch 't/23965/coercion_to_fraction_field_is_injective' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

76df690  Fill in doctest output

comment:195 Changed 19 months ago by
 Dependencies changed from #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620, #23642, #23965 to #21782, #23166, #23167, #21879, #23185, #23203, #23204, #23211, #23188, #21879, #23186, #23191, #21996, #23190, #23495, #23483, #23510, #23525, #23620, #23642, #23965, #23966
comment:196 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 7 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 6 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:197 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 76df6901142e9484c6969d3b4d5afeed81482982 to c7ac63228cc88d0e03b4cc87ed89bb5db8a16344
comment:198 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from c7ac63228cc88d0e03b4cc87ed89bb5db8a16344 to d9b94870dad0e5079a6eef07533af6514cdc0ca4
comment:199 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from d9b94870dad0e5079a6eef07533af6514cdc0ca4 to 6c5c12b4e18253522eb6ea52f106f7601de27b0e
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
6c5c12b  fill in doctest output

comment:200 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 6c5c12b4e18253522eb6ea52f106f7601de27b0e to 41277b3f9070fe51be20cdc05f15f4c852e12205
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
41277b3  Fix factorization doctests

comment:201 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 6 failing doctests, check docbuild output for broken links to 1 failing doctest, check docbuild output for broken links
comment:202 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 41277b3f9070fe51be20cdc05f15f4c852e12205 to 09b64022a765aa6116f10aaf846f410a074d4821
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
09b6402  stable factorization output

comment:203 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 09b64022a765aa6116f10aaf846f410a074d4821 to dfad6f47d2e8edf2e7cb694f29cc0c4316a4dc1c
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
dfad6f4  Fix valuation.lift(report_coefficients=True)

comment:204 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
 Work issues changed from 1 failing doctest, check docbuild output for broken links to check docbuild output for broken links
comment:205 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from dfad6f47d2e8edf2e7cb694f29cc0c4316a4dc1c to 8767fdc5d81f83172e6daac6fd1aa143fa7cb41c
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
8767fdc  fix docbuild

comment:206 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 8767fdc5d81f83172e6daac6fd1aa143fa7cb41c to ecfe1bc9d6b021d0066269a9c21d7022e9e28e97
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
ecfe1bc  fix doc references

comment:207 Changed 19 months ago by
 Work issues check docbuild output for broken links deleted
comment:208 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from ecfe1bc9d6b021d0066269a9c21d7022e9e28e97 to 775e093eb3076c1ebf44bd2867340605700c2a35
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
775e093  Remove Python2 code from valuations

comment:209 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
 Work issues set to 55 failing long doctests
New commits:
775e093  Remove Python2 code from valuations

comment:210 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:211 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 775e093eb3076c1ebf44bd2867340605700c2a35 to 5a555ada7232c5a9ea28f073b8f6d0f26024de83
comment:212 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 5a555ada7232c5a9ea28f073b8f6d0f26024de83 to 46b8c2ea13cf0e0d1288076b2d6345c71d812ab4
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
46b8c2e  Fix _test_inverse handling of NotImplementedError

