#21538 closed enhancement (wontfix)
./configure --with-packages=...
| Reported by: | mkoeppe | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix |
| Component: | build: configure | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Merged in: | ||
| Authors: | Reviewers: | ||
| Report Upstream: | N/A | Work issues: | |
| Branch: | Commit: | ||
| Dependencies: | Stopgaps: |
Description (last modified by )
./configure should accept an argument --with-packages=... so that a user can request a list of packages to be installed.
One could consider to have sage -i edit config.status (ac_cs_config) whenever a package is installed.
Also there should be an argument --ignored-installed-packages so that the contents of $SAGE_LOCAL/var/lib/sage/installed is ignored by configure. This is may be useful to ensure predictable builds.
See also: #21700 - crucial to get all dependencies of all optional packages right, because we no longer can tell the user to "first install this, then install that".
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by
Yes, this syntax could also work and is probably a better idea.
I like --with-foo=/path/where/installed too, but as I said on #21566, it won't happen on this ticket.
comment:4 Changed 3 years ago by
- Description modified (diff)
comment:5 Changed 12 months ago by
- Milestone sage-7.4 deleted
comment:6 Changed 12 months ago by
#27567 offers a slightly different approach, but I think effectively serves the same purpose as this proposal.
One thing it doesn't do yet is provide a way to enable specific optional/experimental packages at configure time. One might also consider that useful, but I'm treating it as a separate issue for now.
comment:7 Changed 11 months ago by
- Milestone set to sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from new to closed
Superseded for now by #27567, though some of the suggestions in this ticket like --ignore-installed-packages might be useful down the line.
comment:8 Changed 11 months ago by
Not quite - what's missing is the possibility to add optional packages in the configure call.
Why not an argument
--enable-foo(and/or perhaps--with-foo=/path/where/installed, depending on the answer to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21566#comment:3) for each packagefoo?