Opened 4 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#21560 new defect
return Infinity from factorial of negative integer
Reported by:  rws  Owned by:  aashu12 

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage7.4 
Component:  symbolics  Keywords:  
Cc:  Merged in:  
Authors:  Ashutosh Ahelleya  Reviewers:  
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  u/aashu12/return_infinity_from_factorial_of_negative_integer (Commits)  Commit:  02fc09cc36e79ed9301f4b58f0268eb81697ba9e 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
sage: factorial(5) ... ValueError: factorial  self = (5) must be nonnegative
Adapt the function's behaviour to what other CASs (sympy, Wolfram) do at integer n<1: return unsigned infinity.
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by
 Owner changed from (none) to aashu12
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by
Note that already
sage: SR(89).factorial() Infinity
If you decide against Infinity then please change the above for consistency (you can find the code in libs/pynac/pynac.pyx
).
comment:4 followup: ↓ 6 Changed 3 years ago by
As to which one it should be, I guess that's arbitrary. You may need to change code that depends on the exception (maybe there is some in combinatorics
) anyway. Using zero makes possibly sense, maybe to have sane behavour for some combinatorial sums.
comment:5 Changed 3 years ago by
Note also
sage: factorial(89.) NaN
which would be the third alternative.
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 4 Changed 3 years ago by
I feel that it would be better if Unsigned Infinity is returned because in case we return any other value, too many files in different components have to be modified to make sure that the consistency is proper. I will modify the function such that it returns Unsigned Infinity when the input is negative by importing unsigned_infinity
from sage.rings.infinity
comment:7 Changed 3 years ago by
Will it be right here to import unsigned infinity from sage.rings.infinity
?
comment:8 Changed 3 years ago by
That's a style question. I personally import from the specific file instead of from all. I remember a discussion here that recommended that because this way less is imported and less time used. I could not find a reference, sorry. You see both styles used in Sage.
comment:9 Changed 3 years ago by
 Branch set to u/aashu12/return_infinity_from_factorial_of_negative_integer
comment:10 Changed 3 years ago by
 Commit set to 02fc09cc36e79ed9301f4b58f0268eb81697ba9e
New commits:
02fc09c  Return unsigned infinity for a factorial of negative integer

I would like to work on this issue. However, one of the CASs sympy, returns a zero for a negative number given as the input. I would like to clarify if it is required to return unsigned infinity or zero. You can refer this> http://docs.sympy.org/0.7.1/_modules/sympy/functions/combinatorial/factorials.html