comment:213 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Work issues changed from 55 failing long doctests to 8 failing long doctests
comment:214 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 46b8c2ea13cf0e0d1288076b2d6345c71d812ab4 to 716d66bd30adab7b25fb85a5dfa3e78014b243b2
comment:215 Changed 19 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
 Work issues 8 failing long doctests deleted
comment:216 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 716d66bd30adab7b25fb85a5dfa3e78014b243b2 to 5578cae3051b2637aa31b06a28958b8a5d739a14
comment:217 Changed 19 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:218 followup: ↓ 227 Changed 19 months ago by
In _test_shift
in valuation_space.py
, you're not actually doing tests, just having lines with boolean statements.
comment:219 followup: ↓ 228 Changed 19 months ago by
In index.rst
there are some \QQ
s that should probably be \Q
s. Have you tried building the documentation recently? I'm surprised this didn't cause problems....
Is there a place I can look at the generated documentation online? It might be easier to catch some kinds of problems there.
comment:220 followup: ↓ 229 Changed 19 months ago by
In function_field.py
there's a typo in We create a valuation that correspond
(should be plural).
comment:221 followup: ↓ 231 Changed 19 months ago by
In padic_valuation.py
you have self.domain()(~ZpFM(self.p(), ZZ(precision).ceil())(x))
. This is probably better done with the inverse_mod
method in integers, since then you don't have to construct a new parent. Also, if precision isn't integral, won't ZZ(precision)
fail before you can call ceil()
on it?
comment:222 followup: ↓ 232 Changed 19 months ago by
There are a few really long lines. I don't really mind them, but they might be worth thinking about breaking up. For example,
return self.domain().change_ring(self.domain())([0 if valuations[i] > error else self._base_valuation.simplify(c, error=errori*self._mu, force=force, phiadic=True) for (i,c) in enumerate(coefficients)])(self.phi())
comment:223 followup: ↓ 233 Changed 19 months ago by
In the montes_factorization
tests, why do you specify required precision be 0? Runtime? Feasibility of printing the result?
comment:224 followup: ↓ 234 Changed 19 months ago by
You should probably not delete 'reference/tensor_free_modules'
from sage_setup/docbuild/__init__.py
.
comment:225 followup: ↓ 235 Changed 19 months ago by
In index.rst
, where you do say random output (order may vary)
, why not just use sorted
?
comment:226 Changed 19 months ago by
Tests pass though! I think we're almost there.
comment:227 in reply to: ↑ 218 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
In
_test_shift
invaluation_space.py
, you're not actually doing tests, just having lines with boolean statements.
Yes, fixed.
comment:228 in reply to: ↑ 219 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
In
index.rst
there are some\Q
s. Have you tried building the documentation recently? I'm surprised this didn't cause problems....
It did not seem to cause problems. But I changed it anyway.
Is there a place I can look at the generated documentation online? It might be easier to catch some kinds of problems there.
https://drugtestbots.info.tm/reference/valuations/index.html (still uploading)
comment:229 in reply to: ↑ 220 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
In
function_field.py
there's a typo inWe create a valuation that correspond
(should be plural).
Ok. Fixed
comment:230 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 5578cae3051b2637aa31b06a28958b8a5d739a14 to 159491957d15df472d93f9b4505d237fbb2d43c7
comment:231 in reply to: ↑ 221 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
In
padic_valuation.py
you haveself.domain()(~ZpFM(self.p(), ZZ(precision).ceil())(x))
. This is probably better done with theinverse_mod
method in integers, since then you don't have to construct a new parent. Also, if precision isn't integral, won'tZZ(precision)
fail before you can callceil()
on it?
Thanks, all fixed.
New commits:
175d9e1  fix LaTeX errors in reference manual

0e9fa0c  fix grammar in docstring

3afa634  Fix handling of rationals in inverse()

b457126  comment on required_precision=0

6b1f708  assert something in _test_shift

1594919  Fix _test_shift()

New commits:
175d9e1  fix LaTeX errors in reference manual

0e9fa0c  fix grammar in docstring

3afa634  Fix handling of rationals in inverse()

