Opened 6 years ago
Closed 12 months ago
#21570 closed enhancement (invalid)
Move non-scripts of src/bin/ elsewhere (and also move their install location)
Reported by: | mkoeppe | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
Component: | build | Keywords: | |
Cc: | embray, leif, jdemeyer, dimpase, fbissey | Merged in: | |
Authors: | Reviewers: | Matthias Koeppe, Samuel Lelièvre | |
Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
Branch: | Commit: | ||
Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
src/bin
contains some stuff that is not an executable script, such as sage-README-osx.txt
.
It should be moved elsewhere; and also be installed in a place other than $SAGE_LOCAL/bin
.
See also:
- #21569: Install
src/bin/*
scripts viasetup.py
(scripts
,console_scripts
) - #21559: Move sage-the-distribution scripts from src/bin to build/bin
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Info: https://docs.python.org/2/distutils/setupscript.html#installing-package-data
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
- Cc embray leif jdemeyer added
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
- Cc dimpase fbissey added
- Milestone changed from sage-7.4 to sage-9.1
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by
Thanks for the pointer! I've noted this in #21559.
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-9.1 to sage-9.2
pushing these forward to 9.2
comment:7 Changed 23 months ago by
- Milestone changed from sage-9.2 to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Status changed from new to needs_review
I think this has been completed already.
comment:8 Changed 12 months ago by
- Reviewers set to Matthias Koeppe, Samuel Lelièvre
- Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
comment:9 Changed 12 months ago by
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from positive_review to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
As for the OS X readme, note this was already essentially done in #25995 (a year and a half ago) so probably you could just delete it without further problems - see comment:30:ticket:25995.