#21554 closed task (fixed)
Document noninteger assumption in Maxima
Reported by:  kcrisman  Owned by:  aashu12 

Priority:  trivial  Milestone:  sage7.4 
Component:  documentation  Keywords:  beginner 
Cc:  Merged in:  
Authors:  Ashutosh Ahelleya  Reviewers:  Ralf Stephan 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  u/aashu12/c7acfd690f5283e956bcce87f6a98668da21c798 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  75602b22adb0f7ef8f01f4a9f64007cecdedcc8c 
Dependencies:  Stopgaps: 
Description
It turns out that not only can one declare integer, one can declare noninteger. See here. Let's add an example pointing this out, perhaps with the example from this question.
Change History (22)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
comment:2 followup: ↓ 7 Changed 4 years ago by
First, http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html
and please use the Google group sagedevel for questions unrelated to this specific ticket.
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by
I am interested in adding an example to fix this. How do I know in which part of the sage directory is this located? I guess it is in src/doc/
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by
Nope, you would have to find an appropriate place. The src/doc is mostly autogenerated. Instead, try to add to the documentation for the command mentioned in the question mentioned in the ticket description. The solve
command is in src/sage/symbolic/relation.py or at least that is one place.
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by
Thanks :)
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by
No problem!
comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 4 years ago by
 Owner changed from (none) to aashu12
comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch set to u/aashu12/documentation
comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit set to c7acfd690f5283e956bcce87f6a98668da21c798
 Status changed from new to needs_review
New commits:
c7acfd6  Fixes #21554

comment:10 followup: ↓ 16 Changed 4 years ago by
 Reviewers set to Ralf Stephan
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Looks good. Please insert your real name in the Author field.
comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from positive_review to needs_work
Author name missing
comment:12 Changed 4 years ago by
comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
In such cases you can set positive again yourself.
comment:15 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from u/aashu12/documentation to c7acfd690f5283e956bcce87f6a98668da21c798
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
comment:16 in reply to: ↑ 10 ; followup: ↓ 17 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit c7acfd690f5283e956bcce87f6a98668da21c798 deleted
comment:17 in reply to: ↑ 16 Changed 4 years ago by
Replying to dimpase:
With all respect,
In case one of the solutions while solving an equation is a real number::makes little sense, in particular in the context of this ticket. I'm requesting a clarification on #21946
Yea, I can change that statement to a more clear one. Also, #21946 and this ticket are not dependent.
comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by
 Branch changed from c7acfd690f5283e956bcce87f6a98668da21c798 to u/aashu12/c7acfd690f5283e956bcce87f6a98668da21c798
comment:19 Changed 4 years ago by
 Commit set to 75602b22adb0f7ef8f01f4a9f64007cecdedcc8c
this ticket is closed. Any changes to the branches here will be ignored. (So it should go to another ticket, say #21946) But still, your branch did not and does not make sense. The purpose of this ticket is to document and provide a test for noninteger
assumption. E.g.
sage: var('K') K sage: assume(K, 'noninteger') sage: solve([K^2==1],K) []
The doctring should say what this test doing: it is showing how to use this type of assumption, and not something about reals. (Yes, I agree that the link for an example in the ticket description is somewhat misleading, but, well...)
New commits:
c7acfd6  Fixes #21554

75602b2  Fixed Documentation

comment:20 followup: ↓ 21 Changed 4 years ago by
even better example:
sage: solve([K^3==1],K) [K == 1/2*I*sqrt(3)  1/2, K == 1/2*I*sqrt(3)  1/2]
comment:21 in reply to: ↑ 20 Changed 4 years ago by
comment:22 Changed 4 years ago by
Refer to > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21946
I am interested in working on this. How do I start?