b457126  comment on required_precision=0

6b1f708  assert something in _test_shift

1594919  Fix _test_shift()

comment:232 in reply to: ↑ 222 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
There are a few really long lines. I don't really mind them, but they might be worth thinking about breaking up. For example,
return self.domain().change_ring(self.domain())([0 if valuations[i] > error else self._base_valuation.simplify(c, error=errori*self._mu, force=force, phiadic=True) for (i,c) in enumerate(coefficients)])(self.phi())
I tried to fix some of these.
comment:233 in reply to: ↑ 223 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
In the
montes_factorization
tests, why do you specify required precision be 0? Runtime? Feasibility of printing the result?
Because of speed. It finds an exact factorization without which takes forever (I did not wait for it to terminate) as it is very slowly improving the quality of the approximation. I added a comment.
comment:234 in reply to: ↑ 224 ; followup: ↓ 238 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
You should probably not delete
'reference/tensor_free_modules'
fromsage_setup/docbuild/__init__.py
.
Why not? It used to be the last item in this list, now valuations has taken its spot.
comment:235 in reply to: ↑ 225 Changed 19 months ago by
Replying to roed:
In
index.rst
, where you do sayrandom output (order may vary)
, why not just usesorted
?
Because I want this to be a readable introduction. I think that sorting would make it much more cryptic to people who are not so fluent in python.
comment:236 Changed 19 months ago by
I think I addressed all your comments.
comment:237 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 159491957d15df472d93f9b4505d237fbb2d43c7 to 20d3ad9f62502bb77b54d3b468128ba1f2ff8269
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
20d3ad9  broke some long lines

comment:238 in reply to: ↑ 234 Changed 19 months ago by
comment:239 Changed 19 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:240 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 20d3ad9f62502bb77b54d3b468128ba1f2ff8269 to 3c0dd8ff18284135983926f7c73db688a6dd4c1d
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
I just merged in the last few dependencies and changed some whitespace in valuation_space.py
. Looks good to me!
New commits:
3447e80  Changing whitespace

a323641  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/discval

df62c48  Merge branch 'u/roed/fixed_mod_frac_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/23965/fracfield_coercion_injective

a4d9ad6  Catch exceptions raised by attempting to find fraction field

bd7d54e  Merge branch 't/23965/fracfield_coercion_injective' into t/21869/discval

98d8256  Merge branch 'u/roed/fixed_mod_frac_field' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into develop

b8de189  Different fix for 23966, add doctest

3c0dd8f  Merge branch 't/23966/ZpFM_to_fracfield' into t/21869/discval

comment:241 Changed 19 months ago by
Do not implement both _cmp_
and _richcmp_
. The second one only please.
comment:242 Changed 19 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:243 Changed 19 months ago by
 Commit changed from 3c0dd8ff18284135983926f7c73db688a6dd4c1d to bb86ca0fd179a17464c240ff703827355b1b2d27
comment:244 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
PDF docs don't build
comment:245 Changed 18 months ago by
 Work issues set to PDF documentation does not build
I can not build PDF docs locally (not sure why but it's not related to this ticket.) Can someone else try to fix this?
comment:246 Changed 18 months ago by
I'm giving it a shot.
comment:247 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:248 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from bb86ca0fd179a17464c240ff703827355b1b2d27 to 8ed55a6baf4f9bf1f5d250b27ccffd216c46d634
I fixed some problems, but I'm not sure that I got them all since make docclean && sage docbuild reference pdf
doesn't seem to see my changes (and still complains about the unicode <= symbol). I'm not sure why....
New commits:
3447e80  Changing whitespace

a323641  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/discval

bd7d54e  Merge branch 't/23965/fracfield_coercion_injective' into t/21869/discval

3c0dd8f  Merge branch 't/23966/ZpFM_to_fracfield' into t/21869/discval

8ed55a6  Fixing some pdf docbuild issues.

comment:249 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from 8ed55a6baf4f9bf1f5d250b27ccffd216c46d634 to e8cfff08cdad8d07b38da97e995dd32dc4f4c284
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
bb2f7c2  Merge commit '7c915f1213' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

4b468bc  Fix errors that caused trouble for docbuild

e8cfff0  Merge branch 'u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:250 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
Okay, documentation builds. Julian, can you take a look at my changes?
comment:251 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
 Work issues PDF documentation does not build deleted
comment:252 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Merge conflict
comment:253 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:254 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from e8cfff08cdad8d07b38da97e995dd32dc4f4c284 to 6f0f9e26ae8dddd256b536c41b71c6e8ad45a2cf
 Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
comment:255 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
[docpdf] ! Undefined control sequence. [docpdf] l.309 induced Gauss valuation on \(\Q [docpdf] [x]\), i.e., the valuation that assigns...
comment:256 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:257 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from 6f0f9e26ae8dddd256b536c41b71c6e8ad45a2cf to 25e48096e0237f2d00ed288689b4c2d0652d587e
Oops, I thought I had fixed that but it looks like it didn't get pushed.
New commits:
bb2f7c2  Merge commit '7c915f1213' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

4b468bc  Fix errors that caused trouble for docbuild

3447e80  Changing whitespace

a323641  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/discval

bd7d54e  Merge branch 't/23965/fracfield_coercion_injective' into t/21869/discval

3c0dd8f  Merge branch 't/23966/ZpFM_to_fracfield' into t/21869/discval

8ed55a6  Fixing some pdf docbuild issues.

e8cfff0  Merge branch 'u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

25e4809  Merge branch 'u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage' of git://trac.sagemath.org/sage into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:258 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:259 Changed 18 months ago by
Julian, let me know if you're happy with these fixes. I'm currently building and running sage docbuild reference pdf
.
comment:260 Changed 18 months ago by
Looks good. Positive review if it now actually builds :)
comment:261 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Yep, pdf documentation builds.
comment:262 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
On some 32bit buildbots I get
********************************************************************** File "src/doc/en/reference/valuations/index.rst", line 36, in doc.en.reference.valuations.index Failed example: w(a + 3), ww(a + 3) Expected: (1, 0) Got: (0, 1) ********************************************************************** File "src/doc/en/reference/valuations/index.rst", line 38, in doc.en.reference.valuations.index Failed example: w(a + 5), ww(a + 5) Expected: (0, 1) Got: (1, 0) ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 2 of 54 in doc.en.reference.valuations.index [53 tests, 2 failures, 0.92 s]
comment:263 Changed 18 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/roed/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage
comment:264 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from 25e48096e0237f2d00ed288689b4c2d0652d587e to b4756f5a04be2b56735972078238283b1372c322
comment:265 Changed 18 months ago by
Two comments on
try: ret = sorted(leafs, key=lambda v: str(v)) except: # if for some reason the valuation can not be printed, we leave them unsorted ret = list(leafs)
You can just use key=str
, and you shouldn't have a bare except
(except Exception
is probably fine).
comment:266 Changed 18 months ago by
 Work issues set to fix bare except
Yes, you are right. I should actually know about both ;) This is not ready for review. I can't get sage to build from develop locally at all at the moment, so I wanted to see how bad such a change is (by having it be tested by the patchbots).
New commits:
b4756f5  Make mac_lane_approximants output more stable

comment:267 Changed 18 months ago by
If you want, there's a copy in Src/sageroed
in the sd88
project on k8s
; I've added you to the project so that you can access it. I'm running doctests there now.
comment:268 Changed 18 months ago by
 Work issues fix bare except deleted
comment:269 Changed 18 months ago by
 Commit changed from b4756f5a04be2b56735972078238283b1372c322 to c4a9900c04eeffeb083ec59e6556a354981acaa1
comment:270 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:271 Changed 18 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
 Work issues set to doctest output order
There's a doctest failure because of output ordering. I'll try to fix it, but may not have time to do it today....
comment:272 Changed 17 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
 Work issues doctest output order deleted
comment:273 Changed 17 months ago by
 Commit changed from c4a9900c04eeffeb083ec59e6556a354981acaa1 to 4583f6557566fea5c01f62fab6e8d05a993da832
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
4583f65  fix output order

comment:274 Changed 17 months ago by
There seems to be a nondeterministic failure (it occurred on one of the three patchbot runs for this commit):
sage t long src/sage/rings/valuation/mapped_valuation.py ********************************************************************** File "src/sage/rings/valuation/mapped_valuation.py", line 507, in sage.rings.valuation.mapped_valuation.FiniteExtensionFromInfiniteValuation.upper_bound Failed example: u.upper_bound(t + 2) Expected: 3 Got: 2 ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 1 of 8 in sage.rings.valuation.mapped_valuation.FiniteExtensionFromInfiniteValuation.upper_bound
Any ideas?
comment:275 Changed 17 months ago by
The upper bound is not nondeterministic itself. I don't remember really but I don't think that there is anything nondeterministic in my code.
comment:276 Changed 17 months ago by
The upper_bound depends on the precision of the underlying approximation, so the upper_bound can change between calls. As long as the doctests run in a deterministic order, I don't see why this should happen.
comment:277 followup: ↓ 280 Changed 16 months ago by
We now have 13 good patchbot runs and one that failed. Would it be acceptable to ignore this?
comment:278 Changed 16 months ago by
I started some patchbots on my own and kick
ed the old results to get some more data here.
comment:279 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from 4583f6557566fea5c01f62fab6e8d05a993da832 to 7b19f8a8bd683ecdaf7055577753c8e3e31d2b3d
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
7b19f8a  Merge remotetracking branch 'origin/develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:280 in reply to: ↑ 277 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Replying to saraedum:
We now have 13 good patchbot runs and one that failed. Would it be acceptable to ignore this?
I think that's reasonable. I'm happy with this ticket, and there are lots of patchbot runs where all tests pass. Positive review from me.
comment:281 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
I'm getting a bunch of failures of the form
File "src/sage/rings/valuation/valuation_space.py", line 506, in sage.rings.valuation.valuation_space.DiscretePseudoValuationSpace.ElementMethods.residue_ring Failed example: GaussValuation(ZZ['x'], ZZ.valuation(2)).residue_ring() Expected: Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Finite Field of size 2 (using NTL) Got: Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Finite Field of size 2 (using GF2X) ********************************************************************** 1 item had failures: 1 of 6 in sage.rings.valuation.valuation_space.DiscretePseudoValuationSpace.ElementMethods.residue_ring [201 tests, 1 failure, 0.56 s]
comment:282 Changed 16 months ago by
Ok. I'll try to reproduce this locally…but I have to rebuild Sage of course…
comment:283 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
I don't see this problem with the latest develop merged in. Could you tell us more about the machines and base revision where this is failing?
comment:284 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Try with the next beta
comment:285 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from 7b19f8a8bd683ecdaf7055577753c8e3e31d2b3d to c53f45c7fe243ba5ef2e53dd54b428d3d8218ee7
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
613a524  Merge remotetracking branch 'origin/develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

e05c325  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

c53f45c  Fix doctests

comment:286 Changed 16 months ago by
I fixed the trivial doctest errors.
There are also a bunch of doctest errors in the patchbots that do not seem to be related to what we are doing here. I am rebuilding sage locally and report back once I have checked locally.
comment:287 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to positive_review
comment:288 Changed 16 months ago by
 Commit changed from c53f45c7fe243ba5ef2e53dd54b428d3d8218ee7 to 6892bdda7b4df40403dea51a1ff31f47dba0fc0d
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_review
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
6892bdd  Workaround a noisy doctest

comment:289 Changed 16 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Looks good to me.
comment:290 Changed 15 months ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
[docpdf] ! Missing $ inserted. [docpdf] <inserted text> [docpdf] $ [docpdf] l.1203 relation \sphinxcode{P.v ≤ V.v} [docpdf] (pointwise on the polynomial ring K...
comment:291 Changed 15 months ago by
 Commit changed from 6892bdda7b4df40403dea51a1ff31f47dba0fc0d to e78174232093e0931514f6fc6038be22a2bc4e0c
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e781742  Fix documentation build issues

comment:292 Changed 15 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:293 Changed 15 months ago by
 Commit changed from e78174232093e0931514f6fc6038be22a2bc4e0c to e01a3ab0fbd7f40532395063e2cc7e9defd579a0
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
e01a3ab  Require incomparability

comment:294 Changed 15 months ago by
The changes could make some outputs gain precision. Let's see what the patchbots think…
comment:295 Changed 15 months ago by
There's an extra space in the new commit: 10*x^1 2
.
comment:296 Changed 15 months ago by
 Commit changed from e01a3ab0fbd7f40532395063e2cc7e9defd579a0 to 21428911816e42073feb06eaa3867b55bfd2e31a
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
2142891  fix copy & paste mistake

comment:297 Changed 15 months ago by
I'm trying to build the documentation now to check the previous change.
New commits:
2142891  fix copy & paste mistake

comment:298 Changed 15 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
File "src/sage/rings/padics/padic_valuation.py", line 726, in sage.rings.padics.padic_valuation.pAdicValuation_base.extensions Failed example: QQ.valuation(2).extensions(L) Expected: Traceback (most recent call last): ... ValueError: The valuation [ Gauss valuation induced by 2adic valuation, v(x) = 1/2 ] does not approximate a unique extension of 2adic valuation with respect to x^4 + 2*x^3 + 2*x^2 + 8 Got: [[ 2adic valuation, v(x + 2) = 3/2 ]adic valuation, [ 2adic valuation, v(x) = 1/2 ]adic valuation]
comment:299 Changed 15 months ago by
 Commit changed from 21428911816e42073feb06eaa3867b55bfd2e31a to 4900f56945720dba8eeaff3be5d5d4c18e443b0f
comment:300 Changed 15 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:301 Changed 15 months ago by
 Commit changed from 4900f56945720dba8eeaff3be5d5d4c18e443b0f to 24807e364bb0ac04e998465ad7c25ee28d16fbf8
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
24807e3  Merge remotetracking branch 'trac/develop' into t/21869/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage

comment:302 Changed 15 months ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:303 Changed 15 months ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
The failing builds look to be due to some unrelated giac issue, and I don't know what the failed apply is. I'm happy with the changes and the documentation builds when I test it. Let's set this back to positive review.
comment:304 Changed 15 months ago by
 Branch changed from u/saraedum/a_framework_for_discrete_valuations_in_sage to 24807e364bb0ac04e998465ad7c25ee28d16fbf8
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:305 Changed 14 months ago by
 Commit 24807e364bb0ac04e998465ad7c25ee28d16fbf8 deleted
 Description modified (diff)
comment:306 Changed 4 months ago by
What's the point of these doctests?
Note that this does not affect comparison of valuations which do not coerce into a common parent. This is by design in Sage, see :meth:`sage.structure.element.Element.__richcmp__`. When the valuations do not coerce into a common parent, a rather random comparison of ``id`` happens:: sage: w = valuations.TrivialValuation(GF(2)) sage: w <= v # random output True sage: v <= w # random output False
I plan to remove them in #26934
comment:307 followup: ↓ 308 Changed 4 months ago by
I thought that the docstring is quite technical, so the doctest illustrates what I mean. They don't "test" anything, they are really part of the documentation.
comment:308 in reply to: ↑ 307 Changed 4 months ago by
comment:309 Changed 4 months ago by
It's a detail of the coercion model but here the point is just that it does not work the way you would expect it to. Comparisons are important in this context and it's therefore important to document the limitations. If it raises an error, all the better.
Last 10 new commits:
fix typo in comment
Added a tutorial in the README
move to subdirectory for merging with sage tree
removing gitignore for merge with sage tree
Merge mac_lane infrastructure for discrete valuations into sage
remove mac_lane LICENSE
remove obsolete TODOs
remove monkey patches
move valuation code to valuation/
remove specific valuation code out of valuation/